IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/hepoli/v143y2024ics0168851024000538.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Responsiveness of inpatient care and provision of dignity: Insights from a patient experience survey in Israel

Author

Listed:
  • Semyonov-Tal, Keren

Abstract

The paper contributes to the literature on the responsiveness of care, patient dignity, and disparities in the provision of health services. It does so by evaluating indicators of patient responsiveness while focusing on aspects of dignified treatment. The data were taken from the Patient Experience Survey of General Public Hospitals conducted by the Israel Ministry of Health in 2018. The analysis focuses on two indicators of responsiveness (i.e., actual) and three indicators of patient satisfaction with responsiveness (i.e., satisfaction). The analysis reveals that variations of these indicators are associated with patients' sociodemographic attributes and the hospitals' characteristics. However, while the likelihood of the actual provision of responsive care tends to be lower for vulnerable patients, the satisfaction of vulnerable populations with responsiveness tends to be higher. The data also reveal that the likelihood of responsive treatment and patient satisfaction with this tends to be lower for patients hospitalized in smaller hospitals and hospitals located in the periphery. The findings and their meaning are discussed in the context of studies on responsiveness of care, health disparities, dignified treatment, and patient satisfaction with the provision of health services.

Suggested Citation

  • Semyonov-Tal, Keren, 2024. "Responsiveness of inpatient care and provision of dignity: Insights from a patient experience survey in Israel," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:143:y:2024:i:c:s0168851024000538
    DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105043
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851024000538
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105043?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:143:y:2024:i:c:s0168851024000538. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/healthpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.