IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mig/mdjrnl/v2y2023i1p49-64.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of Civil Society Organisations’ thematical representation at the ASEAN Forum on Migrant Labour (AMFL): A Disability Lens

Author

Listed:
  • Benjamin Thatcher

    (University of the Philippines Diliman, Philippines)

Abstract

The development and migration nexus has expanded and been built from the foundations of a human rights framework. This fusion has significant implications within ASEAN, which is positioned to increase economic integration, triggering a transformation into a labour migration hub. Meaningful participation of all stakeholders becomes a necessity to fulfil the notion of inclusive development under a human rights paradigm. However, persons with disabilities and their representation are often only mentioned as an afterthought. This secondary research accompanied by a qualitative interview investigates how persons with disabilities are represented at Civil Society level and how recommendations in the AMFL interpret disability. Unfortunately, the findings suggest persons with disabilities do not have meaningful representation and when disability was mentioned it followed a medical or charity model narrative. This narrative normally took the form of an occupational safety or health services issue offering protection from disease or injury to prevent ‘suffering’ which should be covered by disability and medical insurance.

Suggested Citation

  • Benjamin Thatcher, 2023. "Analysis of Civil Society Organisations’ thematical representation at the ASEAN Forum on Migrant Labour (AMFL): A Disability Lens," Migration and Diversity, Transnational Press London, UK, vol. 2(1), pages 49-64, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:mig:mdjrnl:v:2:y:2023:i:1:p:49-64
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33182/md.v2i1.2836
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.tplondon.com/md/article/view/2836/2140
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.33182/md.v2i1.2836?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mig:mdjrnl:v:2:y:2023:i:1:p:49-64. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: TPLondon (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.tplondon.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.