IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/bracre/v53y2021i6s0890838919300988.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance management in a milieu of customer participatory measurement: Beyond the ratings and rankings of Strictly Come Dancing

Author

Listed:
  • Nørreklit, Hanne
  • Trenca, Mihaela

Abstract

This research concerns the performance management practices that unfolded in Strictly Come Dancing, a television show whose viewers were promised that they could be its co-creators through Web 2.0-based customer participatory measurement systems that directed the development of the series mechanically. Analysing the performance management practice of the 2013 Danish version of the show, we find that an emotive, antagonistic competitive language game and an authoritative, calculative language game were operating in interaction. They facilitated an expectation of consumer democracy and made viewers engage fiercely with the show, while simultaneously controlling the drama so that it would unfold in a way that matched the voice of the television company. The study provides novel insights into our understanding of how companies might produce and use customer participatory measurement systems as an integrated part of their customer participatory logic of value co-creation. It also adds to the methodological apparatus for analysing, conceptualising, and understanding organisational practices of performance management.

Suggested Citation

  • Nørreklit, Hanne & Trenca, Mihaela, 2021. "Performance management in a milieu of customer participatory measurement: Beyond the ratings and rankings of Strictly Come Dancing," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 53(6).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:bracre:v:53:y:2021:i:6:s0890838919300988
    DOI: 10.1016/j.bar.2019.100873
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890838919300988
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.bar.2019.100873?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hanne Nørreklit & Lennart Nørreklit & Falconer Mitchell, 2016. "Understanding practice generalisation – opening the research/practice gap," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 13(3), pages 278-302, August.
    2. Gebauer, Johannes & Füller, Johann & Pezzei, Roland, 2013. "The dark and the bright side of co-creation: Triggers of member behavior in online innovation communities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(9), pages 1516-1527.
    3. Mangold, W. Glynn & Faulds, David J., 2009. "Social media: The new hybrid element of the promotion mix," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 52(4), pages 357-365, July.
    4. Lennart Nørreklit & Lisa Jack & Hanne Nørreklit, 2019. "Moving towards digital governance of university scholars: instigating a post-truth university culture," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 23(4), pages 869-899, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ryu, Sann & Park, JungKun, 2020. "The effects of benefit-driven commitment on usage of social media for shopping and positive word-of-mouth," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    2. Mahan, Joseph E. & Seo, Won Jae & Jordan, Jeremy S. & Funk, Daniel, 2015. "Exploring the impact of social networking sites on running involvement, running behavior, and social life satisfaction," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 182-192.
    3. Kazadi, Kande & Lievens, Annouk & Mahr, Dominik, 2016. "Stakeholder co-creation during the innovation process: Identifying capabilities for knowledge creation among multiple stakeholders," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 525-540.
    4. Salgado, Stéphane & Hemonnet-Goujot, Aurelie & Henard, David H. & de Barnier, Virginie, 2020. "The dynamics of innovation contest experience: An integrated framework from the customer’s perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 29-43.
    5. Xing Wan & Javier Cenamor & Jing Chen, 2017. "Exploring Performance Determinants of China’s Cable Operators and OTT Service Providers in the Era of Digital Convergence—From the Perspective of an Industry Platform," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-19, December.
    6. Kaur, Puneet & Dhir, Amandeep & Bodhi, Rahul & Singh, Tripti & Almotairi, Mohammad, 2020. "Why do people use and recommend m-wallets?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    7. Polat Can & Ilker Çetin, 2017. "A Research on the Comparison of the Effect of Benefits Obtained from Social Media Marketing to Brand Commitment in Terms of Domestic and Foreign Consumers," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(2), pages 29-42, February.
    8. Sindy Liu & Patsy Perry & Gregory Gadzinski, 2019. "The implications of digital marketing on WeChat for luxury fashion brands in China," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(4), pages 395-409, July.
    9. Shi, Lei & Miles, Angela, 2020. "Non-effectual, non-customer effectual, or customer-effectual: A conceptual exploration of the applicability of the effectuation logic in startup brand identity construction," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 168-179.
    10. Lagin, Madelen & Gebert-Persson, Sabine, 2015. "Defining the links between retail price strategies and price tactics," HUI Working Papers 110, HUI Research.
    11. Yandong Wang & Teng Wang & Xinyue Ye & Jianqi Zhu & Jay Lee, 2015. "Using Social Media for Emergency Response and Urban Sustainability: A Case Study of the 2012 Beijing Rainstorm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-17, December.
    12. Morana Fudurić & Andreina Mandelli, 2017. "Corporate and Non-Profit Social Media Policies: A Content Analysis," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 29(1), pages 7-22.
    13. Cambier, Fanny & Poncin, Ingrid, 2020. "Inferring brand integrity from marketing communications: The effects of brand transparency signals in a consumer empowerment context," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 260-270.
    14. Đurđana Ozretić Došen, 2017. "Editorial preface," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 29(1), pages 5-6.
    15. Juan Gabriel Martínez-Navalón & Vera Gelashvili & José Ramón Saura, 2020. "The Impact of Environmental Social Media Publications on User Satisfaction with and Trust in Tourism Businesses," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-17, July.
    16. Sven Tischer, 2012. "Measuring the impact of critical incidents on brand personality," SFB 649 Discussion Papers SFB649DP2012-064, Sonderforschungsbereich 649, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany.
    17. Ivanete Schneider Hahn & Flavia Luciane Scherer & Kenny Basso & Marindia Brachak dos Santos, 2016. "Consumer Trust in and Emotional Response to Advertisements on Social Media and their Influence on Brand Evaluation," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 13(4), pages 49-71, July.
    18. Bosio, Birgit & Haselwanter, Stefanie & Ceipek, Michael, 2018. "The Utilization of Social Media Marketing in Destination Management Organizations," 6th International OFEL Conference on Governance, Management and Entrepreneurship. New Business Models and Institutional Entrepreneurs: Leading Disruptive Change (Dubrovnik, 2018), in: 6th International OFEL Conference on Governance, Management and Entrepreneurship. New Business Models and Institutional Entrepreneurs: Leading Disrupt, pages 249-268, Governance Research and Development Centre (CIRU), Zagreb.
    19. Dilaver Tengilimoglu & Nilgün Sarp & Cemre Eda Yar & Meral Bektaş & Mehmet Nil Hidir & Esin Korkmaz, 2017. "The consumers' social media use in choosing physicians and hospitals: the case study of the province of Izmir," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 19-35, January.
    20. Aldo Pavan & Isabella Fadda, 2017. "Increasing the value of accounting research: An Italian perspective," FINANCIAL REPORTING, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2017(2), pages 29-42.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:bracre:v:53:y:2021:i:6:s0890838919300988. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/the-british-accounting-review .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.