IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxiiiy2020i1p107-116.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multitasking Effects on Individual Performance: An Experimental Eye-Tracking Study

Author

Listed:
  • Malgorzata Marchewka
  • Janusz Nesterak
  • Mariusz Sołtysik
  • Wojciech Szymla
  • Magdalena Wojnarowska

Abstract

Purpose: The main objective of this research is to identify the impact of parallel performance of various tasks on the individual effectiveness. Moreover, a methodological goal was set for the research to explore the possibilities of using eye-tracking in the studies of multitasking. Design/Methodology/Approach: The study was conducted in the form of an experiment. All participants worked at the same computer station time was measured with Eye Tracker. Findings: It was confirmed that multitasking requires more time to accomplish tasks and deteriorates creativity, but not correctness of the answers in case of simple tasks. Interestingly, in case of multitasking under time pressure, the performance was worse. Practical Implications: Deeper understanding of the determinants and effects of multitasking on organizational and individual performance enables the adjustment of work organization and management style in order to achieve optimal results. Originality/Value: This paper brings new insights to the studies of multitasking not only in terms of the results of an experimental research, but also in terms of methodological concerns like eye-tracking as a new method of empirical diagnosis.

Suggested Citation

  • Malgorzata Marchewka & Janusz Nesterak & Mariusz Sołtysik & Wojciech Szymla & Magdalena Wojnarowska, 2020. "Multitasking Effects on Individual Performance: An Experimental Eye-Tracking Study," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 107-116.
    • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiii:y:2020:i:1:p:107-116
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ersj.eu/journal/1539/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sinan Aral & Erik Brynjolfsson & Marshall Van Alstyne, 2012. "Information, Technology, and Information Worker Productivity," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(3-part-2), pages 849-867, September.
    2. Nannerup, Niels & Olsen, Kasper Krogh, 2014. "Multitasking and performance measurement," Discussion Papers on Economics 20/2014, University of Southern Denmark, Department of Economics.
    3. Shingo Takahashi, 2011. "How Multi-Tasking Job Designs Affect Productivity: Evidence from the Australian Coal Mining Industry," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 64(5), pages 841-862, October.
    4. Nicholas G. Hall & Joseph Y.-T. Leung & Chung-Lun Li, 2015. "The Effects of Multitasking on Operations Scheduling," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 24(8), pages 1248-1265, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paulo B. Goes & Noyan Ilk & Mingfeng Lin & J. Leon Zhao, 2018. "When More Is Less: Field Evidence on Unintended Consequences of Multitasking," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(7), pages 3033-3054, July.
    2. Xiaoyun Xiong & Peng Zhou & Yunqiang Yin & T. C. E. Cheng & Dengfeng Li, 2019. "An exact branch‐and‐price algorithm for multitasking scheduling on unrelated parallel machines," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 66(6), pages 502-516, September.
    3. Yingjie Zhang & Beibei Li & Ramayya Krishnan, 2020. "Learning Individual Behavior Using Sensor Data: The Case of Global Positioning System Traces and Taxi Drivers," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(4), pages 1301-1321, December.
    4. Orozco, Luis Antonio & Sanabria, John Alirio & Sosa, Juan Camilo & Aristizabal, Jeimy & López, Liliana, 2022. "How do IT investments interact with other resources to improve innovation?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 358-365.
    5. Kuk, George & Schaarschmidt, Mario & Homscheid, Dirk, 2024. "All of the same breed? A networking perspective of private-collective innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    6. Ilse Lindenlaub & Anja Prummer, 2014. "Gender, Social Networks And Performance," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1461, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    7. Stephen Michael Impink & Andrea Prat & Raffaella Sadun, 2021. "Communication within firms: evidence from CEO turnovers," CEP Discussion Papers dp1796, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    8. Nisar, Tahir M. & Prabhakar, Guru & Strakova, Lubica, 2019. "Social media information benefits, knowledge management and smart organizations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 264-272.
    9. Tom Fangyun Tan & Serguei Netessine, 2020. "At Your Service on the Table: Impact of Tabletop Technology on Restaurant Performance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(10), pages 4496-4515, October.
    10. Velasco Vizcaíno, Franklin & Martin, Silvia L. & Cardenas, Juan J. & Cardenas, Marcelo, 2021. "Employees’ attitudes toward corporate social responsibility programs: The influence of corporate frugality and polychronicity organizational capabilities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 538-546.
    11. Dow, Kevin E. & Watson, Marcia Weidenmier & Shea, Vincent J., 2017. "Riding the waves of technology through the decades: The relation between industry-level information technology intensity and the cost of equity capital," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 18-28.
    12. Manoj Kumar Mohanty & Padma Charan Mishra & Alaka Samantaray, 2023. "The Relationship of Critical Success Factors of the Mineral Industry: A Study on India," Vision, , vol. 27(1), pages 119-134, February.
    13. Min Ji & Yingchun Zhang & Yuan Zhang & T. C. E. Cheng & Yiwei Jiang, 2022. "Single-machine multitasking scheduling with job efficiency promotion," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 44(1), pages 446-479, August.
    14. Xu, Shuling & Hall, Nicholas G., 2021. "Fatigue, personnel scheduling and operations: Review and research opportunities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(3), pages 807-822.
    15. Olivier Chatain & Philipp Meyer-Doyle, 2017. "Alleviating managerial dilemmas in human-capital-intensive firms through incentives: Evidence from M&A legal advisors," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(2), pages 232-254, February.
    16. Pankush Kalgotra & Ramesh Sharda & Roger McHaney, 2019. "Don’t Disturb Me! Understanding the Impact of Interruptions on Knowledge Work: an Exploratory Neuroimaging Study," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(5), pages 1019-1030, October.
    17. Hilal Atasoy & Rajiv D. Banker & Paul A. Pavlou, 2021. "Information Technology Skills and Labor Market Outcomes for Workers," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(2), pages 437-461, June.
    18. Tobias Stucki & Daniel Wochner, 2019. "Technological and organizational capital: Where complementarities exist," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(3), pages 458-487, June.
    19. Lien Vanbrabant & Kris Braekers & Katrien Ramaekers, 2021. "Improving emergency department performance by revising the patient–physician assignment process," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 783-845, September.
    20. Diwas Singh KC, 2014. "Does Multitasking Improve Performance? Evidence from the Emergency Department," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 16(2), pages 168-183, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Multitasking; individual performance; eye-tracking.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L2 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior
    • C91 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - Laboratory, Individual Behavior
    • M12 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Personnel Management; Executives; Executive Compensation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiii:y:2020:i:1:p:107-116. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.