IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i23p6828-d293036.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamic Optimized Cleaner Production Strategies to Improve Water Environment and Economic Development in Leather Industrial Parks: A Case Study in Xinji, China

Author

Listed:
  • Xianying Li

    (School of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China
    The co-first authors: Xianying Li, Feng Xu.)

  • Feng Xu

    (School of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China
    The co-first authors: Xianying Li, Feng Xu.)

  • Nan Xiang

    (College of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China)

  • Yating Wang

    (School of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China)

  • Yingkui Zhang

    (School of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China)

Abstract

The leather industry has contributed significantly to economic development, but serious water environmental problems have arisen due to manufacturing processes in this industry. The leather industry must implement sustainable development by improving cleaner production capabilities under the Chinese ecological development background. The Xinji industrial park in China has the largest leather production base in which the leather industry is the leading industry that contributes nearly 50% of economic gains. This study investigated optimal cleaner production strategies for the leather industrial park by adopting an improved multi-objective simulation approach integrating the environmentally extended input–output and system dynamics models. Simulations were able to estimate the socio-economic and water environment development of the Xinji industrial park from 2015 to 2025. Adopting cleaner approaches, including production efficiency enhancing, sewage pre-treatment facility construction in leather companies, and reclaimed water recycling, simulation results indicated that, with steady economic growth (optimal 7.7% annual growth rate), it is possible to conserve 18% of the water resources, with an 80 % and 90% reduction for the chemical oxygen demand (COD), ammonia (NH 3 -N) water pollutant emission intensity, respectively. The cleaner development path and measures analyzed in this study are of great significance to promote the sustainable development of leather industrial parks.

Suggested Citation

  • Xianying Li & Feng Xu & Nan Xiang & Yating Wang & Yingkui Zhang, 2019. "Dynamic Optimized Cleaner Production Strategies to Improve Water Environment and Economic Development in Leather Industrial Parks: A Case Study in Xinji, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-18, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:23:p:6828-:d:293036
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/23/6828/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/23/6828/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ricardo J. Hernández Pardo & Tracy Bhamra & Ran Bhamra, 2012. "Sustainable Product Service Systems in Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs): Opportunities in the Leather Manufacturing Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-18, January.
    2. Luo, Li & Dzakpasu, Mawuli & Yang, Baichuan & Zhang, Wushou & Yang, Yahong & Wang, Xiaochang C., 2019. "A novel index of total oxygen demand for the comprehensive evaluation of energy consumption for urban wastewater treatment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 253-261.
    3. Matzen, Michael & Alhajji, Mahdi & Demirel, Yaşar, 2015. "Chemical storage of wind energy by renewable methanol production: Feasibility analysis using a multi-criteria decision matrix," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P1), pages 343-353.
    4. Franco, Juan Agustín & Gaspar, Paula & Mesias, Francisco Javier, 2012. "Economic analysis of scenarios for the sustainability of extensive livestock farming in Spain under the CAP," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 120-129.
    5. Ramsey A. Wright & Raymond P. Côté & Jack Duffy & John Brazner, 2009. "Diversity and Connectance in an Industrial Context," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 13(4), pages 551-564, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bryony M. Bowman & Dexter V. L. Hunt & Chris D. F. Rogers, 2022. "Gazing into the Crystal Ball: A Review of Futures Analysis to Promote Environmental Justice in the UK Water Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-18, April.
    2. Wuliyasu Bai & Liang Yan & Jingbo Liang & Long Zhang, 2022. "Mapping Knowledge Domain on Economic Growth and Water Sustainability: A Scientometric Analysis," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(11), pages 4137-4159, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wunhong Su & Liuzhen Zhang & Chao Ge & Shuai Chen, 2022. "Association between Internal Control and Sustainability: A Literature Review Based on the SOX Act Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-30, August.
    2. Kim, Dongin & Han, Jeehoon, 2020. "Techno-economic and climate impact analysis of carbon utilization process for methanol production from blast furnace gas over Cu/ZnO/Al2O3 catalyst," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    3. Beatrice Lerma & Doriana Dal Palù & Marco Actis Grande & Claudia De Giorgi, 2017. "Could Black Be the New Gold? Design-Driven Challenges in New Sustainable Luxury Materials for Jewelry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, December.
    4. Kai Ding & Pingyu Jiang & Mei Zheng, 2017. "Environmental and economic sustainability-aware resource service scheduling for industrial product service systems," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 28(6), pages 1303-1316, August.
    5. Shaofei Jiang & Di Feng & Chunfu Lu, 2019. "A Sustainable Innovation—Additional Services for Products Based on Personalised Customer Value," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-16, March.
    6. Shen, Lei & Sun, Wanqin & Parida, Vinit, 2023. "Consolidating digital servitization research: A systematic review, integrative framework, and future research directions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    7. Bolette Bele & Ann Norderhaug & Hanne Sickel, 2018. "Localized Agri-Food Systems and Biodiversity," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-17, February.
    8. Jensen, Paul D., 2016. "The role of geospatial industrial diversity in the facilitation of regional industrial symbiosis," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 92-103.
    9. Zhu, Wenjing & Duan, Cuncun & Chen, Bin, 2024. "Energy efficiency assessment of wastewater treatment plants in China based on multiregional input–output analysis and data envelopment analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 356(C).
    10. Rahmat, Yoga & Maier, Simon & Moser, Francisco & Raab, Moritz & Hoffmann, Christian & Repke, Jens-Uwe & Dietrich, Ralph-Uwe, 2023. "Techno-economic and exergy analysis of e-methanol production under fixed operating conditions in Germany," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 351(C).
    11. Gloria P. Rios & Sergio Botero, 2020. "An Integrated Indicator to Analyze Sustainability in Specialized Dairy Farms in Antioquia—Colombia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-15, November.
    12. Yan, Peng & Shi, Hong-Xin & Chen, You-Peng & Gao, Xu & Fang, Fang & Guo, Jin-Song, 2020. "Optimization of recovery and utilization pathway of chemical energy from wastewater pollutants by a net-zero energy wastewater treatment model," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    13. Crivellari, Anna & Cozzani, Valerio & Dincer, Ibrahim, 2019. "Exergetic and exergoeconomic analyses of novel methanol synthesis processes driven by offshore renewable energies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    14. Ma, Qian & Chang, Yuan & Yuan, Bo & Song, Zhaozheng & Xue, Jinjun & Jiang, Qingzhe, 2022. "Utilizing carbon dioxide from refinery flue gas for methanol production: System design and assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    15. Mehdi Sharif Shourjeh & Przemysław Kowal & Jakub Drewnowski & Bartosz Szeląg & Aleksandra Szaja & Grzegorz Łagód, 2020. "Mutual Interaction between Temperature and DO Set Point on AOB and NOB Activity during Shortcut Nitrification in a Sequencing Batch Reactor in Terms of Energy Consumption Optimization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-21, November.
    16. Oner, Oytun & Khalilpour, Kaveh, 2022. "Evaluation of green hydrogen carriers: A multi-criteria decision analysis tool," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    17. Fabiana Liar Agudo & Barbara Stolte Bezerra & José Alcides Gobbo & Luis Alberto Bertolucci Paes, 2022. "Unfolding research themes for industrial symbiosis and underlying theories," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(6), pages 1682-1702, December.
    18. Ricardo J Hernandez & Constanza Miranda & Julian Goñi, 2020. "Empowering Sustainable Consumption by Giving Back to Consumers the ‘Right to Repair’," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-15, January.
    19. Parra-López, Carlos & Sayadi, Samir & Garcia-Garcia, Guillermo & Ben Abdallah, Saker & Carmona-Torres, Carmen, 2023. "Prioritising conservation actions towards the sustainability of the dehesa by integrating the demands of society," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    20. Laurence Delattre & Marta Debolini & Jean Christophe Paoli & Claude Napoleone & Michel Moulery & Lara Leonelli & Pierre Santucci, 2020. "Understanding the Relationships between Extensive Livestock Systems, Land-Cover Changes, and CAP Support in Less-Favored Mediterranean Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-20, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:23:p:6828-:d:293036. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.