IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i8p2911-d349289.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceptions on Connecting Respite Care Volunteers and Caregivers

Author

Listed:
  • Solange Campos-Romero

    (School of Nursing, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 8940000, Chile)

  • Valeria Herskovic

    (Department of Computer Science, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 8940000, Chile)

  • Carolina Fuentes

    (School of Computer Science, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG8 1BB, UK
    School of Computer Science & Informatics, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF24 3AA, Wales, UK)

  • Esmeralda Abarca

    (School of Nursing, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 8940000, Chile)

Abstract

The most common requirement for informal caregivers is to experience a respite or temporary break from their caregiving routine. Some initiatives have been undertaken to provide respite care through volunteer providers. We report on a qualitative study carried out in Santiago, Chile, to learn about the willingness of potential volunteers to provide respite care for bedridden older persons, as well as their willingness to use information and communication technologies (ICT) to connect to caregivers in a low-income neighbourhood within their own geographic district. A trustworthy institution that mediates the volunteer–caregiver relationship is considered to be important by potential volunteers. Potential volunteers were found to be willing to use ICT to provide respite care, sharing basic information about themselves. However, they were also aware of the digital skill gap that may exist between them and the caregivers and were distrustful of unknown websites that could connect them to care recipients.

Suggested Citation

  • Solange Campos-Romero & Valeria Herskovic & Carolina Fuentes & Esmeralda Abarca, 2020. "Perceptions on Connecting Respite Care Volunteers and Caregivers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-12, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:8:p:2911-:d:349289
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/8/2911/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/8/2911/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anheier, Helmut K. & Kendall, Jeremy, 2000. "Trust and voluntary organisations: three theoretical approaches," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 29035, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Dusan Paredes & Victor Iturra & Marcelo Lufin, 2016. "A Spatial Decomposition of Income Inequality in Chile," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(5), pages 771-789, May.
    3. Susan Leigh Star & Karen Ruhleder, 1996. "Steps Toward an Ecology of Infrastructure: Design and Access for Large Information Spaces," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 7(1), pages 111-134, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Tilson & Kalle Lyytinen & Carsten Sørensen, 2010. "Research Commentary ---Digital Infrastructures: The Missing IS Research Agenda," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 748-759, December.
    2. Emmanuelle Vaast & Geoff Walsham, 2009. "Trans-Situated Learning: Supporting a Network of Practice with an Information Infrastructure," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 547-564, December.
    3. Pradeep Racherla & Munir Mandviwalla, 2013. "Moving from Access to Use of the Information Infrastructure: A Multilevel Sociotechnical Framework," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 709-730, September.
    4. Miguel A. Márquez & Elena Lasarte & Marcelo Lufin, 2019. "The Role of Neighborhood in the Analysis of Spatial Economic Inequality," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 141(1), pages 245-273, January.
    5. Cass, Noel & Schwanen, Tim & Shove, Elizabeth, 2018. "Infrastructures, intersections and societal transformations," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 160-167.
    6. Malcolm Wolski & Joanna Richardson, 2014. "A Model for Institutional Infrastructure to Support Digital Scholarship," Publications, MDPI, vol. 2(4), pages 1-17, September.
    7. Juan José Barrios, 2011. "Participation in voluntary organizations," Documentos de Investigación 70, Universidad ORT Uruguay. Facultad de Administración y Ciencias Sociales.
    8. Young, Meg & Katell, Michael & Krafft, P. M., 2019. "Municipal Surveillance Regulation and Algorithmic Accountability," SocArXiv zx2sw, Center for Open Science.
    9. Scott, Susan V. & Zachariadis, Markos, 2012. "Origins and development of SWIFT, 1973–2009," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 46490, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    10. Dietmar Offenhuber, 2019. "The platform and the bricoleur—Improvisation and smart city initiatives in Indonesia," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 46(8), pages 1565-1580, October.
    11. Rebecca Vine, 2020. "Riskwork in the construction of Heathrow Terminal 2," SPRU Working Paper Series 2020-20, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    12. Pflueger, Dane & Palermo, Tommaso & Martinez, Daniel, 2019. "Thinking infrastructure and the organization of markets: the creation of a legal market for cannabis in Colorado," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 91412, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    13. Aula, Ville, 2019. "Institutions, infrastructures, and data friction – reforming secondary use of health data in Finland," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 101454, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    14. Cagdas Dedeoglu & Cansu Ekmekcioglu, 2020. "Information Infrastructures and the Future of Ecological Citizenship in the Anthropocene," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-17, January.
    15. Hyysalo, Sampsa & Usenyuk, Svetlana, 2015. "The user dominated technology era: Dynamics of dispersed peer-innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 560-576.
    16. Boyer O’Leary, Michael & Wilson, Jeanne M. & Metiu, Anca, 2011. "Beyond Being There: The Symbolic Role of Communication and Identification in the Emergence of Perceived Proximity in Geographically Dispersed Work," ESSEC Working Papers WP1112, ESSEC Research Center, ESSEC Business School.
    17. Yasna Cortés, 2021. "Spatial Accessibility to Local Public Services in an Unequal Place: An Analysis from Patterns of Residential Segregation in the Metropolitan Area of Santiago, Chile," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-20, January.
    18. Steger, Cara & Hirsch, Shana & Evers, Cody & Branoff, Benjamin & Petrova, Maria & Nielsen-Pincus, Max & Wardropper, Chloe & van Riper, Carena J., 2018. "Ecosystem Services as Boundary Objects for Transdisciplinary Collaboration," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 153-160.
    19. Robert Shaw, 2014. "Streetlighting in England and Wales: New Technologies and Uncertainty in the Assemblage of Streetlighting Infrastructure," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(9), pages 2228-2242, September.
    20. Jenny Bossaller & Anthony J. Million, 2023. "The research data life cycle, legacy data, and dilemmas in research data management," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 74(6), pages 701-706, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:8:p:2911-:d:349289. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.