IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/revi24/340957.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Institutional dimension for sustainable development: the relationship of organic and conventional cotton farming with government

Author

Listed:
  • Melo, Paulo Thiago Nunes Bezerra de
  • Bellen, Hans Michael van

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the institutional dimension of conventional and organic cotton farming; specifically, the relationships between farms and government organizations. In both, conventional and organic production systems, the farmers are located in varying institutional environments. These environments include a social capital formed by relationships of trust and cognitive affinities. This study focused on the social capital and guidelines for sustainable development. Multiple study cases were used for explanatory purposes. Such cases refer to a conventional cotton farming business and a civil society organization dedicated to organic cotton farming, both located in the state of Piauí. A comparative analysis perspective was adopted based on the elements of content analysis. The results showed that the conventional cotton farming business comprises relationships with governmental organizations that are predominantly oriented towards economic efficiency purposes, while the family-based organic cotton farming association comprises relationships oriented by economic, social, and environmental objectives. The present study extends the discussion on these topics by analyzing the institutional dimension oriented towards the sustainable development premises.

Suggested Citation

  • Melo, Paulo Thiago Nunes Bezerra de & Bellen, Hans Michael van, 2022. "Institutional dimension for sustainable development: the relationship of organic and conventional cotton farming with government," Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural (RESR), Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural, vol. 60(1), January.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:revi24:340957
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.340957
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/340957/files/Paulo%20Thiago%20Nunes%20Bezerra%20de%20Melo.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.340957?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rob Bijl, 2011. "Never Waste a Good Crisis: Towards Social Sustainable Development," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 102(1), pages 157-168, May.
    2. Joachim H. Spangenberg, 2002. "Institutional sustainability indicators: an analysis of the institutions in Agenda 21 and a draft set of indicators for monitoring their effectivity," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 10(2), pages 103-115.
    3. Sampaio, Gustavo Cristiano & Marini, Marcos Junior & Santos, Gilson Ditzel, 2018. "Capital Social e Ações Conjuntas: um estudo de caso no Arranjo Produtivo de vinhos de altitude catarinense," Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural (RESR), Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural, vol. 56(4), January.
    4. Espinosa, Holmes Rodríguez & Gómez, Carlos Julián Ramírez & Betancur, Luis Fernando Restrepo, 2018. "Factores Determinantes de la Sostenibilidad de las Agroempresas Asociativas Rurales," Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural (RESR), Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural, vol. 56(1), January.
    5. Ruggie, John & Nelson, Tamaryn, 2015. "Human Rights and the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises: Normative Innovations and Implementation Challenges," Working Paper Series rwp15-045, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    6. Ferro, Aline Barrozo & Castro, Eduardo Rodrigues de, 2013. "Determinantes dos Preços de Terras no Brasil: uma análise de região de fronteira agrícola e áreas tradicionais," Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural (RESR), Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural, vol. 51(3), January.
    7. Stefanie Pfahl, 2005. "Institutional sustainability," International Journal of Sustainable Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(1/2), pages 80-96.
    8. Ferro, Aline Barrozo & Castro, Eduardo Rodrigues de, 2013. "Determinantes dos Preços de Terras no Brasil: uma análise de região de fronteira agrícola e áreas tradicionais," Brazilian Journal of Rural Economy and Sociology (Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural-RESR), Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural, vol. 51(3), pages 1-20, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pouria Ataei & Hassan Sadighi & Mohammad Chizari & Enayat Abbasi, 2020. "In-depth content analysis of conservation agriculture training programs in Iran based on sustainability dimensions," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(8), pages 7215-7237, December.
    2. Marques, Felipe César & Telles, Tiago Santos, 2023. "Spatial effects are determinants of agricultural land prices in Brazil," Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural (RESR), Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural, vol. 61(3), January.
    3. Fabio Musso & Gaetano Fausto Esposito, 2018. "Industrial Policies and Institutional Sustainability. The Case of Inner Areas in Italy," Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, in: Ramona Orăștean & Claudia Ogrean & Silvia Cristina Mărginean (ed.), Innovative Business Development—A Global Perspective, pages 219-239, Springer.
    4. Gemma Burford & Elona Hoover & Ismael Velasco & Svatava Janoušková & Alicia Jimenez & Georgia Piggot & Dimity Podger & Marie K. Harder, 2013. "Bringing the “Missing Pillar” into Sustainable Development Goals: Towards Intersubjective Values-Based Indicators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(7), pages 1-25, July.
    5. M. Hussain, 2014. "The Robustness of High Danish National Happiness: A Temporal Cross-Country Analysis of Population Subgroups," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 118(2), pages 759-774, September.
    6. Umberto Berardi, 2013. "Sustainability assessment of urban communities through rating systems," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 15(6), pages 1573-1591, December.
    7. Axel Marx & Franz Ebert & Nicolas Hachez, 2017. "Dispute Settlement for Labour Provisions in EU Free Trade Agreements: Rethinking Current Approaches," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(4), pages 49-59.
    8. Bino Catasús & Sofi Ersson & Jan‐Erik Gröjer & Fan Yang Wallentin, 2007. "What gets measured gets … on indicating, mobilizing and acting," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 20(4), pages 505-521, July.
    9. Banos-González, Isabel & Martínez-Fernández, Julia & Esteve-Selma, Miguel Ángel, 2015. "Dynamic integration of sustainability indicators in insular socio-ecological systems," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 306(C), pages 130-144.
    10. Pan, Wei & Yu, Cong & Bai, Yefei & Du, Jia, 2023. "A four-level hierarchical framework for reviewing infrastructure sustainability assessment systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    11. Yianna Lambrou & Regina Laub, 2006. "Gender, Local Knowledge, and Lessons Learnt in Documenting and Conserving Agrobiodiversity," WIDER Working Paper Series RP2006-69, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    12. Jakub Adamec & Svatava Janoušková & Tomáš Hák, 2021. "How to Measure Sustainable Housing: A Proposal for an Indicator-Based Assessment Tool," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-14, January.
    13. Axel Marx & Jan Wouters, 2017. "Rule Intermediaries in Global Labor Governance," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 670(1), pages 189-206, March.
    14. Michele Ford & Michael Gillan, 2021. "Power resources and supranational mechanisms: The global unions and the OECD Guidelines," European Journal of Industrial Relations, , vol. 27(3), pages 307-325, September.
    15. Kayaga, Sam & Mugabi, Josses & Kingdom, William, 2013. "Evaluating the institutional sustainability of an urban water utility: A conceptual framework and research directions," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 15-27.
    16. Shyamal Gondkar & Sivakumar Sreeramagiri & Edwin Zondervan, 2012. "Methodology for Assessment and Optimization of Industrial Eco-Systems," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-21, June.
    17. Pekka Halla & Albert Merino‐Saum, 2022. "Conceptual frameworks in indicator‐based assessments of urban sustainability—An analysis based on 67 initiatives," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(5), pages 1056-1071, October.
    18. Mimica R. Milošević & Dušan M. Milošević & Ana D. Stanojević & Dragan M. Stević & Dušan J. Simjanović, 2021. "Fuzzy and Interval AHP Approaches in Sustainable Management for the Architectural Heritage in Smart Cities," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-29, February.
    19. Ana Martha Carneiro Pires de Oliveira & João Carlos Gonçalves Lanzinha & Andrea Parisi Kern, 2024. "Building Rehabilitation: A Sustainable Strategy for the Preservation of the Built Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-15, January.
    20. Carolei Domenico, 2022. "Accountability beyond Corporations: The Applicability of the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises to Non-profit Organisations," Nonprofit Policy Forum, De Gruyter, vol. 13(1), pages 31-47, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Environmental Economics and Policy;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:revi24:340957. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inrapfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.