IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxivy2021ispecial1p69-75.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Small Firm’s Cooperation for Innovation with other Firms and Research Units - Whether the Partner Matters for Product, Process, Marketing and Organizational Innovations?

Author

Listed:
  • K. Sachpazidu-Wojcicka

Abstract

Purpose: The main purpose of the article is to determine the relationship between the firms’ cooperation for innovation, as well as with other firms and research units. It was important to determine the cooperation partners influence on firms’ innovations – product, process, marketing, and organization. Design/Methodology/Approach: The study is based on a small firm survey (n=63) located in Poland. The research model defines the relationship between firms’ cooperation and product, process, marketing, and organizational innovations. The multi stepwise regression modeling was used in the study and SPSS software. Findings: According to the survey, there is a positive relationship between cooperation for innovation and marketing innovations only in the case of small firms’ cooperation with other firms. All the rest types of innovation in the surveyed small firms are not determined by cooperation for innovation, non-horizontal and non-vertical. Practical implications: As small firms’ managers, practitioners should invest more effort in cooperation for innovations with partners such as other firms. Cooperation with research units is convenient in firms’ innovativeness performance but in the case of surveyed firms is not crucial cooperation in innovation activity. Originality/Value: That survey is one of the few studies examining the relationship between the small firms’ cooperation for innovation (with other firms and research units) and its influence on product, process, marketing, and organization innovations. The measurement of firms’ cooperation for innovation and the importance of the cooperating partners should be developed further as it is essential in the firms’ performance.

Suggested Citation

  • K. Sachpazidu-Wojcicka, 2021. "Small Firm’s Cooperation for Innovation with other Firms and Research Units - Whether the Partner Matters for Product, Process, Marketing and Organizational Innovations?," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 1), pages 69-75.
    • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:special1:p:69-75
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/2029/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nahom Ghebrihiwet, 2020. "Foreign direct investment and industry-science R&D cooperation: the case of South Africa," Innovation and Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 373-394, September.
    2. Mendi, Pedro & Moner-Colonques, Rafael & Sempere-Monerris, José J., 2020. "Cooperation for innovation and technology licensing: Empirical evidence from Spain," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    3. Barbara Bradac Hojnik & Miroslav Rebernik, 2012. "OUTSOURCING OF R&D AND INNOVATION ACTIVITIES IN SMEs: EVIDENCE FROM SLOVENIA," Economic Review: Journal of Economics and Business, University of Tuzla, Faculty of Economics, vol. 10(2), pages 3-11.
    4. Utterback, James M & Abernathy, William J, 1975. "A dynamic model of process and product innovation," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 3(6), pages 639-656, December.
    5. Janeiro, Pedro & Proença, Isabel & Gonçalves, Vítor da Conceição, 2013. "Open innovation: Factors explaining universities as service firm innovation sources," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(10), pages 2017-2023.
    6. Ron A. Boschma & Koen Frenken, 2006. "Why is economic geography not an evolutionary science? Towards an evolutionary economic geography," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 6(3), pages 273-302, June.
    7. Gupta, Suraksha & Malhotra, Naresh K. & Czinkota, Michael & Foroudi, Pantea, 2016. "Marketing innovation: A consequence of competitiveness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 5671-5681.
    8. Hernández-Trasobares, Alejandro & Murillo-Luna, Josefina L., 2020. "The effect of triple helix cooperation on business innovation: The case of Spain," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michaela Trippl & Markus Grillitsch & Arne Isaksen & Tanja Sinozic, 2015. "Perspectives on Cluster Evolution: Critical Review and Future Research Issues," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(10), pages 2028-2044, October.
    2. Alessandra Colombelli & Nick von Tunzelmann, 2011. "The Persistence of Innovation and Path Dependence," Chapters, in: Cristiano Antonelli (ed.), Handbook on the Economic Complexity of Technological Change, chapter 4, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Giulio Carli & Andrea Morrison, 2018. "On the evolution of the Castel Goffredo hosiery cluster: a life cycle perspective," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(5), pages 915-932, May.
    4. Raphaël Suire & Jérôme Vicente, 2009. "Clusters for life or life cycles of clusters. From declining to resilient clusters," Post-Print halshs-00460129, HAL.
    5. Lee, Ryeowon & Lee, Jong-Ho & Garrett, Tony C., 2019. "Synergy effects of innovation on firm performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 507-515.
    6. Kim, Jikyoung & Kim, Wonjoon, 2022. "The intensity and diversity of R&D partner types and product development: Do product innovation types and industry sectors matter?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    7. Maureen McKelvey, 2016. "Firms navigating through innovation spaces: a conceptualization of how firms search and perceive technological, market and productive opportunities globally," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 785-802, October.
    8. Vladimir Komarov, 2012. "Main Principles of Innovation Theory," Published Papers 173, Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy, revised 2013.
    9. Christopher R. Esposito, 2020. "The Emergence of Knowledge Production in New Places," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2046, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Sep 2020.
    10. Rehák Štefan & Buček Milan & Hudec Oto, 2013. "Path dependency and path plasticity in emerging industries," ZFW – Advances in Economic Geography, De Gruyter, vol. 57(1-2), pages 52-66, October.
    11. Foroudi, Pantea & Yu, Qionglei & Gupta, Suraksha & Foroudi, Mohammad M., 2019. "Enhancing university brand image and reputation through customer value co-creation behaviour," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 218-227.
    12. Anna Herzog, 2022. "Imaginaries, directionalities, agency and new path creation [Imaginaries, directionalities, Akteurshandeln und Pfadkreation]," Review of Regional Research: Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft, Springer;Gesellschaft für Regionalforschung (GfR), vol. 42(3), pages 279-307, December.
    13. Roger Hayter & Klaus Edenhoffer, 2016. "Evolutionary Geography of a Mature Resource Sector: Shakeouts and Shakeins in British Columbia's Forest Industries 1980 to 2008," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(4), pages 497-519, December.
    14. Cristina Chaminade & Monica Plechero, 2015. "Do Regions Make a Difference? Regional Innovation Systems and Global Innovation Networks in the ICT Industry," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(2), pages 215-237, February.
    15. Kim, Jinhee & Lee, Keun, 2022. "Local–global interface as a key factor in the catching up of regional innovation systems: Fast versus slow catching up among Taipei, Shenzhen, and Penang in Asia," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    16. Cecere, Grazia & Corrocher, Nicoletta & Battaglia, Riccardo David, 2015. "Innovation and competition in the smartphone industry: Is there a dominant design?," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 162-175.
    17. Ieda Margarete Oro & Carlos Eduardo Facin Lavarda, 2017. "Interaction Between Strategy and Organizational Performance: The Influence of Family Management," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 14(5), pages 493-509, September.
    18. Joao Carlos Lopes & Amélia Branco, 2013. "The Clustering of Cork Firms in Santa Maria da Feira: Why History Matters," International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, vol. 3(1), pages 354-354.
    19. Singh, Anuraag & Triulzi, Giorgio & Magee, Christopher L., 2021. "Technological improvement rate predictions for all technologies: Use of patent data and an extended domain description," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(9).
    20. Albert, Till & Moehrle, Martin G. & Meyer, Stefan, 2015. "Technology maturity assessment based on blog analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 196-209.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Cooperation for innovation; product innovation; process innovation; marketing innovation; organization innovation.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D
    • C00 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - General - - - General
    • L1 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:special1:p:69-75. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.