Author
Abstract
This paper begins by asking if a rational choice explanation of revolution is possible. I note ?rst and analyse critically the interesting recent literature on revolution developed mainly by sociologists with reference to the East German, Iranian and other contemporary revolutions. My own approach to this question starts by distinguishing between individual and collective rationality. In analysing revolutions (as distinct from riots, strikes, or other forms of collective action), I have argued that the second type is logically prior to the ?rst, that is, one cannot look at the incentives facing an individual potential leader or follower of a revolutionary movement without considering ?rst what type of state is being faced and whether it is strong or weak. The basic condition under which a rational revolution can occur is if the state has been weakened, so that the mechanisms which have sustained the ruler in o?ce no longer function e?ectively. If the state is weak, then leadership of revolutionary movements will tend to occur spontaneously. This, in turn, tends to make individual participation in revolutionary activity rational, as dynamic collective processes (cascades or bandwagon e?ects) may be set in motion by the prospect of success in overthrowing the government. I illustrate these arguments with the French Revolution. Finally, I ask if revolution could be collectively rational, not only in the sense that the current stateÆs ability to function is severely impaired, but in the sense that the regime which replaces it is expected to represent an improvement. I consider various criteria here û and ultimaltely suggest that one criterion may be adequate: that the revolution results in more democracy.
Suggested Citation
Ronald Wintrobe, 2004.
"The Rationale of Revolutions,"
Homo Oeconomicus, Institute of SocioEconomics, vol. 21, pages 171-196.
Handle:
RePEc:hom:homoec:v:21:y:2004:p:171-196
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
search for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hom:homoec:v:21:y:2004:p:171-196. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sohamde.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.