IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ndjtrf/262654.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Multimodal Connectivity at Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Stations and the Impact on Ridership

Author

Listed:
  • Woldeamanuel, Mintesnot
  • Olwert, Craig

Abstract

A multimodality index (MI) is developed to evaluate the accessibility and convenience of transit use by investigating the connectivity of a Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) with other modes of travel. Better connected stations increase transit system ridership, resulting in environmental and social equity gains. The integration of the Orange Line BRT system in Los Angeles with other travel modes, including bicycles, pedestrians, regular buses, and private automobiles, was analyzed using field observations and LA Metro data to create a multimodality index (MI). While multimodal connectivity of the Orange Line BRT system varies across stations, a positive relationship exists between ridership and the MI, indicating that the MI is a reliable predictor of transit ridership and a useful tool for transit planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Woldeamanuel, Mintesnot & Olwert, Craig, 2016. "The Multimodal Connectivity at Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Stations and the Impact on Ridership," Journal of the Transportation Research Forum, Transportation Research Forum, vol. 55(1), April.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ndjtrf:262654
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.262654
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/262654/files/2016v55n1_06_ConnectivityBRT.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/262654/files/2016v55n1_06_ConnectivityBRT.pdf?subformat=pdfa
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.262654?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Keshkamat, S.S. & Looijen, J.M. & Zuidgeest, M.H.P., 2009. "The formulation and evaluation of transport route planning alternatives: a spatial decision support system for the Via Baltica project, Poland," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 54-64.
    2. Bielli, Maurizio & Boulmakoul, Azedine & Mouncif, Hicham, 2006. "Object modeling and path computation for multimodal travel systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(3), pages 1705-1730, December.
    3. Martens, Karel, 2007. "Promoting bike-and-ride: The Dutch experience," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 41(4), pages 326-338, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. José Castillo-Manzano & Antonio Sánchez-Braza, 2013. "Managing a smart bicycle system when demand outstrips supply: the case of the university community in Seville," Transportation, Springer, vol. 40(2), pages 459-477, February.
    2. András Farkas, 2009. "Route/Site Selection of Urban Transportation Facilities: An Integrated GIS/MCDM Approach," Proceedings-7th International Conference on Management, Enterprise and Benchmarking (MEB 2009), in: György Kadocsa (ed.),7th International Conference on Management, Enterprise and Benchmarking MEB 2009-Proceedings, pages 169-184, Óbuda University, Keleti Faculty of Business and Management.
    3. Pucher, John & Buehler, Ralph & Seinen, Mark, 2011. "Bicycling renaissance in North America? An update and re-appraisal of cycling trends and policies," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 45(6), pages 451-475, July.
    4. Médard de Chardon, Cyrille & Caruso, Geoffrey & Thomas, Isabelle, 2017. "Bicycle sharing system ‘success’ determinants," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 202-214.
    5. Zhang, Jie & Wang, David Z.W. & Meng, Meng, 2018. "Which service is better on a linear travel corridor: Park & ride or on-demand public bus?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 803-818.
    6. Vandenbulcke, Grégory & Dujardin, Claire & Thomas, Isabelle & Geus, Bas de & Degraeuwe, Bart & Meeusen, Romain & Panis, Luc Int, 2011. "Cycle commuting in Belgium: Spatial determinants and 're-cycling' strategies," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 118-137, February.
    7. Paraskevi Karanikola & Thomas Panagopoulos & Stilianos Tampakis & Georgios Tsantopoulos, 2018. "Cycling as a Smart and Green Mode of Transport in Small Touristic Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-18, January.
    8. Aidin PARSAKHOO & Mohsen MOSTAFA & Shaban SHATAEE & Majid LOTFALIAN, 2017. "Decision support system to find a skid trail network for extracting marked trees," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 63(2), pages 62-69.
    9. Weliwitiya, Hesara & Rose, Geoffrey & Johnson, Marilyn, 2019. "Bicycle train intermodality: Effects of demography, station characteristics and the built environment," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 395-404.
    10. Piotr Rosik & Julia Wójcik, 2022. "Transport Infrastructure and Regional Development: A Survey of Literature on Wider Economic and Spatial Impacts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, December.
    11. Konstantin Klemmer & Tobias Brandt & Stephen Jarvis, 2018. "Isolating the effect of cycling on local business environments in London," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(12), pages 1-31, December.
    12. Hamidi, Zahra & Camporeale, Rosalia & Caggiani, Leonardo, 2019. "Inequalities in access to bike-and-ride opportunities: Findings for the city of Malmö," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 673-688.
    13. Ehrgott, Matthias & Wang, Judith Y.T. & Raith, Andrea & van Houtte, Chris, 2012. "A bi-objective cyclist route choice model," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(4), pages 652-663.
    14. Li, Haojie & Ding, Hongliang & Ren, Gang & Xu, Chengcheng, 2018. "Effects of the London Cycle Superhighways on the usage of the London Cycle Hire," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 304-315.
    15. Vandenbulcke, Grégory & Thomas, Isabelle & de Geus, Bas & Degraeuwe, Bart & Torfs, Rudi & Meeusen, Romain & Int Panis, Luc, 2009. "Mapping bicycle use and the risk of accidents for commuters who cycle to work in Belgium," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 77-87, March.
    16. Givoni, Moshe & Rietveld, Piet, 2007. "The access journey to the railway station and its role in passengers' satisfaction with rail travel," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 14(5), pages 357-365, September.
    17. Maciej Dobrzyñski & Krzysztof Dziekoñski & Arkadiusz Jurczuk, 2015. "Stakeholders Mapping - A Case Of International Logistics Project," Polish Journal of Management Studies, Czestochowa Technical University, Department of Management, vol. 11(2), pages 17-26, June.
    18. Monika Bąk & Przemyslaw Borkowski, 2019. "Young Transport Users’ Perception of ICT Solutions Change," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-17, July.
    19. Yen, Barbara T.H. & Mulley, Corinne & Yeh, Chia-Jung, 2023. "How public shared bike can assist first and last mile accessibility: A case study of the MRT system in Taipei City, Taiwan," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    20. Bao, Danwen & Hua, Songyi & Gu, Jiayu, 2016. "Relevance of airport accessibility and airport competition," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 52-60.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ndjtrf:262654. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.trforum.org/journal/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.