IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v178y2024ics0148296324001851.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of self-construal on consumers’ intention to write reviews: A trait activation perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, Chunfeng
  • Lü, Kevin
  • Zhang, Depeng

Abstract

Identifying which consumers are more likely to write reviews and when they are more likely to do so is of paramount importance for marketing management. Applying trait activation theory, this research explores how brand strength and consumption experience affect the intention of consumers with varying self-construals to write reviews. The findings suggest that, in general, consumers with an independent self-construal are less inclined to write reviews compared to those with an interdependent self-construal generally. However, for weak brands, consumers with an interdependent self-construal are less inclined to write reviews compared to those with an independent self-construal, irrespective of whether they have a positive or negative experience. When dealing with strong brands, consumers with an independent self-construal are more likely to generate reviews following a negative experience rather than a positive one. These findings improve our understanding of consumers’ review-writing behavior and offer insights for practitioners to enhance consumer review management.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, Chunfeng & Lü, Kevin & Zhang, Depeng, 2024. "The impact of self-construal on consumers’ intention to write reviews: A trait activation perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:178:y:2024:i:c:s0148296324001851
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114681
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296324001851
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114681?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:178:y:2024:i:c:s0148296324001851. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.