IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/unu/wpaper/wp-2022-77.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Inclusion amid ethnic inequality: Insights from Brazil's social protection system

Author

Listed:
  • Natasha Borges Sugiyama

Abstract

Policy frames in Brazil have long run up against conflicting visions and understandings about the causes and consequences of group-based inequality. This paper argues that a class-based lens has dominated the social protection framework. In recent years, political leaders have framed social policy measures along 'universal' class lines with the aim of improving poverty and wellbeing. This framing is reflective of Brazil's national narrative on race relations and the idea that class and employment status have been the most salient barriers to social welfare protections.

Suggested Citation

  • Natasha Borges Sugiyama, 2022. "Inclusion amid ethnic inequality: Insights from Brazil's social protection system," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2022-77, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    • Handle: RePEc:unu:wpaper:wp-2022-77
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.wider.unu.edu/sites/default/files/Publications/Working-paper/PDF/wp2022-77-inclusion-amid-ethnic-inequality.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Valentina Flamini & Mr. Frederik G Toscani, 2021. "The Short-Term Impact of COVID-19 on Labor Markets, Poverty and Inequality in Brazil," IMF Working Papers 2021/066, International Monetary Fund.
    2. Loveman, Mara, 2014. "National Colors: Racial Classification and the State in Latin America," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199337361.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrew Francis-Tan & Zheng Mu, 2019. "Racial Revolution: Understanding the Resurgence of Ethnic Minority Identity in Modern China," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 38(5), pages 733-769, October.
    2. da Silva, Nelson & Caetano, Sidney, 2024. "Intensity of labor shocks behind the changes in Brazilian hours worked during the pandemic," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    3. Dóra Chor & Alexandre Pereira & Antonio G Pacheco & Ricardo V Santos & Maria J M Fonseca & Maria I Schmidt & Bruce B Duncan & Sandhi M Barreto & Estela M L Aquino & José G Mill & Maria delCB Molina & , 2019. "Context-dependence of race self-classification: Results from a highly mixed and unequal middle-income country," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(5), pages 1-17, May.
    4. Braulio Güémez & Patricio Solís, 2022. "Ethnoracial and Educational Homogamy in Mexico: A Multidimensional Perspective," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 41(6), pages 2331-2363, December.
    5. Nuno Palma & Jaime Reis & Mengtian Zhang, 2020. "Reconstruction of regional and national population using intermittent census-type data: The case of Portugal, 1527–1864," Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(1), pages 11-27, January.
    6. Luis Monroy-Gómez-Franco & Roberto Vélez-Grajales, 2021. "Skin Tone Differences in Social Mobility in Mexico: Are We Forgetting Regional Variance?," Journal of Economics, Race, and Policy, Springer, vol. 4(4), pages 257-274, December.
    7. Raymundo M. Campos-Vazquez & Eduardo M. Medina-Cortina, 2019. "Skin Color and Social Mobility: Evidence From Mexico," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 56(1), pages 321-343, February.
    8. Telles, Edward E. & Bailey, Stanley R. & Davoudpour, Shahin & Freeman, Nicholas C., 2023. "Racial and ethnic inequality in Latin America," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 120677, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    9. Rohini Somanathan, 2016. "Group Inequality in Democracies: Lessons from Cross-national Experiences," Working papers 260, Centre for Development Economics, Delhi School of Economics.
    10. Stanley R. Bailey & Aliya Saperstein & Andrew Penner, 2014. "Race, color, and income inequality across the Americas," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 31(24), pages 735-756.
    11. René Alejandro Rejón Piña & Chenglong Ma, 2023. "Classification Algorithm for Skin Color (CASCo): A new tool to measure skin color in social science research," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 104(2), pages 168-179, March.
    12. Milena Ang & Yuna Blajer de la Garza, 2021. "Vulnerability, due process, and reform in modern Mexico," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 346-375, September.
    13. G. Reginald Daniel, 2022. "Multiracial Identities in the United States: Towards the Brazilian or South African Paths?," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-24, May.
    14. Yung, Vincent & Colyvas, Jeannette, 2023. "Munging the Ghosts in the Machine: Coded Bias and the Craft of Wrangling Archival Data," SocArXiv 2dve6, Center for Open Science.
    15. Telles, Edward E. & Bailey, Stanley R. & Davoudpour, Shahin & Freeman, Nicholas C., 2023. "Racial and Ethnic Inequality in Latin America," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 13195, Inter-American Development Bank.
    16. McNamee, Lachlan, 2019. "Indirect colonial rule and the salience of ethnicity," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 142-156.
    17. Yasuko Takezawa & Stephen Small, 2022. "Theorizing People of Mixed Race in the Pacific and the Atlantic," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-14, March.
    18. Abigail Nieves Delgado & Jan Baedke, 2021. "Does the human microbiome tell us something about race?," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-12, December.
    19. Mariangela Veikou, 2024. "Slap a Label on It—Civic Registration Categories for (Non)Citizens and the Digital Promise," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-11, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Group-based inequality; Poverty; Race; Welfare; Inclusion; Brazil;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:unu:wpaper:wp-2022-77. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Siméon Rapin (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/widerfi.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.