IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v102y2021i4p1686-1698.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable land urbanization, urban amenities, and population urbanization: Evidence from city‐level data in China

Author

Listed:
  • Songlin Zhang
  • Haoqing Zheng
  • Hongyong Zhou
  • Qing Shao
  • Qun Wu

Abstract

Objective With the emergence of rapid urbanization and the increase in per capita income, migration in China has been changing from economy‐driven to amenity‐driven. We seek to investigate the relation between land urbanization, urban amenities, and population urbanization by analyzing urban amenities in the analytical framework of land urbanization and population urbanization in China. Methods Using panel data of 277 cities in China from 2009 to 2018, we first employ the principal component analysis to calculate urban amenities and then conduct panel threshold model regressions. Results Land urbanization has a positive effect on urban amenities at the individual city level, while urban amenities have a negative effect on population urbanization in both large and small–medium cities. Reforming the household registration system has effectively improved the accessibility of urban amenities for high‐skilled labors in large cities. Thus, amenities in large cities have a positive effect on the urbanization of high‐skilled labors. In contrast, amenities in small–medium cities have a threshold effect on population urbanization. Conclusion Amenities in large and small–medium cities, which are located in the same urban agglomerations, could be coordinated and improved, thus achieving a long‐term sustainable and coordinated development of land and population urbanization.

Suggested Citation

  • Songlin Zhang & Haoqing Zheng & Hongyong Zhou & Qing Shao & Qun Wu, 2021. "Sustainable land urbanization, urban amenities, and population urbanization: Evidence from city‐level data in China," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 102(4), pages 1686-1698, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:102:y:2021:i:4:p:1686-1698
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.13003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13003
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.13003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eli Beracha & Ben T Gilbert & Tyler Kjorstad & Kiplan Womack, 2018. "On the Relation between Local Amenities and House Price Dynamics," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 46(3), pages 612-654, September.
    2. Kam Wing Chan, 2010. "The Household Registration System and Migrant Labor in China: Notes on a Debate," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 36(2), pages 357-364, June.
    3. Xian Huang, 2020. "The Chinese Dream: Hukou, Social Mobility, and Trust in Government," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 101(5), pages 2052-2070, September.
    4. Lichtenberg, Erik & Ding, Chengri, 2009. "Local officials as land developers: Urban spatial expansion in China," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 57-64, July.
    5. Mark D. Partridge, 2010. "The duelling models: NEG vs amenity migration in explaining US engines of growth," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 89(3), pages 513-536, August.
    6. Min Zhang & Mark D. Partridge & Huasheng Song, 2020. "Amenities and the geography of innovation: evidence from Chinese cities," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 65(1), pages 105-145, August.
    7. Dan Li & Yulei Weng & Xiaocong Yang & Kai Zhao, 2019. "Self-Deprecation or Self-Sufficient? Discrimination and Income Aspirations in Urban Labour Market Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-18, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tian Tian & Meizhu Hao & Zhanlu Zhang & Duan Ran, 2024. "Urbanization in Dynamics: The Influence of Land Quota Trading on Land and Population Urbanization," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-20, January.
    2. Hannah L. Paul & Andrew Q. Philips, 2022. "What goes up must come down: Theory and model specification of threshold dynamics," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 103(5), pages 1273-1289, September.
    3. Dinglin Zhang & Yangyi Wu & Meitong Liu, 2023. "Characterizing Sprawl Development in Urban China: A Perspective from Urban Amenity," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-17, June.
    4. Wenxin Wang & Xia Yang & Xia Gan & Chang Yang & Xiangwen Gong & Si Chen, 2023. "The Differences in the Impact of Economic Structure Adjustment on the Ecological Carrying Capacity of County Education—A Case Study of Chongqing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-17, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qiu, Hui & Liang, Xiao, 2024. "Segmented assimilation of migrant children in urban public schools of China: Impact of family resources and school segregation on their educational aspirations," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    2. Liu, Zekun & Jiang, Caixin & Huang, Jun & Zhang, Weiwen & Li, Xuewen, 2023. "Fiscal incentive, political incentive, and strategic interaction of illegal land use by local governments," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    3. Olli Lehtonen & Markku Tykkyläinen, 2018. "Path dependence in net migration during the ICT boom and two other growth periods: the case of Finland, 1980-2013," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 547-564, August.
    4. Haiting Jiang & Bo Burström & Jiaying Chen & Kristina Burström, 2021. "Rural–Urban Inequalities in Poor Self-Rated Health, Self-Reported Functional Disabilities, and Depression among Chinese Older Adults: Evidence from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study 2," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-15, June.
    5. Gwilym Owen & Yu Chen & Timothy Birabi & Gwilym Pryce & Hui Song & Bifeng Wang, 2023. "Residential segregation of migrants: Disentangling the intersectional and multiscale segregation of migrants in Shijiazhuang, China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(1), pages 166-182, January.
    6. Sun, Nan & Yang, Fan, 2021. "Impacts of internal migration experience on health among middle-aged and older adults—Evidence from China," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    7. Ming Tian & Qingwen Xu & Zhigang Li & Yang Yu, 2022. "Hukou Reform and the “Luohu” of Rural Migrants in Urban China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-10, November.
    8. Chong Lu, 2022. "The effect of migration on rural residents’ intergenerational subjective social status mobility in China," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(5), pages 3279-3308, October.
    9. Martin Andersson & Brian H. S. Kim & Janet E. Kohlhase, 2022. "Editorial: developments at the Annals of regional science 2020–2021," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 68(1), pages 1-7, February.
    10. Nicholas Otis, 2017. "Subjective Well-Being in China: Associations with Absolute, Relative, and Perceived Economic Circumstances," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 132(2), pages 885-905, June.
    11. Gao, Wenwen & de Vries, Walter Timo & Zhao, Qianyu, 2021. "Understanding rural resettlement paths under the increasing versus decreasing balance land use policy in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    12. Shen, Ke & Zeng, Yi, 2014. "Direct and indirect effects of childhood conditions on survival and health among male and female elderly in China," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 207-214.
    13. Ploeckl, Florian, 2012. "Endowments and market access; the size of towns in historical perspective: Saxony, 1550–1834," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(4), pages 607-618.
    14. Hengzhou Xu & Chuanrong Zhang & Weidong Li & Wenjing Zhang & Hongchun Yin, 2018. "Economic growth and carbon emission in China:a spatial econometric Kuznets curve?," Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci/Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Economics and Business, vol. 36(1), pages 11-28.
    15. Xie, Xiaoxia & Huang, Chien-Chung & Chen, Yafan & Hao, Feng, 2019. "Intelligent robots and rural children," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 283-290.
    16. Tang, Peng & Feng, Yue & Li, Min & Zhang, Yanyan, 2021. "Can the performance evaluation change from central government suppress illegal land use in local governments? A new interpretation of Chinese decentralisation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    17. Jan K. Brueckner & Shihe Fu & Yizhen Gu & Junfu Zhang, 2017. "Measuring the Stringency of Land Use Regulation: The Case of China's Building Height Limits," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 99(4), pages 663-677, July.
    18. Fengrui Jing & Lin Liu & Suhong Zhou & Guangwen Song, 2020. "Examining the Relationship between Hukou Status, Perceived Neighborhood Conditions, and Fear of Crime in Guangzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-19, November.
    19. Chau, Nancy H. & Qin, Yu & Zhang, Weiwen, 2016. "Leader Networks and Transaction Costs: A Chinese Experiment in Interjurisdictional Contracting," IZA Discussion Papers 9641, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    20. Zhao, Renjie & Chen, Jie & Feng, Chen & Zhong, Shihu, 2020. "The impact of anti-corruption measures on land supply and the associated implications: The case of China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:102:y:2021:i:4:p:1686-1698. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.