IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i7p1069-d862064.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social Capital, Crop Specialization and Rural Industry Development—Taking the Grape Industry in Ningling County of China as an Example

Author

Listed:
  • Nalin Wu

    (The College of Geography and Environment Science, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China)

  • Erling Li

    (The College of Geography and Environment Science, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China)

  • Yihan Su

    (School of Journalism and Communication, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China)

  • Li Li

    (Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China)

  • Li Wang

    (The College of Geography and Environment Science, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China)

Abstract

Village-level social capital is an important factor to promote rural revitalization, but it is often ignored by existing researches. Based on the field investigation on 357 grape industry villages in Ningling County of Henan Province, decomposed village social capital into three dimensions (social network, social norm and social trust), this paper aims to discuss how village social capital influences rural industry development by promoting crop specialization. Results showed that the social network affects the transmission of grape planting information and technology. The richer the social network, the faster the diffusion of grape planting and the faster the realization of crop specialization. However, different types of social network play different roles. Social norms affect whether villages participate in grape production decisions. Proper risk awareness and efficient and reliable social organization services can help village farmers participate in grape planting and improve the level of crop specialization. Social trust affects the scale and duration of grape planting in a village; that is, the higher the level of social trusts, the higher the degree of crop specialization. In short, social capital can effectively promote the rapid cultivation of superior crops, enhance the specialization level of agricultural production and drive the coordinated development of upstream and downstream industries, thereby promoting the development of rural industries. This study emphasizes that, in the process of rural revitalization, developing countries should consider the social environments of different regions, fully mobilize the power of local social capital and develop reasonable and feasible technology popularization, adoption and implementation programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Nalin Wu & Erling Li & Yihan Su & Li Li & Li Wang, 2022. "Social Capital, Crop Specialization and Rural Industry Development—Taking the Grape Industry in Ningling County of China as an Example," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-22, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:7:p:1069-:d:862064
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/7/1069/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/7/1069/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bin Wu & Jules Pretty, 2004. "Social connectedness in marginal rural China: The case of farmer innovation circles in Zhidan, north Shaanxi," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 21(1), pages 81-92, March.
    2. Pinilla Vicente & Sáez Luis Antonio, 2021. "What Do Public Policies Teach us About Rural Depopulation: The Case Study of Spain," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 13(2), pages 330-351, June.
    3. Konstantina Ntassiou, 2022. "Studying abandoned settlements’ renaissance in the context of rural geography: perspectives for Prespes, Greece," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(2), pages 359-383, February.
    4. Levien, Michael, 2015. "Social Capital as Obstacle to Development: Brokering Land, Norms, and Trust in Rural India," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 77-92.
    5. MA, Xin & TIAN, Zhihong & GONG, Qianwen, 2015. "Empirical Studies of the Factors Influencing Farmers' Enthusiasm for Growing Grain," Asian Agricultural Research, USA-China Science and Culture Media Corporation, vol. 7(02), pages 1-6, February.
    6. Marcos Carchano & Inmaculada Carrasco & Sebastián Castillo & M. Carmen García-Cortijo, 2021. "The Social Economy as a Factor of Economic Development and Resilience of Population in Rural Areas. A Study of Mediating Effects in Castilla-La Mancha (Spain)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-19, May.
    7. Wu, Bin & Liu, Linghui, 2020. "Social capital for rural revitalization in China: A critical evaluation on the government’s new countryside programme in Chengdu," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    8. Takeshima, Hiroyuki & Kumar, Anjani, 2020. "Changing returns-to-scale and deepening of factor-endowments-induced specialization: Exploring broader linkage between agricultural mechanization and agricultural transformation in Nepal," IFPRI discussion papers 1934, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    9. Ge, Dazhuan & Long, Hualou & Zhang, Yingnan & Ma, Li & Li, Tingting, 2018. "Farmland transition and its influences on grain production in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 94-105.
    10. Jiao Yan & Chunlai Chen & Biliang Hu, 2018. "Farm size and production efficiency in Chinese agriculture: output and profit," China Agricultural Economic Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 11(1), pages 20-38, September.
    11. Shi Zheng & Zhigang Wang & Titus O. Awokuse, 2012. "Determinants of Producers' Participation in Agricultural Cooperatives: Evidence from Northern China," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 34(1), pages 167-186.
    12. John A. Baker, 1965. "A Rural Renaissance in America," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(1), pages 84-84, January.
    13. Viñas Carmen Delgado, 2019. "Depopulation Processes in European Rural Areas: A Case Study of Cantabria (Spain)," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 11(3), pages 341-369, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yiru Wang & Honggang Lu & Yuge Chen & Peiwen Yang & Xiangbo Cheng & Fangting Xie, 2023. "The Impact of Farmland Management Rights Mortgage Loan on the Agri-Food Industrial Agglomeration: Case of Hubei Province," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-17, July.
    2. Lingjingyuan Xu & Jianming Yao, 2022. "Supply Chain Scheduling Optimization in an Agricultural Socialized Service Platform Based on the Coordination Degree," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-20, December.
    3. Jiang Zhu & Xiang Li & Huiming Huang & Xiangdong Yin & Jiangchun Yao & Tao Liu & Jiexuan Wu & Zhangcheng Chen, 2023. "Spatiotemporal Evolution of Carbon Emissions According to Major Function-Oriented Zones: A Case Study of Guangdong Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-20, January.
    4. Yinrong Chen & Yanqing Qin & Qingying Zhu, 2023. "Study on the Impact of Social Capital on Agricultural Land Transfer Decision: Based on 1017 Questionnaires in Hubei Province," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-22, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thomas Dax & Andrew Copus, 2022. "European Rural Demographic Strategies: Foreshadowing Post-Lisbon Rural Development Policy?," World, MDPI, vol. 3(4), pages 1-19, November.
    2. Dinesh Dhakal & David O’Brien & Peter Mueser, 2021. "Government Policy and Performance of Agricultural Cooperatives: A Case Study in Chitwan District, Nepal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-20, November.
    3. Liu, Yansui & Zhou, Yang, 2021. "Territory spatial planning and national governance system in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    4. Xiaowei Yao & Ting Luo & Yingjun Xu & Wanxu Chen & Jie Zeng, 2022. "Prediction of Spatiotemporal Changes in Sloping Cropland in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River Region under Different Scenarios," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-22, December.
    5. Xinyao Li & Lingzhi Wang & Bryan Pijanowski & Lingpeng Pan & Hichem Omrani & Anqi Liang & Yi Qu, 2022. "The Spatio-Temporal Pattern and Transition Mode of Recessive Cultivated Land Use Morphology in the Huaibei Region of the Jiangsu Province," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-16, November.
    6. Bunga Hidayati & Naoyuki Yamamoto & Hideyuki Kano & Agus Suman & Asfi Manzilati, 2017. "Social Capital in Moneylenders Phenomenon in Blimbing Traditional Market Malang Indonesia," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 7(3), pages 57-61.
    7. Cieslik, Katarzyna, 2016. "Moral Economy Meets Social Enterprise Community-Based Green Energy Project in Rural Burundi," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 12-26.
    8. Raisa Țăruș & Ștefan Dezsi & Florin Pop, 2021. "Ageing Urban Population Prognostic between 2020 and 2050 in Transylvania Region (Romania)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-20, September.
    9. Sun, Xueqing & Xiang, Pengcheng & Cong, Kexin, 2023. "Research on early warning and control measures for arable land resource security," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    10. Jasper GRASHUIS & Ye SU, 2019. "A Review Of The Empirical Literature On Farmer Cooperatives: Performance, Ownership And Governance, Finance, And Member Attitude," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 90(1), pages 77-102, March.
    11. Yang Chen & Zhenqi Hu & Pengyu Li & Gensheng Li & Dongzhu Yuan & Jiaxin Guo, 2022. "Assessment and Effect of Mining Subsidence on Farmland in Coal–Crop Overlapped Areas: A Case of Shandong Province, China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, August.
    12. Zhang, Xingping & Luo, Kaiyan & Tan, Qinliang, 2016. "A feedstock supply model integrating the official organization for China's biomass generation plants," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 276-290.
    13. Yajuan Wang & Xi Wu & Hongbo Zhu, 2022. "Spatio-Temporal Pattern and Spatial Disequilibrium of Cultivated Land Use Efficiency in China: An Empirical Study Based on 342 Prefecture-Level Cities," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-15, October.
    14. Lu Cai & Chaoqing Chai & Bangbang Zhang & Feng Yang & Wei Wang & Chengdong Zhang, 2022. "The Theoretical Approach and Practice of Farmland Rights System Reform from Decentralization to Centralization Promoting Agricultural Modernization: Evidence from Yuyang District in Shaanxi, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-16, December.
    15. Chuanming Sun & Guoxin Tan & Xingyu Chai & Haiqing Zhang, 2023. "Analysis on the Satisfaction of Public Cultural Service by Township Residents: A Qualitative Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-23, April.
    16. Kartik Misra, 2019. "Accumulation by Dispossession and Electoral Democracies : An Analysis of Land Acquisition for Special Economic Zones in India," UMASS Amherst Economics Working Papers 2019-16, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Department of Economics.
    17. Lucia Dalla Pellegrina & Angela De Michele & Giorgio Di Maio & Paolo Landoni & Susanna Parravicini, 2021. "Group Meeting Frequency and Borrowers’ Repayment Performance in Microfinance: Evidence from a Quasi-natural Experiment in South Africa," Journal of African Economies, Centre for the Study of African Economies, vol. 30(5), pages 447-477.
    18. Nlerum, Franklin E. & Ogu, Patience I., 2014. "Role of Farmers' Cooperative Societies in Rural Development in Nigeria," Journal of Rural Cooperation, Hebrew University, Center for Agricultural Economic Research, vol. 42(2), pages 1-10.
    19. Michael Schwind & Uwe Altrock, 2023. "Negotiating Land in Rurban Bengaluru, South India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-17, February.
    20. Lin Li & Hongdong Guo, 2019. "The impact of business relationships on safe production behavior by farmers: Evidence from China," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(1), pages 84-96, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:7:p:1069-:d:862064. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.