IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ecr/col070/47203.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Production fragmentation, foreign trade and structural complexity: a comparative analysis of Brazil and Mexico

Author

Listed:
  • Castilho, Marta Reis
  • Da Costa, Kaio Glauber Vital
  • Puchet Anyul, Martín

Abstract

Starting in the 1980s, Brazil and Mexico adopted diverging trade and production strategies, which had significant effects on their respective production and trade structures. This study investigates how the two countries’ different patterns of trade specialization affected the complexity of their respective production structures between 1995 and 2011. Although the foreign trade profiles of Brazil and Mexico differ mainly in their export structures, the processes of trade liberalization and integration into global value chains made the network of interrelationships between the different sectors less complex. Since these are Latin America’s two largest economies, a reduction in the complexity of their production structures not only has repercussions on the dynamics of their respective national economies, but also affects those of other countries in the region.

Suggested Citation

  • Castilho, Marta Reis & Da Costa, Kaio Glauber Vital & Puchet Anyul, Martín, 2021. "Production fragmentation, foreign trade and structural complexity: a comparative analysis of Brazil and Mexico," Revista CEPAL, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), April.
    • Handle: RePEc:ecr:col070:47203
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://repositorio.cepal.org/handle/11362/47203
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roland Lantner & Frederic Carluer, 2004. "Spatial dominance: a new approach to the estimation of interconnectedness in regional input-output tables," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 38(3), pages 451-467, September.
    2. Juan Eduardo Santarcángelo (ed.), 2019. "The Manufacturing Sector in Argentina, Brazil, and Mexico," Palgrave Studies in Latin American Heterodox Economics, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-3-030-04705-4, February.
    3. Michael Sonis & Geoffrey J. D. Hewings, 1998. "original: Economic complexity as network complication: Multiregional input-output structural path analysis," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 32(3), pages 407-436.
    4. Roland Lantner & Didier Lebert, 2015. "Dominance et amplification des influences dans les structures linéaires," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-01225748, HAL.
    5. -, 2021. "CEPAL Review no. 133," Revista CEPAL, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), April.
    6. Prema-chandra Athukorala & Jayant Menon, 2010. "Global Production Sharing, Trade Patterns and Determinants of Trade Flows," Departmental Working Papers 2010-06, The Australian National University, Arndt-Corden Department of Economics.
    7. Richard Baldwin, 2011. "Trade And Industrialisation After Globalisation's 2nd Unbundling: How Building And Joining A Supply Chain Are Different And Why It Matters," NBER Working Papers 17716, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Moreno-Brid, Juan Carlos & Ros, Jaime, 2009. "Development and Growth in the Mexican Economy: An Historical Perspective," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780195371161, Decembrie.
    9. Roland Lantner & Didier Lebert, 2015. "Dominance et amplification des influences dans les structures linéaires," Post-Print halshs-01225748, HAL.
    10. Dong Guo & Geoffrey Hewings & Michael Sonis, 2005. "Integrating decomposition approaches for the analysis of temporal changes in economic structure: an application to Chicago's economy from 1980 to 2000," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(3), pages 297-315.
    11. Dietzenbacher, Erik, 1992. "The measurement of interindustry linkages : Key sectors in the Netherlands," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 9(4), pages 419-437, October.
    12. Dominik Boddin, 2016. "The Role of Newly Industrialized Economies in Global Value Chains," IMF Working Papers 2016/207, International Monetary Fund.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Carlos Bianchi & Fernando Isabella & Anaclara Martinis & Santiago Picasso, 2023. "Varieties of middle-income trap: heterogeneous trajectories and common determinants," Documentos de Trabajo (working papers) 23-16, Instituto de Economía - IECON.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liis LILL, 2008. "Assessing Economic Complexity in some OECD countries with Input-Output Based Measures," EcoMod2008 23800082, EcoMod.
    2. Mafini Dosso & Didier Lebert, 2019. "A geography of corporate knowledge flows across world regions: evidence from patent citations of top R&D-investing firms," JRC Working Papers on Corporate R&D and Innovation 2019-03, Joint Research Centre.
    3. Naudé, Wim & Szirmai, Adam, 2012. "The importance of manufacturing in economic development: Past, present and future perspectives," MERIT Working Papers 2012-041, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    4. João C. Lopes & João Dias & João F. Amaral, 2012. "Assessing economic complexity as interindustry connectedness in nine OECD countries," International Review of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(6), pages 811-827, January.
    5. Roland Lantner & Didier Lebert, 2013. "Dominance, dependence and interdependence in linear structures. A theoretical model and an application to the international trade flows," Post-Print halshs-00825477, HAL.
    6. Naudé, Wim & Szirmai, Adam & Lavopa, Alejandro, 2013. "Industrialization Lessons from BRICS: A Comparative Analysis," IZA Discussion Papers 7543, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    7. Roland Lantner & Didier Lebert, 2013. "Dominance, dependence and interdependence in linear structures. A theoretical model and an application to the international trade flows," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00825477, HAL.
    8. Nizar Riane & Claire David, 2023. "Input-Output Analysis: New Results From Markov Chain Theory," Papers 2301.08136, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2023.
    9. João Ferreira do Amaral & João Dias & João Carlos Lopes, 2007. "Complexity as Interdependence in Input–Output Systems," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 39(7), pages 1770-1782, July.
    10. Roland Lantner & Didier Lebert, 2013. "Dominance, dependence and interdependence in linear structures. A theoretical model and an application to the international trade flows," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 13043, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    11. Fredy Cepeda-Lopez & Fredy Gamboa-Estrada & Carlos Leon-Rincón & Hernán Rincon-Castro, 2022. "Colombian Liberalization and Integration into World Trade Markets: Much Ado about Nothing," Revista de Economía del Rosario, Universidad del Rosario, vol. 25(2), pages 1-44, December.
    12. Blyde, Juan & Molina, Danielken, 2015. "Logistic infrastructure and the international location of fragmented production," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(2), pages 319-332.
    13. Rueda Maurer, Maria, 2017. "Supply chain trade and technological transfer in the ASEAN+3 region," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 277-289.
    14. Sokolova, Maria V., 2016. "Exchange Rates, International Trade and Growth: Re-Evaluation of Undervaluation," Conference papers 332790, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    15. Zacharias Bragoudakis & Evangelia Kasimati & Christos Pierros & Nikolaos Rodousakis & George Soklis, 2022. "Measuring Productivities for the 38 OECD Member Countries: An Input-Output Modelling Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(13), pages 1-21, July.
    16. Ligang Song & Yixiao Zhou, 2020. "The COVID‐19 Pandemic and Its Impact on the Global Economy: What Does It Take to Turn Crisis into Opportunity?," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 28(4), pages 1-25, July.
    17. Davide Consoli & Francesco Vona & Francesco Rentocchini, 2016. "That was then, this is now: skills and routinization in the 2000s," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 25(5), pages 847-866.
    18. Jean-Christophe Bureau & Sébastien Jean, 2013. "Trade liberalization in the bio-economy: coping with a new landscape," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 44(s1), pages 173-182, November.
    19. David Escamilla-Guerrero & Edward Kosack & Zachary Ward, 2023. "The Impact of Violence during the Mexican Revolution on Migration to the United States," NBER Working Papers 31531, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    20. Juan E. Santarcángelo & Juan Manuel Padín, 2021. "Reshaping the Economic Structure in Argentina: The Role of External Debt during the Macri Administration (2015–2019)," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 53(2), pages 237-249, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecr:col070:47203. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Biblioteca CEPAL (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eclaccl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.