IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/eurcho/v20y2021i1p67-70.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Time to Resurrect Buffer Stocks?

Author

Listed:
  • John McClintock

Abstract

Volatile food prices create problems for consumers and farmers the world over. Buffer stocks offer a way out. A buffer stock is a quantity of grain owned by the government which sets a price band via a maximum price and a minimum price for grain. By buying and selling grain from the buffer stock on the open market, the government can keep the domestic price within its desired price band and thus avoid unstable prices. A buffer stock does not require the government to forecast the future price of grain and is entirely compatible with a market economy; the government is effectively exploiting the forces of supply and demand to influence the market price. A buffer stock is also compatible with free international trade. In using a buffer stock to stabilise its domestic price of grain, a government helps to stabilise the world price. In contrast, a government which resorts to trade measures to stabilise its domestic price can cause the world price to become less stable. In this article it is argued that all countries – rich and poor alike – would do their consumers, their farmers and the world as a whole a favour if they were to set up buffer stocks. La volatilité des prix des denrées alimentaires pose des problèmes aux consommateurs et aux agriculteurs du monde entier. Les stocks tampons offrent une solution. Un stock tampon est une quantité de céréales détenue par les pouvoirs publics qui fixent une fourchette de prix avec un prix maximum et un prix minimum pour les céréales. En achetant et en vendant des céréales du stock tampon sur le marché libre, les pouvoirs publics peuvent maintenir le prix intérieur dans la fourchette de prix souhaitée et ainsi éviter des prix instables. Un stock tampon n'oblige pas les pouvoirs publics à prévoir le prix futur des céréales et est entièrement compatible avec une économie de marché; les pouvoirs publics exploitent effectivement les forces de l'offre et de la demande pour influencer le prix du marché. Un stock tampon est également compatible avec le libre‐échange international. En utilisant un stock tampon pour stabiliser le prix intérieur des céréales, les pouvoirs publics contribuent à stabiliser le prix mondial. En revanche, un état qui recourt à des mesures commerciales pour stabiliser son prix intérieur peut rendre le prix mondial moins stable. Dans cet article, il est avancé que tous les pays ‐ riches comme pauvres ‐ rendraient service à leurs consommateurs, à leurs agriculteurs et au monde entier s'ils mettaient en place des stocks tampons. Schwankende Lebensmittelpreise stellen für Verbraucherinnen und Verbraucher sowie für die Landwirtschaft weltweit ein Problem dar. Buffer‐Stocks können eine Lösung sein. Hierbei handelt es sich um Getreidemengen, die der Staat besitzt und für die er eine Preisspanne mit einem Maximum‐ und einem Minimumpreis festlegt. Über den Kauf und Verkauf von Getreide aus dem Buffer‐Stock auf dem freien Markt kann ein Staat den inländischen Preis in der gewünschten Preisspanne halten und so schwankende Preise vermeiden. Buffer‐Stocks machen es für die Regierung nicht nötig, die zukünftigen Getreidepreise vorauszusagen. Darüber hinaus sind sie vollständig mit der Marktwirtschaft vereinbar, denn der Staat nutzt auf effektive Weise die Kräfte von Angebot und Nachfrage, um den Marktpreis zu beeinflussen. Buffer‐Stocks sind ebenso mit dem freien internationalen Handel im Einklang. Indem ein Staat Buffer‐Stocks einsetzt, um den inländischen Getreidepreis zu stabilisieren, trägt er dazu bei, den Weltmarkpreis zu stabilisieren. Im Gegensatz dazu können Handelsmaßnahmen eines Staates zur Stabilisierung des Inlandspreises dazu führen, dass der Weltmarktpreis instabiler wird. In diesem Beitrag argumentieren wir, dass alle Länder – sowohl reiche als auch arme – ihren Verbraucherinnen und Verbrauchern sowie der Landwirtschaft und der Welt insgesamt etwas Gutes täten, wenn sie Buffer‐Stocks einrichten würden.

Suggested Citation

  • John McClintock, 2021. "Time to Resurrect Buffer Stocks?," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 20(1), pages 67-70, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:eurcho:v:20:y:2021:i:1:p:67-70
    DOI: 10.1111/1746-692X.12306
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-692X.12306
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1746-692X.12306?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jun Yang & Huanguang Qiu & Jikun Huang & Scott Rozelle, 2008. "Fighting global food price rises in the developing world: the response of China and its effect on domestic and world markets," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 39(s1), pages 453-464, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stéphane Blancard & Maximin Bonnet & Jean-François Hoarau, 2020. "The specific role of agriculture for economic vulnerability of small island spaces," TEPP Working Paper 2020-01, TEPP.
    2. Lingling Wang & Tsunemi Watanabe, 2016. "A Stackelberg Game Theoretic Analysis of Incentive Effects under Perceived Risk for China’s Straw-Based Power Plant Supply Chain," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-20, June.
    3. Jin Guo & Tetsuji Tanaka, 2019. "Determinants of international price volatility transmissions: the role of self-sufficiency rates in wheat-importing countries," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(1), pages 1-13, December.
    4. Joseph I. Uduji & Elda Nduka Okolo-Obasi & Simplice Anutechia Asongu, 2021. "Analysis of farmers’ food price volatility and Nigeria’s growth enhancement support scheme," African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(4), pages 463-478, June.
    5. Boroumand, Raphaël Homayoun & Porcher, Thomas, 2023. "Volatility contagion and connectedness between WTI and commodity markets," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 58(PA).
    6. Joseph I. Uduji & Elda N. Okolo-Obasi & Simplice A. Asongu, 2020. "Analysis of Farmers’ Food Price Volatility and Nigeria’s Growth Enhancement Support Scheme," Working Papers 20/069, European Xtramile Centre of African Studies (EXCAS).
    7. Brockhaus, Jan & Kalkuhl, Matthias & Kozicka, Marta, 2016. "What Drives India’s Rice Stocks? Empirical Evidence," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 235659, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    8. Sun, Yanpeng & Mirza, Nawazish & Qadeer, Abdul & Hsueh, Hsin-Pei, 2021. "Connectedness between oil and agricultural commodity prices during tranquil and volatile period. Is crude oil a victim indeed?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    9. Li, J. & Chavas, J.-P., 2018. "How Have China s Agricultural Price Support Policies Affected Market Prices?: A Quantile Regression Evaluation," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277557, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    10. Yang, Fan & Urban, Kirsten & Brockmeier, Martina & Bekkers, Eddy & Francois, Joseph, 2016. "Impact of Increasing Agricultural Domestic Support on Food Price Transmission," Conference papers 332806, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    11. Jena, Sangram Keshari & Tiwari, Aviral Kumar & Aikins Abakah, Emmanuel Joel & Hammoudeh, Shawkat, 2022. "The connectedness in the world petroleum futures markets using a Quantile VAR approach," Journal of Commodity Markets, Elsevier, vol. 27(C).
    12. Tetsuji Tanaka & Nobuhiro Hosoe, 2011. "What Drove the Crop Price Hikes in the Food Crisis?," GRIPS Discussion Papers 11-16, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies.
    13. Hovhannisyan, Vardges & Shanoyan, Aleksan, 2018. "An Empirical Analysis Of Welfare Consequences Of Rising Food Prices In Urban China: The Easi Approach," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 273987, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    14. Sonal Devesh & Abdullah M. Asrul Affendi, 2021. "Modelling the Impact of Oil Price on Food Imports: Case of Oman," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 11(4), pages 113-120.
    15. Wusheng Yu & Hans G. Jensen, 2010. "China’s Agricultural Policy Transition: Impacts of Recent Reforms and Future Scenarios," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(2), pages 343-368, June.
    16. Jing Zhu & Wusheng Yu & Junying Wang & Christian Elleby, 2016. "Tariff Liberalisation, Price Transmission and Rural Welfare in China," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 67(1), pages 24-46, February.
    17. Ding Chen & Umar Muhammad Gummi & Shan-Bing Lu & Asiya Mu'azu, 2020. "Modelling the impact of oil price fluctuations on food price in high and low-income oil exporting countries," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 66(10), pages 458-468.
    18. Pieters, Hannah & Swinnen, Johan, 2016. "Trading-off volatility and distortions? Food policy during price spikes," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 27-39.
    19. Havlík, Petr & Schneider, Uwe A. & Schmid, Erwin & Böttcher, Hannes & Fritz, Steffen & Skalský, Rastislav & Aoki, Kentaro & Cara, Stéphane De & Kindermann, Georg & Kraxner, Florian & Leduc, Sylvain & , 2011. "Global land-use implications of first and second generation biofuel targets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(10), pages 5690-5702, October.
    20. Taghizadeh-Hesary, Farhad & Rasoulinezhad, Ehsan & Yoshino, Naoyuki, 2019. "Energy and Food Security: Linkages through Price Volatility," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 796-806.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:eurcho:v:20:y:2021:i:1:p:67-70. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.