IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/joreco/v15y2008i1p1-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An analysis of suppliers’ roles in category management collaboration

Author

Listed:
  • Lindblom, Arto
  • Olkkonen, Rami

Abstract

Category management (CM) seems to bring many positive elements to supplier–retailer interaction, e.g., continuous collaboration instead of repeated competitive biddings and knowledge sharing instead of knowledge withholding. However, its nature cannot be understood without understanding the roles of the collaborating suppliers. Hence, the purpose of this article is to address the following research questions: (i) in the Finnish context, how suppliers perceive their role (i.e., their ability to provide input on CM tactics) related to their competitors in CM collaboration; and (ii) whether the effects of CM are perceived differently in groups of suppliers. The sample consisted of 89 representatives of fast-moving consumer-goods categories in the Finnish grocery industry. The study revealed that the large suppliers had a relatively strong role in CM collaboration, while the small suppliers had a weak role in CM decision-making and were easily excluded. ANOVAs indicated that suppliers with stronger or equal roles compared with their competitors were also more capable of influencing the most CM tactics. Furthermore, the effects of CM were perceived more positively among suppliers who were more capable of providing tactical input than among those with a weak collaborative role. This article offers new information about the different roles of suppliers in CM collaboration. However, more theoretical as well as quantitative and qualitative empirical studies are needed in order to increase knowledge about the nature and consequences of this topical management practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Lindblom, Arto & Olkkonen, Rami, 2008. "An analysis of suppliers’ roles in category management collaboration," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 1-8.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:joreco:v:15:y:2008:i:1:p:1-8
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2007.01.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969698907000033
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jretconser.2007.01.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Campbell, N. C. G., 1985. "An interaction approach to organizational buying behavior," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 35-48, February.
    2. Darren Hudson & Lee-Hong Seah & Diane Hite & Tim Haab, 2004. "Telephone presurveys, self-selection, and non-response bias to mail and Internet surveys in economic research," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(4), pages 237-240.
    3. Dussart, Christian, 1998. "Category management:: Strengths, limits and developments," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 50-62, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ranga Chimhundu, 2016. "Marketing store brands and manufacturer brands: Role of referent and expert power in merchandising decisions," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(5), pages 24-40, September.
    2. Viswanathan, Madhu & Narasimhan, Om & John, George, 2020. "Economic impact of category captaincy: an examination of assortments and prices," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 107034, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Kim, Changju & Takashima, Katsuyoshi, 2014. "The impact of outcome-based control for retail buyers on organizational performance," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 76-83.
    4. Madhu Viswanathan & Om Narasimhan & George John, 2021. "Economic Impact of Category Captaincy: An Examination of Assortments and Prices," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(2), pages 261-282, March.
    5. Vincent R. Nijs & Kanishka Misra & Karsten Hansen, 2014. "Outsourcing Retail Pricing to a Category Captain: The Role of Information Firewalls," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 66-81, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lindhjem, Henrik & Navrud, Ståle, 2011. "Using Internet in Stated Preference Surveys: A Review and Comparison of Survey Modes," International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, now publishers, vol. 5(4), pages 309-351, September.
    2. Darren Hudson & Karina Gallardo & Terry Hanson, 2005. "Hypothetical (Non)Bias In Choice Experiments: Evidence From Freshwater Prawns," Experimental 0503003, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Lindhjem, Henrik & Navrud, Ståle, 2008. "Internet CV surveys – a cheap, fast way to get large samples of biased values?," MPRA Paper 11471, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Karolina M. Ilyenkova, 2022. "Category Management or Category Captainship in the Consumer Value Chain?," Economics of Contemporary Russia, Regional Public Organization for Assistance to the Development of Institutions of the Department of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, issue 2.
    5. Glynn T. Tonsor & Ted C. Schroeder & Joost M. E. Pennings, 2009. "Factors Impacting Food Safety Risk Perceptions," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(3), pages 625-644, September.
    6. Hoffmann, Antje & Herstatt, Cornelius, 2005. "Service provider - customer interactions: Key to success of innovative services," Working Papers 30, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute for Technology and Innovation Management.
    7. Makkonen, Hannu & Olkkonen, Rami & Halinen, Aino, 2012. "Organizational buying as muddling through: A practice–theory approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(6), pages 773-780.
    8. Fullerton, Thomas M., Jr. & Molina, Angel L., Jr. & Pisani, Michael J., 2009. "Peso Acceptance Patterns in El Paso," MPRA Paper 17900, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 19 Jun 2009.
    9. Marescotti, Maria Elena & Caputo, Vincenzina & Demartini, Eugenio & Gaviglio, Anna, 2020. "Consumer preferences for wild game cured meat label: do attitudes towards animal welfare matter?," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 23(4), June.
    10. Lindhjem, Henrik & Navrud, Ståle, 2010. "Can cheap panel-based internet surveys substitute costly in-person interviews in CV surveys?," MPRA Paper 24069, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Søren Olsen, 2009. "Choosing Between Internet and Mail Survey Modes for Choice Experiment Surveys Considering Non-Market Goods," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 44(4), pages 591-610, December.
    12. Piecyk, Maja I. & McKinnon, Alan C., 2010. "Forecasting the carbon footprint of road freight transport in 2020," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(1), pages 31-42, November.
    13. Fiore, M. & Gaviglio, A. & Demartini, E. & La Sala, P., 2018. "Sugarcoating Food Technologies and consumers’ acceptance of long-life fish," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 275971, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    14. Joseph Seong & Simone Valle de Souza & H. Christopher Peterson, 2023. "Seeds of Industry Sustainability: Consumer Attitudes towards Indoor Agriculture Benefits versus Its Advanced Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, January.
    15. Ojansivu, Ilkka & Laari-Salmela, Sari & Hermes, Jan, 2022. "The social impact of the Nokia-Elcoteq business relationship: Examining the consequences of legitimating relationship norms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 193-206.
    16. Tonsor, Glynn T., 2010. "Consumer Food Safety Perceptions: Do they Differ across Products, Species, and Specific Risks?," 2010 Annual Meeting, July 25-27, 2010, Denver, Colorado 61044, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    17. Sriram, Ven & Stump, Rodney, 2004. "Information technology investments in purchasing: an empirical investigation of communications, relationship and performance outcomes," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 41-55, February.
    18. Claycomb, Cindy & Frankwick, Gary L., 2005. "The dynamics of buyers' perceived costs during a relationship development process: an empirical assessment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(12), pages 1662-1671, December.
    19. Alper Nakkas & Yasin Alan & Mümin Kurtuluş, 2020. "Category Captainship in the Presence of Retail Competition," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(2), pages 263-280, February.
    20. Santos, Jose Novais & Baptista, Cristina Sales, 2016. "Information exchange within horizontal relationships: A fuzzy-set approach to companies' characteristics role," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 5255-5260.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:joreco:v:15:y:2008:i:1:p:1-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-retailing-and-consumer-services .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.