IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/ijfirm/v10y2020i3p66-80.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

ASEAN Corporate Governance Scorecard and Firm Value

Author

Listed:
  • Alex Johanes Simamora

Abstract

Purpose: This research is aimed to examine the effect of ASEAN corporate governance scorecard on firm value. Design/Methodology/Approach: Research sample consists of 491 manufacture firms listed in stock market of Thailand, Singapore, Philippines, Indonesia, and Malaysia. ASEAN corporate governance scorecard is measured by dummy variable, which is big 50 and non-big 50 firm’s rank of highest ASEAN corporate governance scorecard. Firm value measured by Tobin’s Q. Hypothesis test uses country fixed-effect regression analysis. Findings: This research finds that the big 50 of highest ASEAN corporate governance scorecards have positive effect on firm value. Higher ASEAN corporate governance scorecard as improvement of rights of shareholders, equitable treatment of shareholders, role of stakeholders, disclosure and transparency, responsibilities of the board, will improve firm’s value. Practical Implications: Management could make firm policy about optimal corporate governance, so management could maximizes shareholders‘ wealth by firm value increasing. Investors, who have interest send their investment abroad especially in ASEAN, have to see condition of corporate governance of public-listed firms, so investors’ wealth could be maximized. Originality/Value: This research provides early evidence about new corporate governance formulation, especially in ASEAN, and its effect on firm value in stock markets in ASEAN.

Suggested Citation

  • Alex Johanes Simamora, 2020. "ASEAN Corporate Governance Scorecard and Firm Value," International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, vol. 10(3), pages 66-80.
    • Handle: RePEc:ers:ijfirm:v:10:y:2020:i:3:p:66-80
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journalfirm.com/journal/222/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bong‐Chan Kho & René M. Stulz & Francis E. Warnock, 2009. "Financial Globalization, Governance, and the Evolution of the Home Bias," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(2), pages 597-635, May.
    2. Michael C. Jensen, 2010. "Value Maximization, Stakeholder Theory, and the Corporate Objective Function," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 22(1), pages 32-42, January.
    3. Amar Gande & Christoph Schenzler & Lemma W Senbet, 2009. "Valuation effects of global diversification," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 40(9), pages 1515-1532, December.
    4. Mahmoud Mousavi Shiri & Mahdi Salehi & Ali Radbon, 2016. "A Study of Impact of Ownership Structure and Disclosure Quality on Information Asymmetry in Iran," Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers, , vol. 41(1), pages 51-60, March.
    5. Clara Xiaoling Chen & Hai Lu & Theodore Sougiannis, 2012. "The Agency Problem, Corporate Governance, and the Asymmetrical Behavior of Selling, General, and Administrative Costs," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(1), pages 252-282, March.
    6. Jeffrey S. Harrison & Douglas A. Bosse & Robert A. Phillips, 2010. "Managing for stakeholders, stakeholder utility functions, and competitive advantage," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 58-74, January.
    7. Alan Gregory & Julie Whittaker & Xiaojuan Yan, 2016. "Corporate Social Performance, Competitive Advantage, Earnings Persistence and Firm Value," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(1-2), pages 3-30, January.
    8. Martijn Cremers & Allen Ferrell, 2014. "Thirty Years of Shareholder Rights and Firm Value," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 69(3), pages 1167-1196, June.
    9. Rajah Rasiah & Asokkumar Malakolunthu, 2009. "Technological intensities and economic performance: a study of foreign and local electronics firms in Malaysia," Asia Pacific Business Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(2), pages 181-197, April.
    10. Jensen, Michael C. & Meckling, William H., 1976. "Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 305-360, October.
    11. repec:tpr:journl:edfpol:v:14:y:2015:i:2:p:71-90 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Geesun Lee & Jinho Jeong, 2016. "An Investigation of Global and Regional Integration of ASEAN Economic Community Stock Market: Dynamic Risk Decomposition Approach," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(9), pages 2069-2086, September.
    13. Nawaf Al-Maskati & André J. Bate & Gurmeet S. Bhabra & Robert Faff, 2015. "Diversification, corporate governance and firm value in small markets: evidence from New Zealand," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 55(3), pages 627-657, September.
    14. Asian Development Bank (ADB), 2014. "ASEAN Corporate Governance Scorecard: Country Reports and Assessments 2013-2014," ADB Reports RPT146415, Asian Development Bank (ADB), revised 24 Jun 2014.
    15. Mikko Zerni & Juha†Pekka Kallunki & Henrik Nilsson, 2010. "The Entrenchment Problem, Corporate Governance Mechanisms, and Firm Value," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 1169-1206, December.
    16. Deunden Nikomborirak, 2015. "The ASEAN Economic Community (AEC): Myths and Realities," Asian Economic Papers, MIT Press, vol. 14(2), pages 71-90, Summer.
    17. Wenhao Tan & Zhenpeng Ma, 2016. "Ownership, Internal Capital Market, and Financing Costs," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(5), pages 1259-1278, May.
    18. Andreas Charitou & Ifigenia Georgiou & Andreas Soteriou, 2016. "Corporate Governance, Board Composition, Director Expertise, and Value: The Case of Quality Excellence," Multinational Finance Journal, Multinational Finance Journal, vol. 20(3), pages 181-236, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Heino, Noora & Tuominen, Pasi & Jussila, Iiro, 2020. "Listed Family Firm Stakeholder Orientations: The Critical Role of Value-creating Family Factors," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 11(4).
    2. Jo, Hoje & Song, Moon H. & Tsang, Albert, 2016. "Corporate social responsibility and stakeholder governance around the world," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 42-69.
    3. Thomas J. Chemmanur & Dimitrios Gounopoulos & Panagiotis Koutroumpis & Yu Zhang, 2022. "CSR and Firm Survival: Evidence from the Climate and Pandemic Crises," Working Papers 935, Queen Mary University of London, School of Economics and Finance.
    4. Suzuki Yasushi & Hasan A K M Kamrul, 2018. "An Analysis of Codified Corporate Governance Practices in the Banking Industry: The Case Study of Bangladesh," Financial Internet Quarterly (formerly e-Finanse), Sciendo, vol. 14(3), pages 60-75, September.
    5. Xiaotao (Kelvin) Liu & Xiaoxia Liu & Colin D. Reid, 2019. "Stakeholder Orientations and Cost Management," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(1), pages 486-512, March.
    6. José-Luis Godos-Díez & Roberto Fernández-Gago & Laura Cabeza-García, 2019. "How Does Reciprocity Affect Undergraduate Student Orientation towards Stakeholders?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-15, October.
    7. Olufemi, O. Omotilewa & Osifalujo, B. Bunmi and Ogunwede & J. Kayode, 2023. "Stakeholders Conflicting Interest and Approach for Harmonization for Business Sustainability: Evidence from Limited Liability Companies in Nigeria," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(9), pages 21-33, September.
    8. Jo, Hoje & Song, Moon H. & Tsang, Albert, 2015. "Corporate social responsibility and stakeholder governance around the world," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 18-45.
    9. Mara Del Baldo, 2012. "Corporate social responsibility and corporate governance in Italian SMEs: the experience of some “spirited businesses”," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 16(1), pages 1-36, February.
    10. Scholtens, Bert, 2008. "A note on the interaction between corporate social responsibility and financial performance," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(1-2), pages 46-55, December.
    11. Ferrell, Allen & Liang, Hao & Renneboog, Luc, 2016. "Socially responsible firms," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(3), pages 585-606.
    12. Chakraborty, Atreya & Gao, Lucia Silva & Sheikh, Shahbaz, 2019. "Managerial risk taking incentives, corporate social responsibility and firm risk," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 58-72.
    13. Amar Gande & Kose John & Vinay B. Nair & Lemma W. Senbet, 2020. "Taxes, institutions, and innovation: Theory and international evidence," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 51(9), pages 1413-1442, December.
    14. Nicos A. Scordis & Yoshihiko Suzawa & Astrid Zwick & Lucia Ruckner, 2014. "Principles for Sustainable Insurance: Risk Management and Value," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 17(2), pages 265-276, September.
    15. Ben-Nasr, Hamdi & Ghouma, Hatem, 2018. "Employee welfare and stock price crash risk," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 700-725.
    16. Wulung Li & Ramachandran Natarajan & Yan Zhao & Kenneth Zheng, 2021. "The effect of management control mechanisms through risk-taking incentives on asymmetric cost behavior," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 56(1), pages 219-243, January.
    17. John K. Ashton & Stephen Letza, 2003. "The Differential Returns Offered by Mutually Owned and Proprietary UK Depository Institutions: 1993–2000," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 74(2), pages 183-204, June.
    18. Associate Prof. J.O Arumona & Associate Prof. Orbunde B.B & BELLO, Musibau, 2023. "Liquidity and Working Capital Management Practices on Firm Value of Listed Non-Financial Companies in Nigeria," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(11), pages 1049-1066, November.
    19. Gerard Farias & Christine Farias & Isabella Krysa & Joel Harmon, 2020. "Sustainability Mindsets for Strategic Management: Lifting the Yoke of the Neo-Classical Economic Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-14, August.
    20. Vasanthan Subramaniam & Shaista Wasiuzzaman, 2019. "Corporate diversification and dividend policy: empirical evidence from Malaysia," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 23(3), pages 735-758, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Corporate Governance scorecard; firm value; ASEAN; Tobin’s Q.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill
    • G34 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Mergers; Acquisitions; Restructuring; Corporate Governance
    • O16 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Financial Markets; Saving and Capital Investment; Corporate Finance and Governance

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:ijfirm:v:10:y:2020:i:3:p:66-80. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journalfirm.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.