IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/eucflr/v15y2018i3p615-644n8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Path Dependence and Paradox in Harmonizing Out-of-court Procedures across Europe. The Evidence from Italy

Author

Listed:
  • Mangano Renato

    (Renato Mangano is a Professor of Commercial Law at the University of Palermo (Italy). This paper reproduces with many changes the text of a lecture given in Cologne on 26th of August 2016 at the “7th International Summer Symposium – Out of Court Restructuring Proceedings in Europe”. The author is grateful to an undergraduate student attending his course, Miss Silvia Rotolo, who updated data concerning Italian out-of-court procedures. Of course, all errors and material omissions remain the author’s responsibility. The author also wishes to thank both Prof Christoph Teichmann and Prof Jennifer Payne who, in their respective roles, have decided to publish this paper in this special issue devoted to the UK schemes of arrangement.University of Palermo PalermoItaly)

Abstract

This paper focuses on the impact that the ‘new approach to business failure’ has had on Italian out-of-court procedures. It will demonstrate that in 2005 Italian law started to embrace the rescue culture of out-of-court procedures by means of a series of reforms; initially, this movement facilitated the incorporation of the ‘new approach to business failure’, but – and this is the paradox – the more law makers and courts remove the old paradigms and introduce new ones, which in principle could make the procedures smoother, cheaper and more efficient, the more the law in the book and the law in action appear to be overloaded with additional prerequisites which make the procedures cumbersome, costly and inefficient.

Suggested Citation

  • Mangano Renato, 2018. "Path Dependence and Paradox in Harmonizing Out-of-court Procedures across Europe. The Evidence from Italy," European Company and Financial Law Review, De Gruyter, vol. 15(3), pages 615-644, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:eucflr:v:15:y:2018:i:3:p:615-644:n:8
    DOI: 10.1515/ecfr-2018-0020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/ecfr-2018-0020
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/ecfr-2018-0020?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:eucflr:v:15:y:2018:i:3:p:615-644:n:8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.