IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/eurcho/v19y2020i3p20-25.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Covid‐19 will Change the Agri‐food System – but how?

Author

Listed:
  • Krijn Poppe

Abstract

The Covid‐19 pandemic has highlighted vulnerabilities in the agri‐food system and wider society. The elderly, in particular, have been overrepresented in intensive care units. The resulting economic crisis and accelerating geopolitical shifts will change the agri‐food system, but it is unclear how this will play out in detail. Two factors are important to consider: will societal priorities change and will the state become more interventionist? We examine these uncertainties via four scenarios from a Dutch perspective. ‘Business as usual’ is realistic if the crises are short and manageable. ‘Government Control’ is more state interventionist, after several decades of neo‐liberalism, with a greater focus on the economy and employment as the agri‐food system is confronted with a long recession. ‘Regional Communities’ is where there is a long period of echo‐pandemics, in which a flourishing community spirit, the attention to nature and a healthy living environment with healthy food are permanent and short supply chains and multifunctional agriculture gain ground. In ‘Green High‐Tech Transformation’, the most extreme scenario, the state and technical innovation take on a much larger role in society and our views on our lifestyle change. These trends reinforce each other and the government is tasked with creating a new economy. The scenarios are not predictions but can be used to structure thought and discussion on the way forward. La pandémie de Covid‐19 a mis en évidence les vulnérabilités du système agroalimentaire et de la société en général. Les personnes âgées, en particulier, sont surreprésentées dans les unités de soins intensifs. La crise économique résultant de la pandémie et l'accélération des changements géopolitiques vont changer le système agroalimentaire, mais on ne sait pas comment exactement. Il est important de considérer deux questions : les priorités sociétales changeront‐elles et l’État deviendra‐t‐il plus interventionniste ? A l'aide de quatre scénarios, nous examinons ces incertitudes d'un point de vue néerlandais. Le « statu quo » est réaliste si les crises sont courtes et gérables. Le scénario « contrôle gouvernemental » envisage un État plus interventionniste après plusieurs décennies de néolibéralisme, avec une plus grande attention portée sur l’économie et l'emploi, le système agroalimentaire étant confronté à une longue récession. Le scénarios « communautés régionales » envisage une longue période d’écho‐pandémies dans laquelle un esprit communautaire florissant, l'attention à la nature et un environnement de vie sain avec des aliments sains se pérennisent, et les chaînes d'approvisionnement courtes et l'agriculture multifonctionnelle gagnent du terrain. Dans le scénario le plus extrême de « Transformation verte par les technologies de pointe verte », l’État et l'innovation technique jouent un rôle beaucoup plus important dans la société et nos opinions sur notre mode de vie changent. Ces tendances se renforcent mutuellement et le gouvernement est chargé de créer une nouvelle économie. Les scénarios ne sont pas des prévisions mais structurent la réflexion et la discussion sur la voie à suivre. Die Covid‐19‐Pandemie hat die Schwachstellen im Agrar‐ und Lebensmittelsystem und in der Gesellschaft insgesamt aufgezeigt. Vor allem ältere Menschen waren auf den Intensivstationen überrepräsentiert. Die aus der Pandemie resultierende Wirtschaftskrise und die sich beschleunigenden geopolitischen Verschiebungen werden das Agrar‐ und Lebensmittelsystem verändern. Dabei ist noch unklar, wie sich diese im Einzelnen auswirken werden. Zwei Faktoren sollten in dieser Hinsicht Berücksichtigung finden: Werden sich die gesellschaftlichen Prioritäten ändern und wird der Staat stärker eingreifen? Wir untersuchen diese Unsicherheitsfaktoren anhand von vier Szenarien aus niederländischer Sicht. „Business as usual” ist realistisch, wenn die Krisen kurz und überschaubar sind. Die „Regierungskontrolle” wird nach mehreren Jahrzehnten Neoliberalismus zunehmend staatlicher und interventionistischer werden. Hierbei werden Wirtschaft und Beschäftigung stärker im Fokus stehen, da das Agrar‐ und Lebensmittelsystem mit einer langen Rezession konfrontiert sein wird. „Regionale Gemeinschaften” werden dort entstehen, wo es einen lang andauernden Zeitraum mit Echo‐Pandemien gibt. In den „Regionalen Gemeinschaften” werden ein blühender Gemeinschaftssinn, Achtung der Natur und ein gesundes Lebensumfeld mit gesunden Nahrungsmitteln von Dauer sein. Dazu gewinnen kurze Lieferketten und eine multifunktionale Landwirtschaft an Boden. Bei der „Grünen High‐Tech‐Transformation”, dem extremsten Szenario, nehmen der Staat und technische Innovationen eine viel größere Rolle in der Gesellschaft ein – und ebenfalls in Bezug auf unsere Ansichten über die Änderung unseres Lebensstils. Diese Trends verstärken sich gegenseitig, wobei der Regierung die Aufgabe zukommt, eine neue Wirtschaftsform zu entwickeln. Die genannten Szenarien stellen keine Vorhersagen dar, sondern strukturieren Gedanken und Diskussionen beim weiteren Vorgehen.

Suggested Citation

  • Krijn Poppe, 2020. "Covid‐19 will Change the Agri‐food System – but how?," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 19(3), pages 20-25, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:eurcho:v:19:y:2020:i:3:p:20-25
    DOI: 10.1111/1746-692X.12276
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-692X.12276
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1746-692X.12276?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Olivier De Schutter, 2017. "The political economy of food systems reform," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 44(4), pages 705-731.
    2. Oliver E. Williamson, 2000. "The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 38(3), pages 595-613, September.
    3. repec:oup:erevae:v:44:y:2017:i:4:p:540-566. is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ehlers, Melf-Hinrich & Finger, Robert & El Benni, Nadja & Gocht, Alexander & Sørensen, Claus Aage Grøn & Gusset, Markus & Pfeifer, Catherine & Poppe, Krijn & Regan, Áine & Rose, David Christian & Wolf, 2022. "Scenarios for European agricultural policymaking in the era of digitalisation," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Louise O Fresco & Floor Geerling-Eiff & Anne-Charlotte Hoes & Lan van Wassenaer & Krijn J Poppe & Jack G A J van der Vorst, 2021. "Sustainable food systems: do agricultural economists have a role? [Interdisciplinary collaboration between natural and social sciences–status and trends exemplified in groundwater research]," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 48(4), pages 694-718.
    2. Brousseau, Eric & Raynaud, Emmanuel, 2011. "“Climbing the hierarchical ladders of rules”: A life-cycle theory of institutional evolution," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 79(1), pages 65-79.
    3. Citera, Emanuele & Sau, Lino, 2019. "Complexity, Conventions and Instability: the role of monetary policy," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis. Working Papers 201924, University of Turin.
    4. Emmanuel Yeboah-Assiamah & Kobus Muller & Kwame Ameyaw Domfeh, 2018. "‘Complex crisis’ and the rise of collaborative natural resource governance: institutional trajectory of a wildlife governance experience in Ghana," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 20(5), pages 2205-2224, October.
    5. Markus Groth, 2005. "Auctions in an outcome-based payment scheme to reward ecological services in agriculture – Conception, implementation and results," ERSA conference papers ersa05p180, European Regional Science Association.
    6. Eicher, Theo S. & Schreiber, Till, 2010. "Structural policies and growth: Time series evidence from a natural experiment," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 169-179, January.
    7. Engelhardt, Sebastian v. & Freytag, Andreas, 2013. "Institutions, culture, and open source," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 90-110.
    8. Stephanie Rosenkranz & Patrick W. Schmitz, 2007. "Can Coasean Bargaining Justify Pigouvian Taxation?," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 74(296), pages 573-585, November.
    9. Adam P. Balcerzak, 2011. "Institutional integration in the European Union. Suggestion for measurement," Ekonomia i Prawo, Uniwersytet Mikolaja Kopernika, vol. 7(1), pages 17-34, December.
    10. Dong, Zhiqiang & Zhang, Yongjing, 2016. "Accumulated social capital, institutional quality, and economic performance: Evidence from China," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 206-219.
    11. Asai, Masayasu & Langer, Vibeke & Frederiksen, Pia & Jacobsen, Brian H., 2014. "Livestock farmer perceptions of successful collaborative arrangements for manure exchange: A study in Denmark," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 55-65.
    12. Elisa D?Adamo, 2018. "La Cost-Benefit Analysis delle grandi infrastrutture: un riesame del Large Hadron Collider (LHC) del CERN," PRISMA Economia - Societ? - Lavoro, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(1-2), pages 97-108.
    13. Annie Tubadji & Peter Nijkamp, 2015. "Cultural Gravity Effects among Migrants: A Comparative Analysis of the EU15," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 91(3), pages 343-380, July.
    14. Daniel Scholten & Rolf Künneke, 2016. "Towards the Comprehensive Design of Energy Infrastructures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-24, December.
    15. Peter G. Klein & Michael E. Sykuta, 2010. "Editors’ Introduction," Chapters, in: Peter G. Klein & Michael E. Sykuta (ed.), The Elgar Companion to Transaction Cost Economics, chapter 1, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    16. Osei-Tutu, Francis & Weill, Laurent, 2023. "Individualism reduces borrower discouragement," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 370-385.
    17. Maximilian Benner, 2021. "System-level agency and its many shades: How to shape the system for path development?," PEGIS geo-disc-2021_10, Institute for Economic Geography and GIScience, Department of Socioeconomics, Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    18. Kwon, Seokbeom & Motohashi, Kazuyuki, 2017. "How institutional arrangements in the National Innovation System affect industrial competitiveness: A study of Japan and the U.S. with multiagent simulation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 221-235.
    19. Mogha, Vipin & Williams, Benjamin, 2021. "Culture and capital structure: What else to the puzzle?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    20. Andrés Gómez León & Martín Bermúdez Urdaneta, 2008. "El lugar de la nueva economía política en la ciencia económica," Documentos de Trabajo, Escuela de Economía 4684, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, FCE, CID.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:eurcho:v:19:y:2020:i:3:p:20-25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.