IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/meanco/v10y2022i1p317-328.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring Teenagers’ Folk Theories and Coping Strategies Regarding Commercial Data Collection and Personalized Advertising

Author

Listed:
  • Sanne Holvoet

    (Department of Communication Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium)

  • Steffi De Jans

    (Department of Communication Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium)

  • Ralf De Wolf

    (Department of Communication Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium / imec-mict-UGent, Ghent University, Belgium)

  • Liselot Hudders

    (Department of Communication Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium)

  • Laura Herrewijn

    (Department of Management and Communication, AP University of Applied Sciences and Arts Antwerp, Belgium)

Abstract

New data collection methods and processing capabilities facilitate online personalization of advertisements but also challenge youth’s understanding of how these methods work. Teenagers are often unaware of the commercial use of their personal information and are susceptible to the persuasive effects of personalized advertising. This raises questions about their ability to engage in privacy-protecting behaviors. This article examines teenagers’ coping responses to commercial data collection and subsequent personalized advertising, considering their limited knowledge. Ten focus groups with 35 teenagers aged 12–14 were conducted. The findings show that teenagers hold certain folk theories (i.e., incomplete and/or inaccurate representations of reality) about how and why their personal information is being collected for commercial purposes (e.g., commercial data collection is unavoidable or all principles of privacy statements are the same). Their coping responses regarding commercial data collection (e.g., limiting information disclosure or refusing to accept privacy policies) and personalized advertising (e.g., trying to change settings or avoiding interaction) are often based on these folk theories and embedded in their everyday practices. Despite teenagers’ efforts, we argue that their responses might not always be effective. Implications for educators, advertisers, and policymakers are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Sanne Holvoet & Steffi De Jans & Ralf De Wolf & Liselot Hudders & Laura Herrewijn, 2022. "Exploring Teenagers’ Folk Theories and Coping Strategies Regarding Commercial Data Collection and Personalized Advertising," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(1), pages 317-328.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v:10:y:2022:i:1:p:317-328
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/4704
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Laurien Desimpelaere & Liselot Hudders & Dieneke Van de Sompel, 2020. "Children’s and Parents’ Perceptions of Online Commercial Data Practices: A Qualitative Study," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 163-174.
    2. Mariya Stoilova & Sonia Livingstone & Rishita Nandagiri, 2020. "Digital by Default: Children’s Capacity to Understand and Manage Online Data and Privacy," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 197-207.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Claudia Riesmeyer & Arne Freya Zillich & Thorsten Naab, 2022. "Editorial: Digital Child- and Adulthood—Risks, Opportunities, and Challenges," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(1), pages 301-304.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Milkaite, Ingrida & De Wolf, Ralf & Lievens, Eva & Leyn, Tom De & Martens, Marijn, 2021. "Children’s reflections on privacy and the protection of their personal data: A child-centric approach to data protection information formats," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    2. Ralf De Wolf & Mariek M. P. Vanden Abeele, 2020. "Editorial: Children’s Voices on Privacy Management and Data Responsibilization," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 158-162.
    3. Sue Nichols & Nadia Selim, 2022. "Digitally Mediated Parenting: A Review of the Literature," Societies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, March.
    4. Hooper, Louise & Livingstone, Sonia & Pothong, Kruakae, 2022. "Problems with data governance in UK schools: the cases of Google Classroom and ClassDojo," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 119736, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v:10:y:2022:i:1:p:317-328. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.