IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/stapro/v65y2003i3p233-239.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing practical significance of the proportional odds assumption

Author

Listed:
  • Kim, Ji-Hyun

Abstract

The proportional odds model is a popular regression model for ordinal categorical responses, which has a rather strong underlying assumption, the proportional odds assumption. The rejection of the null assumption, however, is not very informative since a statistical significance does not necessarily imply a practical significance. This paper proposes a graphical method for assessing the practical significance of the assumption.

Suggested Citation

  • Kim, Ji-Hyun, 2003. "Assessing practical significance of the proportional odds assumption," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 65(3), pages 233-239, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:65:y:2003:i:3:p:233-239
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-7152(03)00259-1
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aguilar, Francisco X. & Daniel, Marissa “Jo” & Cai, Zhen, 2014. "Family-forest Owners’ Willingness to Harvest Sawlogs and Woody Biomass: The Effect of Price on Social Availability," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 0, pages 1-21.
    2. Maria Iannario & Domenico Piccolo, 2016. "A comprehensive framework of regression models for ordinal data," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 74(2), pages 233-252, August.
    3. Peter van der Zwan & Roy Thurik & Isabel Grilo, 2010. "The entrepreneurial ladder and its determinants," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(17), pages 2183-2191.
    4. Anasua Chakraborty & Hichem Omrani & Jacques Teller, 2022. "A Comparative Analysis of Drivers Impacting Urban Densification for Cross Regional Scenarios in Brussels Metropolitan Area," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-20, December.
    5. Arthur Jacobs & Elsy Verhofstadt & Luc Van Ootegem, 2023. "Are more automatable jobs less satisfying?," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 23/1059, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    6. Valerii Baidin & Christopher J. Gerry & Maria Kaneva, 2021. "How Self-Rated is Self-Rated Health? Exploring the Role of Individual and Institutional Factors in Reporting Heterogeneity in Russia," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 155(2), pages 675-696, June.
    7. Woo, C.K. & Zarnikau, J. & Moore, J. & Horowitz, I., 2011. "Wind generation and zonal-market price divergence: Evidence from Texas," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(7), pages 3928-3938, July.
    8. Gerhard Tutz & Moritz Berger, 2022. "Sparser Ordinal Regression Models Based on Parametric and Additive Location‐Shift Approaches," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 90(2), pages 306-327, August.
    9. Kathryn M. Irvine & T. J. Rodhouse & Ilai N. Keren, 2016. "Extending Ordinal Regression with a Latent Zero-Augmented Beta Distribution," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 21(4), pages 619-640, December.
    10. Tutz, G. & Berger, M., 2017. "Separating location and dispersion in ordinal regression models," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 2(C), pages 131-148.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:65:y:2003:i:3:p:233-239. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.