IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transb/v40y2006i2p123-146.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A bi-level model of the relationship between transport and residential location

Author

Listed:
  • Chang, Justin Sueun
  • Mackett, Roger Laurence

Abstract

This paper explores a bid-rent network equilibrium model which represents the relationship between transport and residential location. The relationship is examined in terms of the competition of decision-makers for locations. The model discusses difficulties in addressing the characteristics of locations, particularly heterogeneity and indivisibility. A hedonic interpretation is included as a way to resolve these challenges. The model investigates the process in which households make their decisions. This process is shown as an n-player non-cooperative game, following the Nash equilibrium for this game, which is defined as well. The game is accompanied by the systematic interactions between transport and land-use. A mutual adjustment process represents these interactions. The three components are structured by a bi-level mathematical program. The final formulation is interpreted as an oligopolistic Cournot game of which consequence is an approximation of the n-player non-cooperative game. The functional relationship between the decision variables of the upper and the lower levels of the bi-level program produces endogenously-determined transport impedance and locational attractiveness. The endogenous network performance indices of the model are expected to overcome the lack of a realistic network equilibrium description in the existing models. A path-based heuristic algorithm and a simple numerical example are presented. Finally, some concluding remarks are given.

Suggested Citation

  • Chang, Justin Sueun & Mackett, Roger Laurence, 2006. "A bi-level model of the relationship between transport and residential location," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 123-146, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:40:y:2006:i:2:p:123-146
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191-2615(05)00040-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kita, Hideyuki, 1999. "A merging-giveway interaction model of cars in a merging section: a game theoretic analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 33(3-4), pages 305-312, April.
    2. Chattopadhyay, Sudip, 1998. "An Empirical Investigation into the Performance of Ellickson's Random Bidding Model, with an Application to Air Quality Valuation," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 292-314, March.
    3. Bliemer, Michiel C. J. & Bovy, Piet H. L., 2003. "Quasi-variational inequality formulation of the multiclass dynamic traffic assignment problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 501-519, July.
    4. Christer Anderstig & Lars‐Göran Mattsson, 1991. "An Integrated Model Of Residential And Employment Location In A Metropolitan Region," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 70(2), pages 167-184, April.
    5. Oppenheim, Norbert, 1993. "Equilibrium trip distribution/assignment with variable destination costs," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 207-217, June.
    6. Gross, David J., 1988. "Estimating willingness to pay for housing characteristics: An application of the Ellickson bid-rent model," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 95-112, July.
    7. Kim, Tschangho John, 1983. "A combined land use-transportation model when zonal travel demand is endogenously determined," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 17(6), pages 449-462, December.
    8. Blackley, Paul R., 1985. "The demand for industrial sites in a metropolitan area: Theory, empirical evidence, and policy implications," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 247-261, March.
    9. Earnhart, Dietrich, 2002. "Combining Revealed and Stated Data to Examine Housing Decisions Using Discrete Choice Analysis," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 143-169, January.
    10. Bell, Michael G. H., 2000. "A game theory approach to measuring the performance reliability of transport networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 533-545, August.
    11. D E Boyce & F Southworth, 1979. "Quasi-Dynamic Urban-Location Models with Endogenously Determined Travel Costs," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 11(5), pages 575-584, May.
    12. Lee, Kyu Sik, 1982. "A model of intraurban employment location: An application to Bogota, Colombia," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 263-279, November.
    13. Fujita,Masahisa, 1991. "Urban Economic Theory," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521396455.
    14. Rosen, Sherwin, 1974. "Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 82(1), pages 34-55, Jan.-Feb..
    15. Hillel Bar-Gera, 2002. "Origin-Based Algorithm for the Traffic Assignment Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(4), pages 398-417, November.
    16. Yang, Hai & Yan Kong, Hoi & Meng, Qiang, 2001. "Value-of-time distributions and competitive bus services," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 411-424, December.
    17. Anas, Alex, 1983. "Discrete choice theory, information theory and the multinomial logit and gravity models," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 13-23, February.
    18. Bell, Michael G. H. & Cassir, Chris, 2002. "Risk-averse user equilibrium traffic assignment: an application of game theory," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 36(8), pages 671-681, September.
    19. John M. Quigley, 1976. "Housing Demand in the Short Run: An Analysis of Polytomous Choice," NBER Chapters, in: Explorations in Economic Research, Volume 3, number 1, pages 76-102, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    20. Yang, Hai & Bell, Michael G. H., 2001. "Transport bilevel programming problems: recent methodological advances," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 1-4, January.
    21. Smith, M. J., 1979. "The existence, uniqueness and stability of traffic equilibria," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 13(4), pages 295-304, December.
    22. Lundqvist, Lars & Mattsson, Lars-Goran, 1983. "Transportation systems and residential location," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 279-294, March.
    23. Ellickson, Bryan, 1981. "An alternative test of the hedonic theory of housing markets," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(1), pages 56-79, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ng, Ka Fai & Lo, Hong K., 2015. "Optimal housing supply in a bid-rent equilibrium framework," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 62-78.
    2. Li, Tongfei & Sun, Huijun & Wu, Jianjun & Ge, Ying-en, 2017. "Optimal toll of new highway in the equilibrium framework of heterogeneous households' residential location choice," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 123-137.
    3. Vincent Viguié, 2015. "Cross-commuting and housing prices in a polycentric modeling of cities," Policy Papers 2015.03, FAERE - French Association of Environmental and Resource Economists.
    4. Liu, Zhiyuan & Wang, Zewen & Cheng, Qixiu & Yin, Ruyang & Wang, Meng, 2021. "Estimation of urban network capacity with second-best constraints for multimodal transport systems," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 276-294.
    5. Ng, Ka Fai & Lo, Hong K., 2017. "On joint railway and housing development: Housing-led versus railway-led schemes," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 464-488.
    6. Huai, Yue & Lo, Hong K. & Ng, Ka Fai, 2021. "Monocentric versus polycentric urban structure: Case study in Hong Kong," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 99-118.
    7. Michael J. Clay & Arnold Valdez, 2017. "The Bid-rent Land Use Model of the simple, efficient, elegant, and effective model of land use and transportation," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(4), pages 449-464, May.
    8. Mahyar Amirgholy & Hojjat Rezaeestakhruie & Hossain Poorzahedy, 2015. "Multi-objective cordon price design to control long run adverse traffic effects in large urban areas," Netnomics, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 1-52, August.
    9. Peng, Ya-Ting & Li, Zhi-Chun & Choi, Keechoo, 2017. "Transit-oriented development in an urban rail transportation corridor," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 269-290.
    10. Ma, Xiaosu & Lo, Hong K., 2012. "Modeling transport management and land use over time," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(6), pages 687-709.
    11. Justin S. Chang, 2007. "A demonstrative application of the bid-rent network equilibrium model," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(1), pages 27-57, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huai, Yue & Lo, Hong K. & Ng, Ka Fai, 2021. "Monocentric versus polycentric urban structure: Case study in Hong Kong," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 99-118.
    2. Ricardo Hurtubia & Michel Bierlaire, 2014. "Estimation of Bid Functions for Location Choice and Price Modeling with a Latent Variable Approach," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 47-65, March.
    3. Earnhart, Dietrich, 2002. "Combining Revealed and Stated Data to Examine Housing Decisions Using Discrete Choice Analysis," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 143-169, January.
    4. McMillen, Daniel P., 1997. "Multiple Regime Bid-Rent Function Estimation," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 301-319, March.
    5. Palmquist, Raymond B., 2006. "Property Value Models," Handbook of Environmental Economics, in: K. G. Mäler & J. R. Vincent (ed.), Handbook of Environmental Economics, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 16, pages 763-819, Elsevier.
    6. Chattopadhyay, Sudip, 2000. "The effectiveness of McFaddens's nested logit model in valuing amenity improvement," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 23-43, January.
    7. McDonald, John F. & McMillen, Daniel P., 2000. "Employment Subcenters and Subsequent Real Estate Development in Suburban Chicago," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 135-157, July.
    8. F J Martínez, 1992. "The Bid—Choice Land-Use Model: An Integrated Economic Framework," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 24(6), pages 871-885, June.
    9. Brueckner, Jan K., 2013. "Slums in developing countries: New evidence for Indonesia," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 278-290.
    10. Martínez, Francisco J. & Henríquez, Rodrigo, 2007. "A random bidding and supply land use equilibrium model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 632-651, July.
    11. Sudip Chattopadhyay, 2003. "A Repeated Sampling Technique in Assessing the Validity of Benefit Transfer in Valuing Non-Market Goods," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 79(4), pages 576-596.
    12. Vincent Viguié, 2015. "Cross-commuting and housing prices in a polycentric modeling of cities," Working Papers 2015.09, FAERE - French Association of Environmental and Resource Economists.
    13. Paul R. Blackley & David Greytak, 1986. "Comparative Advantage and Industrial Location: An Intrametropolitan Evaluation," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 23(3), pages 221-230, June.
    14. Boyce, David, 2007. "Future research on urban transportation network modeling," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 472-481, July.
    15. Zhi Dong & Tien Sing, 2014. "Developer Heterogeneity and Competitive Land Bidding," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 441-466, April.
    16. Randall Crane & Amrita Daniere & Stacy Harwood, 1997. "The Contribution of Environmental Amenities to Low-income Housing: A Comparative Study of Bangkok and Jakarta," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 34(9), pages 1495-1512, August.
    17. Kyu Sik Lee, 1985. "Decentralization Trends of Employment Location and Spatial Policies in LDC Cities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 22(2), pages 151-162, April.
    18. Tomás Cox & Ricardo Hurtubia, 2021. "Latent Segmentation of Urban Space through Residential Location Choice," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 199-228, March.
    19. Chattopadhyay, Sudip, 1998. "An Empirical Investigation into the Performance of Ellickson's Random Bidding Model, with an Application to Air Quality Valuation," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 292-314, March.
    20. Malpezzi, Stephen, 2001. "The Contributions of Stephen K. Mayo to Housing and Urban Economics," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 10(2), pages 72-108, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:40:y:2006:i:2:p:123-146. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/548/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.