IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/jhtiwp/182.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Etablierung einer digitalen Aktions- und Vernetzungsplattform Citizen Science am Thünen-Institut

Author

Listed:
  • Werner, Aspasia
  • Richter, Anett
  • Mahdavi, Parastoo
  • Herden, Manina

Abstract

Citizen Science, als Ansatz der Beteiligung von Bürgerinnen und Bürgern sowie Personen mit unterschiedlichen Interessen z.B. Landwirtinnen und Landwirte erlangt zunehmend mehr Beachtung in der Agrar-, Forst-, Fischereiforschung und der Forschung in ländlichen Räumen. Bei der Etablierung von Citizen Science sind Vernetzung, Kommunikation und Kooperation auf Projektebene sowie auf der Ebene der Beteiligten notwendig. Welche Bedürfnisse an Vernetzung, Kommunikation und Kooperation bei Citizen Science bei den potentiellen Beteiligten vorliegen sind vielfach unbekannt. Entsprechend dieser Wissenslücke haben bei der 2. Thünen Citizen Science Fachtagung im Juli 2021 25 Teilnehmende aus sechs Fachinstituten des Thünen Institutes, des Julius-Kühn-Instituts und des Max Rubner-Institus Bedürfnisse und Anforderungen an Vernetzung, Kommunikation und Kooperation in Citizen Science diskutiert. Die Analyse der Tagungsinhalte weist auf ein bestehendes reges Interesse an einer institutsübergreifenden Kooperation, Kommunikation und Vernetzung in Citizen Science hin. Vertiefter fachlicher, methodischer und persönlicher Austausch sind als grundlegende Basis von Citizen Science identifiziert. Darüber hinaus sind ausreichend Möglichkeiten für das Erlernen von Fach- und Persönlichkeitskompetenzen wie z.B. Selbstlerntools und Kompetenzworkshops zu etablieren, um die Forschenden in der erfolgreichen Umsetzung von Citizen Science und partizipativen Projekten zu unterstützen. Für die Entwicklung von Citizen Science in der Agrar-, Forst-, Fischereiforschung und der Forschung in ländlichen Räumen wird eine Aktions- und Vernetzungsplattform als zentrale Einheit der Citizen Science Aktivitäten und Unterstützungen als notwendig erachtet. Der Aufbau der Aktions- und Vernetzungsplattform ist gemeinsam mit den Nutzern der Plattform durchzuführen. Dadurch sollen Citizen Science Aktivitäten gebündelt, Akteure vernetzt und Ressourcen für Citizen Science zur Verfügung gestellt werden. Die erarbeiteten konkreten Anforderungen an die Inhalte und Ressourcen wie z.B. versiertes Konfliktmanagement und Methodenworkshops fließen beim anstehenden Aufbau der Aktions- und Vernetzungsplattform gemeinsamforschen.thuenen.de ein.

Suggested Citation

  • Werner, Aspasia & Richter, Anett & Mahdavi, Parastoo & Herden, Manina, 2021. "Etablierung einer digitalen Aktions- und Vernetzungsplattform Citizen Science am Thünen-Institut," Thünen Working Papers 182, Johann Heinrich von Thünen Institute, Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:jhtiwp:182
    DOI: 10.3220/WP1636531008000
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/247794/1/1777622972.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3220/WP1636531008000?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gautam Ahuja & Giuseppe Soda & Akbar Zaheer, 2012. "The Genesis and Dynamics of Organizational Networks," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(2), pages 434-448, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guiyang Zhang, 2021. "Employee co-invention network dynamics and firm exploratory innovation: the moderation of employee co-invention network centralization and knowledge-employee network equilibrium," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(9), pages 7811-7836, September.
    2. Mário Franco & Lurdes Esteves & Margarida Rodrigues, 2024. "Clusters as a Mechanism of Sharing Knowledge and Innovation: Case Study from a Network Approach," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 25(2), pages 377-400, April.
    3. Flemming Sørensen & Jan Mattsson, 2016. "Speeding Up Innovation: Building Network Structures For Parallel Innovation," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(02), pages 1-30, February.
    4. Gaonkar, Shweta & Mele, Angelo, 2023. "A model of inter-organizational network formation," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 82-104.
    5. Maarten B.T. de Groot & Oli R. Mihalache & Tom Elfring, 2022. "Toward a Theory of Family Social Capital in Wealthy Transgenerational Enterprise Families," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 46(1), pages 159-192, January.
    6. Chen, Feiqiong & Liu, Huiqian & Ge, Yuhao, 2021. "How does integration affect industrial innovation through networks in technology-sourcing overseas M&A? A comparison between China and the US," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 281-292.
    7. Gupeng Zhang & Xiao Wang & Hongbo Duan, 2020. "Obscure but important: examining the indirect effects of alliance networks in exploratory and exploitative innovation paradigms," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 124(3), pages 1745-1764, September.
    8. Lorenzo Zirulia, 2023. "Path dependence in evolving R&D networks," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 149-177, January.
    9. Soda, Giuseppe & Zaheer, Akbar & Sun, Xiaoming & Cui, Wentian, 2021. "Brokerage evolution in innovation contexts: Formal structure, network neighborhoods and knowledge," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(10).
    10. Modic, Dolores & Suklan, Jana, 2023. "Intellectual property coordinators' cohorts: A study into the imprints in university technology transfer," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(8).
    11. Haider, Sajjad & Mariotti, Francesca, 2016. "The orchestration of alliance portfolios: The role of alliance portfolio capability," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 127-141.
    12. Jamshed Raza & Yuxin Liu & Jianwei Zhang & Nan Zhu & Zohaib Hassan & Habib Gul & Sikander Hussain, 2021. "Sustainable Supply Management Practices and Sustainability Performance: The Dynamic Capability Perspective," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440211, March.
    13. Pedersen, Torben & Soda, Giuseppe & Stea, Diego, 2019. "Globally networked: Intraorganizational boundary spanning in the global organization," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 54(3), pages 169-180.
    14. Ilya R. P. Cuypers & Gokhan Ertug & John Cantwell & Akbar Zaheer & Martin Kilduff, 2020. "Making connections: Social networks in international business," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 51(5), pages 714-736, July.
    15. Andrew Peterman & Arno Kourula & Raymond Levitt, 2020. "Organizational roles in a sustainability alliance network," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3314-3330, December.
    16. Ivan Rodrigo Rizzo Dias & George Bedinelli Rossi, 2017. "How far is World Champion from World Class? Institutional effects on a Brazilian non-profit sports organization," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 14(Special I), pages 24-44, January.
    17. Faridah Djellal & Faïz Gallouj, 2018. "Public-private innovation networks in services (RIPPS): A new manifestation of innovation networks within a service economy and sustainable development [Les réseaux d’innovation public-privé dans l," Post-Print hal-01672576, HAL.
    18. Naoki Yasuda, 2016. "State-level Social Capital and MNCs’ Competitive Political Resources," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(1), pages 1-36, December.
    19. Franziska Zuber, 2015. "Spread of Unethical Behavior in Organizations: A Dynamic Social Network Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 131(1), pages 151-172, September.
    20. Zhang, Guiyang & Gao, Yuchen & Qi, Yong, 2022. "National depth and R&D alliance portfolio international expansion: The moderation of technological discontinuity and long-term orientation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Citizen Science; Bedarfsanalyse; Teamdynamik; demandanalysis; team dynamics;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:jhtiwp:182. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vtigvde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.