IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i5p632-d1390209.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Climate Warming Benefits Plant Growth but Not Net Carbon Uptake: Simulation of Alaska Tundra and Needle Leaf Forest Using LPJ-GUESS

Author

Listed:
  • Cui Liu

    (College of Geography and Environmental Science, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, China)

  • Chuanhua Li

    (College of Geography and Environmental Science, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, China
    Cryosphere Research Station on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, State Key Laboratory of Cryospheric Science, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China)

  • Liangliang Li

    (College of Geography and Environmental Science, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, China)

Abstract

Climate warming significantly impacts Arctic vegetation, yet its future role as a carbon sink or source is unclear. We analyzed vegetation growth and carbon exchange in Alaska’s tundra and needle leaf forests using the LPJ-GUESS model. The accuracy of the model is verified using linear regression of the measured data from 2004 to 2008, and the results are significantly correlated, which proves that the model is reliable, with R 2 values of 0.51 and 0.46, respectively, for net ecosystem carbon exchange (NEE) at the tundra and needle leaf forest sites, and RMSE values of 22.85 and 23.40 gC/m 2 /yr for the tundra and needle forest sites, respectively. For the gross primary production (GPP), the R 2 values were 0.66 and 0.85, and the RMSE values were 39.25 and 43.75 gC/m 2 /yr at the tundra and needle leaf forest sites, respectively. We simulated vegetation carbon exchanges for 1992–2014 and projected future exchanges for 2020–2100 using climate variables. Under SSP1-2.6, SSP2-4.5, and SSP5-8.5 scenarios, GPP values increase with higher emissions, while the NEE showed great fluctuations without significant differences among the three pathways. Our results showed although climate warming can benefit vegetation growth, net carbon assimilation by vegetation may not increase accordingly in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Cui Liu & Chuanhua Li & Liangliang Li, 2024. "Climate Warming Benefits Plant Growth but Not Net Carbon Uptake: Simulation of Alaska Tundra and Needle Leaf Forest Using LPJ-GUESS," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-16, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:5:p:632-:d:1390209
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/5/632/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/5/632/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Satyendra Kumar & Bhaskar Narjary & Vivekanand & Adlul Islam & R. K. Yadav & S. K. Kamra, 2022. "Modeling climate change impact on groundwater and adaptation strategies for its sustainable management in the Karnal district of Northwest India," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 173(1), pages 1-30, July.
    2. J. Cohen & X. Zhang & J. Francis & T. Jung & R. Kwok & J. Overland & T. J. Ballinger & U. S. Bhatt & H. W. Chen & D. Coumou & S. Feldstein & H. Gu & D. Handorf & G. Henderson & M. Ionita & M. Kretschm, 2020. "Divergent consensuses on Arctic amplification influence on midlatitude severe winter weather," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 20-29, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alec P. Bennett & Troy J. Bouffard & Uma S. Bhatt, 2022. "Arctic Sea Ice Decline and Geoengineering Solutions: Cascading Security and Ethical Considerations," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, May.
    2. James E. Overland, 2021. "Rare events in the Arctic," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 168(3), pages 1-13, October.
    3. Qian Li & Liutong Chen & Zhengtao Yan & Yingjun Xu, 2022. "Exploration of Copula Models Use in Risk Assessment for Freezing and Snow Events: A Case Study in Southern China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-12, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:5:p:632-:d:1390209. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.