IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mof/journl/ppr027g.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Study on China fs Social Safety Institution and Income Disparity

Author

Listed:
  • Long KE

    (Senior fellow, Fujitsu Research Institute)

Abstract

Almost twenty years ago, the Chinese government recognized the importance of changing the economic development model and industrial structure, and its achievement of extraordinarily rapid economic development during the past three decades has been described as a miracle generally sustained by officials f fixed-asset investments, the state-owned sector, and exports. China wants to shift the driving force from investment and exports to domestic private consumption, but private consumption is still too weak, despite the government fs numerous announcements to realize the shift. Domestic demand has not played the expected role of driving economic growth instead of fixed-asset investment and exports. Generally the weakness of the social safety net including pensions, health care, unemployment benefits, worker fs compensation, and maternity leave has been the main factor inhibiting private sector consumption because of concerns about the future. Traditionally, state-owned enterprises played the important role of supplying social security service under the socialist central planning era till the open door policy in 1978. Since then the government has liberalized economic control, and it is considered necessary to build a modern social security system like that in developed countries. In addition, consensus has developed that the state-owned sector cannot be expected to supply the social security service while strengthening the competitiveness in the market. The traditional model is not sustainable. From 1998 the government started to reform state-owned enterprises, with the goal of strengthening their efficiency. The government separated and removed the function of the social safety system from the state-owned enterprises to a new platform (Social security fund) that it established. There was a slogan about the state owned reform: gSeizing the large and letting go of the small h (Zhua Da Fang Xiao). Since that time the government has put in much effort to strengthen the social security function, but the capacity of the function is still very weak. One of the problems is that the system is very unfair; it is a system good for officials, but bad for workers and farmers. Basically it is not an integrated comprehensive pool. In particular, farmers are clearly discriminated against in the system. This leads to the conclusion that the weak social safety functions are the factors that led to reduced private consumption. The problem here is how to reform and build a functioning social security system to stabilize society and sustain economic development.

Suggested Citation

  • Long KE, 2015. "A Study on China fs Social Safety Institution and Income Disparity," Public Policy Review, Policy Research Institute, Ministry of Finance Japan, vol. 11(1), pages 205-230, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:mof:journl:ppr027g
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://warp.da.ndl.go.jp/info:ndljp/pid/11217434/www.mof.go.jp/english/pri/publication/pp_review/ppr027/ppr027g.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xiao Wang & Richard Herd, 2013. "The System of Revenue Sharing and Fiscal Transfers in China," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 1030, OECD Publishing.
    2. Wu, Ximing & Perloff, Jeffrey M., 2004. "China's Income Distribution Over Time: Reasons for Rising Inequality," Institute for Research on Labor and Employment, Working Paper Series qt9jw2v939, Institute of Industrial Relations, UC Berkeley.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gu, Xinhua & Tam, Pui Sun, 2013. "The saving–growth–inequality triangle in China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 850-857.
    2. Broich, T. & Szirmai, A., 2014. "China's economic embrace of Africa: An international comparative perspective," MERIT Working Papers 2014-049, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    3. Dong, Xiao-Ying & Hao, Yu, 2018. "Would income inequality affect electricity consumption? Evidence from China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 215-227.
    4. Mitra, Pradeep & Yemtsov, Ruslan, 2006. "Increasing inequality in transition economies : is there more to come?," Policy Research Working Paper Series 4007, The World Bank.
    5. Qin Gao, 2006. "Social Benefits in Urban China: Determinants and Impact on Income Inequality in 1988 and 2002," WIDER Working Paper Series RP2006-117, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    6. Ling, Davina C., 2009. "Do the Chinese "Keep up with the Jones"?: Implications of peer effects, growing economic disparities and relative deprivation on health outcomes among older adults in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 65-81, March.
    7. Coes, Donald V., 2008. "Income distribution trends in Brazil and China: Evaluating absolute and relative economic growth," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 359-369, May.
    8. Francesco Schettino & Alberto Gabriele, 2008. "Child malnutrition and mortality in China and Vietnam in a comparative perspective," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 41(1), pages 29-59, March.
    9. Wu, Ximing & Perloff, Jeffrey M., 2005. "GMM Estimation of a Maximum Distribution With Interval Data," Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series qt7jf5w1ht, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley.
    10. James K. Galbraith & Ludmila Krytynskaia & Qifei Wang, 2004. "The Experience of Rising Inequality in Russia and China during the Transition," European Journal of Comparative Economics, Cattaneo University (LIUC), vol. 1(1), pages 87-106, June.
    11. Alberto, Gabriele & Schettino, Francesco, 2006. "Child Mortality In China And Vietnam In A Comparative Perspective," MPRA Paper 3987, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Dec 2006.
    12. Zhongwei Zhao, 2006. "Income Inequality, Unequal Health Care Access, and Mortality in China," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 32(3), pages 461-483, September.
    13. Khor, Niny & Pencavel, John, 2008. "Measuring Income Mobility, Income Inequality, and Social Welfare for Households of the People’s Republic of China," ADB Economics Working Paper Series 145, Asian Development Bank.
    14. Staley, Mark, 2018. "The Knowledge-Diffusion Bottleneck in Economic Growth and Development," MPRA Paper 87255, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Tang, Peng & Feng, Yue & Li, Min & Zhang, Yanyan, 2021. "Can the performance evaluation change from central government suppress illegal land use in local governments? A new interpretation of Chinese decentralisation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    16. van der Kamp, Denise & Lorentzen, Peter & Mattingly, Daniel, 2017. "Racing to the Bottom or to the Top? Decentralization, Revenue Pressures, and Governance Reform in China," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 164-176.
    17. Jorge Pablo Puig & Alberto Porto, 2021. "On the interaction between own revenues and intergovernmental transfers. Evidence from Argentinean local governments," Asociación Argentina de Economía Política: Working Papers 4508, Asociación Argentina de Economía Política.
    18. Yongzheng Liu & Jorge Martinez-Vazquez & Baoyun Qiao, 2014. "Falling Short: Intergovernmental Transfers in China," International Center for Public Policy Working Paper Series, at AYSPS, GSU paper1423, International Center for Public Policy, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University.
    19. Yihua Yu & Jing Wang & Xi Tian, 2016. "Identifying the Flypaper Effect in the Presence of Spatial Dependence: Evidence from Education in China's Counties," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(1), pages 93-110, March.
    20. Jing Xing & Clemens Fuest, 2018. "Central-local government fiscal relations and cyclicality of public spending: evidence from China," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 25(4), pages 946-980, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mof:journl:ppr027g. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Policy Research Institute (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/prigvjp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.