IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ene/journl/y2013p28-34.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Criteria For The Classification Of Forest Resources As A Precondition Of Their Economic Evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Yaroslav Koval

    (Public Institution «Institute of Environmental Economics and Sustainable Development of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine»)

  • Irina Antonenko

    (Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics)

Abstract

Strategy regulation of forest resources also does not meet the requirements of market-oriented wood resource relations, in particular with regard to the distribution of ownership of forest resources. Satisfaction of the state and the population in forest resources and their socio-ecological functions of the lack of parametrical characteristics of these functions are provided in insufficient, causing complications develop basic directions for further development and growth of industry wood resource areas of the country. The classification criteria of forest resources and the criteria for a comprehensive economic evaluation as the main indicators of the system get the maximum possible benefit from their use, capitalization of the different components of the forest and to establish their value. Disclosed uses of performance criterion as the basis of integrated assessment of different components of the forest, without which mean that they are effective reproduction and bringing to market conditions management.

Suggested Citation

  • Yaroslav Koval & Irina Antonenko, 2013. "The Criteria For The Classification Of Forest Resources As A Precondition Of Their Economic Evaluation," Economics of Nature and the Environment, Mykhaylo Khvesyk, pages 28-34.
    • Handle: RePEc:ene:journl:y:2013:p:28-34
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://economics-of-nature.net/uploads/arhiv/2013/Koval.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ene:journl:y:2013:p:28-34. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ludmila Shashula (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://economics-of-nature.net/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.