IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/theord/v96y2024i4d10.1007_s11238-023-09959-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Independent postulates for subjective expected utility

Author

Listed:
  • Mikko Harju

    (Aalto University School of Science)

  • Juuso Liesiö

    (Aalto University School of Business)

  • Kai Virtanen

    (Aalto University School of Science
    National Defence University)

Abstract

Although the subjective expected utility (SEU) theory is more than 60 years old, it was recently discovered by Hartmann (Econometrica 88(1):203–205, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA17428 ) that one of the original seven postulates is redundant, i.e., it is implied by the other six postulates. In this brief communication, we show that this redundant axiom is the only one that is implied by the other axioms, thereby establishing that the remaining six postulates form an independent axiomatic system. This result further streamlines the preference assumptions underlying the SEU theory.

Suggested Citation

  • Mikko Harju & Juuso Liesiö & Kai Virtanen, 2024. "Independent postulates for subjective expected utility," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 96(4), pages 597-606, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:theord:v:96:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s11238-023-09959-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s11238-023-09959-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11238-023-09959-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11238-023-09959-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:theord:v:96:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s11238-023-09959-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.