IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/col/000520/018563.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Responsabilidad social empresarial como determinante de la intención de compra del consumidor: un análisis mediante modelamiento con ecuaciones estructurales

Author

Listed:
  • Enciso Alfaro, Saudi Yulieth

    (Universidad Militar Nueva Granada)

  • Ruiz Acosta, Liliana Elizabeth Ruiz

    (Universidad Militar Nueva Granada)

  • Mayorga, David Andrés Camargo

    (Universidad Militar Nueva Granada)

Abstract

Los consumidores están cambiando sus preferencias y prioridades de compra en atención a la implementación de prácticas de Responsabilidad Social Empresarial (RSE) vistas desde las dimensiones social, ambiental y económica, buscando minimizar el impacto negativo que las organizaciones pueden generar en su entorno. De ahí que, el objetivo de este artículo sea analizar la relación existente entre las tres dimensiones de la RSE y su influencia en la intención de compra de los consumidores. Para tal fin, se realizaron 107 encuestas en línea auto-administradas, de las cuales se obtuvieron 20 variables observables, 3 variables latentes endógenas y 1 exógena. La modelación se hizo con ecuaciones estructurales (SEM por sus siglas en inglés). Los hallazgos sugieren que las actividades de RSE que hace una organización y que están relacionadas con asuntos sociales, ambientales y económicos se asocian positivamente con la intención de compra, sin embargo, se encontró la relación con la dimensión económica no es tan fuerte como con las dos primeras.

Suggested Citation

  • Enciso Alfaro, Saudi Yulieth & Ruiz Acosta, Liliana Elizabeth Ruiz & Mayorga, David Andrés Camargo, 2020. "Responsabilidad social empresarial como determinante de la intención de compra del consumidor: un análisis mediante modelamiento con ecuaciones estructurales," Revista Tendencias, Universidad de Narino, vol. 21(2), pages 1-18, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:col:000520:018563
    DOI: 10.22267/rtend.202102.138
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.22267/rtend.202102.138
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22267/rtend.202102.138?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. José Rigoberto Parada Daza, 2009. "A valuation model for corporate social responsibility," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 5(3), pages 284-299, July.
    2. Fu-Chiang Yang, 2017. "Integrating corporate social responsibility and profitability into best practice selection: the case of large Taiwanese firms," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(4), pages 1493-1512, July.
    3. Alejandro Alvarado-Herrera & Enrique Bigne & Joaquín Aldas-Manzano & Rafael Curras-Perez, 2017. "A Scale for Measuring Consumer Perceptions of Corporate Social Responsibility Following the Sustainable Development Paradigm," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 140(2), pages 243-262, January.
    4. Sharon McLennan & Glenn Banks, 2019. "Reversing the lens: Why corporate social responsibility is not community development," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(1), pages 117-126, January.
    5. Juan Antonio Plasencia Soler & Fernando Marrero Delgado & Anna María Bajo Sanjuán & Miriam Nicado García, 2018. "Modelos para evaluar la sostenibilidad de las organizaciones," Estudios Gerenciales, Universidad Icesi, vol. 34(146), pages 63-73, February.
    6. Hua Chen & Yusheng Kong, 2009. "Chinese consumer perceptions of socially responsible consumption," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 5(2), pages 144-151, June.
    7. Joo, Soyoung & Miller, Elizabeth G. & Fink, Janet S., 2019. "Consumer evaluations of CSR authenticity: Development and validation of a multidimensional CSR authenticity scale," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 236-249.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stephen T. Homer, 2022. "Perceived corporate citizenship: a scale development and validation study adopting a bottom-up approach," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 1435-1461, June.
    2. Gwarlann Kerviler & Nico Heuvinck & Elodie Gentina, 2022. "“Make an Effort and Show Me the Love!” Effects of Indexical and Iconic Authenticity on Perceived Brand Ethicality," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(1), pages 89-110, August.
    3. Rui Ma & Jacob Cherian & Wen-Hsien Tsai & Muhammad Safdar Sial & Li Hou & Susana Álvarez-Otero, 2021. "The Relationship of Corporate Social Responsibility on Digital Platforms, Electronic Word-of-Mouth, and Consumer-Company Identification: An Application of Social Identity Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-17, April.
    4. Qiulian Shen & Yuxuan Du & Jingxian Huang, 2024. "Consumer Citizenship Behavior in Online/Offline Shopping Contexts: Differential Impact of Consumer Perceived Value and Perceived Corporate Social Responsibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-19, April.
    5. Yusheng Kong & Alex Antwi‐Adjei & Jonas Bawuah, 2020. "A systematic review of the business case for corporate social responsibility and firm performance," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 444-454, March.
    6. Endah Djuwendah & Tuti Karyani & Eliana Wulandari & Pradono Pradono, 2023. "Community-Based Agro-Ecotourism Sustainability in West Java, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-18, July.
    7. Leslier Valenzuela-Fernández & Manuel Escobar-Farfán, 2022. "Zero-Waste Management and Sustainable Consumption: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Mapping Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-24, December.
    8. Chih-Cheng Chen & Asif Khan & Tanaporn Hongsuchon & Athapol Ruangkanjanases & Yen-Tzu Chen & Ornlatcha Sivarak & Shih-Chih Chen, 2021. "The Role of Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Image in Times of Crisis: The Mediating Role of Customer Trust," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-20, August.
    9. Appel Mahmud & Donghong Ding & Md. Morshadul Hasan, 2021. "Corporate Social Responsibility: Business Responses to Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440209, January.
    10. Nicolas G. A. Lorgnier & Che-Jen Su & Shawn M. O’Rourke, 2022. "Brands’ perceived sustainable development goals: index development and applications with professional sport teams and fast-food brands," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 16(1), pages 125-157, March.
    11. Claudiu George Bocean & Michael Marian Nicolescu & Marian Cazacu & Simona Dumitriu, 2022. "The Role of Social Responsibility and Ethics in Employees’ Wellbeing," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-15, July.
    12. Brij B. Gupta & Akshat Gaurav & Prabin Kumar Panigrahi, 2023. "Analysis of the development of sustainable entrepreneurship practices through knowledge and smart innovative based education system," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 923-940, June.
    13. Mustafa Ozkan & Kemal Cek & Serife Z. Eyupoglu, 2022. "Sustainable Development and Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty in North Cyprus: The Mediating Effect of Customer Identification," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-13, April.
    14. Camila Kolling & José Luis Duarte Ribeiro & Donato Morea & Gianpaolo Iazzolino, 2023. "Corporate social responsibility and circular economy from the perspective of consumers: A cross‐cultural analysis in the cosmetic industry," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3), pages 1226-1243, May.
    15. Virginia S. Harrison & Michail Vafeiadis & Joseph Bober, 2022. "Greening Professional Sport: How Communicating the Fit, Proximity, and Impact of Sustainability Efforts Affects Fan Perceptions and Supportive Intentions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-21, March.
    16. Chen Wang & Yeonggil Kim & Changhee Kim, 2022. "Are all CSR Activities in Your SNS Authentic? The Antecedents and Outcomes of Consumer Perceived Authenticity of CSR," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, November.
    17. Jinhua Li & Yongyi Chen & Qiankai Qing, 2021. "Differentiated consumer responses to corporate social responsibility domains moderated by corporate social responsibility perceptions: A Kano model‐based perspective," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(6), pages 1606-1619, November.
    18. Duygu Turker & Ozge Can & Gizem Aras‐Beger, 2023. "How authenticity of corporate social responsibility affects organizational attractiveness: Stakeholder perceptions of organizational ideology," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(4), pages 1680-1697, July.
    19. Patrick Klein & Bastian Popp, 2022. "Last-Mile Delivery Methods in E-Commerce: Does Perceived Sustainability Matter for Consumer Acceptance and Usage?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-27, December.
    20. Lim, Xin-Jean & Cheah, Jun-Hwa & Ngo, Liem Viet & Chan, Kara & Ting, Hiram, 2023. "How do crazy rich Asians perceive sustainable luxury? Investigating the determinants of consumers’ willingness to pay a premium price," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    intención de compra; consumidor; sostenibilidad; responsabilidad social empresarial; modelos multivariados;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C39 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Other
    • C51 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Model Construction and Estimation
    • D12 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis
    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility
    • Q56 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environment and Development; Environment and Trade; Sustainability; Environmental Accounts and Accounting; Environmental Equity; Population Growth

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:col:000520:018563. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Universidad de Narino (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fenarco.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.