IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i10p4022-d1392415.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Root System Evolution Survey in a Multi-Approach Method for SWBE Monitoring: A Case Study in Tuscany (Italy)

Author

Listed:
  • Emanuele Giachi

    (Department of Agricultural, Food, Environmental and Forestry Science (DAGRI), University of Florence, Via di San Bonaventura, 50145 Firenze, Italy)

  • Yamuna Giambastiani

    (Bluebiloba Startup Innovativa SRL, Via C. Salutati 78, 50126 Florence, Italy
    ForTech Laboratorio Congiunto, University of Florence, 50145 Florence, Italy
    National Research Council, Institute of Bioeconomy, 50019 Florence, Italy)

  • Francesca Giannetti

    (Department of Agricultural, Food, Environmental and Forestry Science (DAGRI), University of Florence, Via di San Bonaventura, 50145 Firenze, Italy
    Bluebiloba Startup Innovativa SRL, Via C. Salutati 78, 50126 Florence, Italy
    ForTech Laboratorio Congiunto, University of Florence, 50145 Florence, Italy)

  • Andrea Dani

    (Department of Agricultural, Food, Environmental and Forestry Science (DAGRI), University of Florence, Via di San Bonaventura, 50145 Firenze, Italy)

  • Federico Preti

    (Department of Agricultural, Food, Environmental and Forestry Science (DAGRI), University of Florence, Via di San Bonaventura, 50145 Firenze, Italy
    ForTech Laboratorio Congiunto, University of Florence, 50145 Florence, Italy
    Associazione Italiana per l’Ingegneria Naturalistica, Via San Bonaventura, 13, 50145 Florence, Italy)

Abstract

Land degradation and soil erosion, intensified by frequent intense hydro-meteorological events, pose significant threats to ecological processes. In response to the environmental challenges, there is a growing emphasis on employing Nature-Based Solutions (NBS), such as Soil and Water Bioengineering (SWBE) techniques, which promote a sustainable approach and materials for the restoration of natural areas damaged by climate events, unlike traditional “grey” engineering works. However, the effective implementation of SWBE interventions requires a multidisciplinary monitoring approach, considering engineering, geological, ecological, biological, and landscape aspects. The success of these interventions depends on evaluating both short-term stabilities provided by the non-living supporting structure and the long-term development of vegetation introduced during the work. Monitoring should regard structural integrity assessments, vegetation evolution studies, and analyses of root system efficiency (distribution, mechanical characteristics, etc.). This study wants to fill the research gap in SWBE management by proposing a comparison of two study techniques for a root system development evaluation, within a multi-approach methodology for the assessment of these interventions in terms of soil stability and natural evolution. The paper provides insights into geotechnical analysis within a shallow landslide, comparing two different methods for the evaluation of root system evolution. Direct methods (RAR) and indirect methods (ERT) were used for root development monitoring and then compared. Vegetation development was assessed by NDVI parameter by analysing Landsat satellite images. An overall analysis of the data obtained from monitoring the study area shows good plant development, thanks to the SWBE intervention, which in addition to the slope stability effect contributes to better water regulation and initiates a natural ecological succession. The findings contribute to advancing the understanding of the effectiveness of SWBE techniques, offering valuable information for future bioengineering projects and environmental conservation efforts, and promoting them as sustainable techniques for natural recovery.

Suggested Citation

  • Emanuele Giachi & Yamuna Giambastiani & Francesca Giannetti & Andrea Dani & Federico Preti, 2024. "Root System Evolution Survey in a Multi-Approach Method for SWBE Monitoring: A Case Study in Tuscany (Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-16, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:10:p:4022-:d:1392415
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/10/4022/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/10/4022/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:10:p:4022-:d:1392415. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.