Top 10% Institutions and Economists in the Field of China, as of January 2012
This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the
RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on
EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by
RePEc, citation analysis performed by
CitEc and popularity data compiled by
LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click
here. Or see the
ranking FAQ.
For China, these are 264 authors affiliated with 619 institutions.
All authors classified in this field.
Top 10% institutions in the field of China
The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in
NEP that have also been announced in
NEP-CNA (China).
| Rank | Score | Institution |
1 | 1.65 | Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge |
2 | 1.89 | World Bank Group, Washington |
(3) | 4.24 | Economics Research, World Bank Group, Washington |
3 | 4.83 | Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam |
4 | 5.15 | Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn |
5 | 6 | Department of Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles |
6 | 6.68 | RAND, Santa Monica |
7 | 6.72 | Economia, Universidade Católica de Brasilia, Brasilia |
(8) | 6.73 | Afdeling Ruimtelijke Economie, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam |
8 | 10.43 | Institut für Volkswirtschaftslehre, Christian-Albrechts-Universität, Kiel |
9 | 10.68 | Cambridge Finance, University of Cambridge, Cambridge |
(10) | 13.43 | Institut für Finanzwissenschaft, Fakultät für Volkswirtschaft und Statistik, Leopold-Franzens-Universität Innsbruck, Innsbruck |
10 | 13.43 | Fakultät für Volkswirtschaft und Statistik, Leopold-Franzens-Universität Innsbruck, Innsbruck |
11 | 13.71 | Economics Department, University of California-Davis, Davis |
12 | 13.97 | Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge |
13 | 14.94 | Economics Department, Yale University, New Haven |
14 | 16.46 | Department of Economics, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley |
15 | 16.48 | Department of Economics, University of Sussex, Brighton |
(16) | 16.97 | Economic Growth Center, Economics Department, Yale University, New Haven |
16 | 17.11 | Department of Economics, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin |
17 | 21.11 | Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford |
17 | 21.11 | Department of Food and Resource Economics, Korea University, Seoul |
19 | 22.05 | Department of Economics, University of Western Ontario, London |
20 | 22.37 | Geary Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin |
(21) | 23.83 | Research School of Economics, College of Business and Economics, Australian National University, Canberra |
21 | 23.83 | College of Business and Economics, Australian National University, Canberra |
(22) | 25.93 | Centre for the Study of African Economies (CSAE), Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford |
22 | 26.01 | International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR), Washington |
23 | 26.55 | Department of Economics, University of Toronto, Toronto |
(24) | 27.25 | Aid Effectiveness Research, World Bank Group, Washington |
24 | 28.32 | International Monetary Fund (IMF), Washington |
25 | 30.56 | Guanghua School of Management, Peking University, Beijing |
(26) | 32.04 | Mossavar-Rahmani Center for Business and Government, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge |
26 | 33.31 | Economics Department, University of California-Santa Cruz (UCSC), Santa Cruz |
27 | 34.21 | Peter G. Peterson Institute for International Economics (IIE), Washington |
28 | 35.84 | School of Economics and Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing |
(29) | 36.2 | Center for International Development, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge |
29 | 37.05 | Ministry of Finance, Government of Bulgaria, Sofia |
30 | 40.13 | School of Economics, University of Nottingham, Nottingham |
31 | 41.82 | Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago |
32 | 42.44 | Institute for Environmental Studies (IVM), Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam |
33 | 42.67 | Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto, Toronto |
(34) | 45.91 | Economic Policy Research Institute (EPRI), Department of Economics, University of Western Ontario, London |
(34) | 45.91 | Centre for the Study of International Economic Relations (CSIER), Department of Economics, University of Western Ontario, London |
34 | 46.5 | National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge |
35 | 47.93 | Department of Economics, International Business School, Brandeis University, Waltham |
36 | 49.59 | School of Business, University of Alberta, Edmonton |
37 | 51.26 | Department of Economics, School of Arts and Sciences, Columbia University, New York City |
38 | 53.31 | Rimini Centre for Economic Analysis (RCEA), Rimini |
39 | 55.02 | Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia |
(40) | 55.04 | Business Economics, Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto, Toronto |
(40) | 55.12 | Macroeconomics and Growth Research, World Bank Group, Washington |
40 | 57.19 | Paris School of Economics, Paris |
(41) | 59.59 | Leverhulme Centre for Research on Globalisation and Economic Policy, School of Economics, University of Nottingham, Nottingham |
41 | 59.86 | Department of Economics, Stanford University, Stanford |
42 | 60.36 | Economics Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge |
43 | 60.99 | Business School, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HKUST), Kowloon |
(43) | 60.99 | Department of Economics, Business School, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HKUST), Kowloon |
44 | 63.81 | School of Economics and Business Administration, Beijing Normal University, Beijing |
(45) | 64.2 | Department of Economics, Tepper School of Business Administration, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh |
45 | 64.2 | Tepper School of Business Administration, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh |
46 | 64.57 | Graduate School of Business, DePaul University, Chicago |
47 | 66.32 | Judge Business School, University of Cambridge, Cambridge |
48 | 66.84 | Institut für Weltwirtschaft (IfW), Kiel |
49 | 67.52 | Tinbergen Instituut, Amsterdam |
50 | 69.26 | Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), London |
(51) | 70.02 | Applied Economics Workshop, Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago |
51 | 70.27 | Bank for International Settlements (BIS), Basel |
52 | 70.55 | Center for Agricutural and Rural Development (CARD), Zhejiang University, Hangzhou |
(53) | 70.81 | Economic Research, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, San Francisco |
53 | 70.81 | Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, San Francisco |
54 | 74 | Institutet för Näringslivsforskning (IFN), Stockholm |
55 | 75.11 | Brookings Institution, Washington |
56 | 76.21 | Department of Economics, Boston University, Boston |
57 | 77.85 | Business School, University of Western Australia, Perth |
58 | 78.56 | Faculty of Business and Economics, Monash University, Clayton |
59 | 79.34 | Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton |
60 | 80.73 | Department of Applied Economics and Management, Cornell University, Ithaca |
61 | 81.08 | Department of Applied Economics, College of Agricultural, Food, and Environmental Sciences, University of Minnesota-St. Paul, St. Paul |
Top 10% authors in the field of China
This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within this field. Authors can register at the
RePEc Author Service.
The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.
Credits:
- Citations from CitEc project by José Manuel Barrueco Cruz, University of Valencia, Spain. Hardware provided by Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas (IVIE), Valencia, Spain.
- Abstract views and downloads statistics from LogEc project by Sune Karlsson, Örebro University, Sweden.
- Author registration by Ivan Kumanov, Minsk, Belarus.
- Institutions database and ranking computations by Christian Zimmermann, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.
- RePEc has been initiated by Thomas Krichel, Long Island University.
We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.
