IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/iburev/v33y2024i3s096959312200110x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

More policy is not always effective policy: How policy coherence affects firm internationalization

Author

Listed:
  • Utesch-Xiong, Fredrik
  • Leymann, Gunnar
  • Lundan, Sarianna M.

Abstract

This paper aims to contribute to our understanding of the effects of home country policy change on the internationalization of EMNEs. Our analysis is based on a unique data set of Chinese outward FDI policies in 1979–2019 that enables us to examine policy coherence in three dimensions: signal ambiguity, instrument expansion, and scope expansion. By analyzing Chinese POEs between 2012 and 2018, we find that more ambiguous policy signals reduce the likelihood of cross-border M&As. Furthermore, we find that the expansion of policy instruments and policy scope also negatively affect internationalization. These effects become weaker over time, and a smaller sample of SOEs shows no susceptibility to instrument and scope expansion. We conclude that while the content of policy is essential, the coherence of the policy process can have an impact that may overwhelm the positive effects of policies if the firms lack policy awareness, or the implementation exceeds their short-term capacity to adjust. Thus, more policy is not always more effective policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Utesch-Xiong, Fredrik & Leymann, Gunnar & Lundan, Sarianna M., 2024. "More policy is not always effective policy: How policy coherence affects firm internationalization," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(3).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:iburev:v:33:y:2024:i:3:s096959312200110x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2022.102082
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096959312200110X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2022.102082?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:iburev:v:33:y:2024:i:3:s096959312200110x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/133/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.