IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rnp/wpaper/061714.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Russian Agricultural Cooperatives: Regional Features, Economic Behavior, Management and Development Models
[Российские Сельскохозяйственные Кооперативы: Региональные Особенности, Экономическое Поведение, Модели Управления И Развития]

Author

Listed:
  • Nikulin, Alexander (Никулин, Александр)

    (Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA))

  • Sobolev, Alexander (Соболев, Александр)

    (Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA))

  • Trotsuk, Irina (Троцук, Ирина)

    (Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA))

  • Kurakin, Alexander (Куракин, Александр)

    (Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA))

Abstract

From an economic point of view, cooperation is an alternative type of business, which is possible in virtually any field of activity. If people are dissatisfied with how private entrepreneurs or the state meet their needs, they can organize a cooperative, supporting and developing a joint business in the hope of obtaining benefits (the best service or service that is not available in the area). In the context of backdrop of the agriculturally developed countries, Russian cooperation looks extremely depressing. Nevertheless, the state is making attempts to revive the cooperative movement in the country, but it has not been very successful so far. In this connection, the question arises of how cooperatives (as well as small agricultural producers, on which state programs for the development of cooperation are primarily directed) react to similar programs, their economic situation, and what management models there are.

Suggested Citation

  • Nikulin, Alexander (Никулин, Александр) & Sobolev, Alexander (Соболев, Александр) & Trotsuk, Irina (Троцук, Ирина) & Kurakin, Alexander (Куракин, Александр), 2017. "Russian Agricultural Cooperatives: Regional Features, Economic Behavior, Management and Development Models [Российские Сельскохозяйственные Кооперативы: Региональные Особенности, Экономическое Пове," Working Papers 061714, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.
    • Handle: RePEc:rnp:wpaper:061714
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repec.ranepa.ru/rnp/wpaper/061714.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Murray Fulton, 1995. "The Future of Canadian Agricultural Cooperatives: A Property Rights Approach," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 77(5), pages 1144-1152.
    2. Stephen P. Ryan & Mar Reguant & Meredith Fowlie, 2011. "Pollution Permits and the Evolution of Market Structure," 2011 Meeting Papers 1440, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    3. Francesconi, Gian Nicola & Ruben, Ruerd, 2008. "The Life Cycle of Agricultural Cooperatives: Implications for Management and Governance in Ethiopia," Journal of Rural Cooperation, Hebrew University, Center for Agricultural Economic Research, vol. 36(2), pages 1-16.
    4. Novkovic, Sonja & Power, Natasha, 2005. "Agricultural and Rural Cooperative Viability: A Management Strategy Based on Cooperative Principles and Values," Journal of Rural Cooperation, Hebrew University, Center for Agricultural Economic Research, vol. 33(1), pages 1-12.
    5. George Hendrikse & Jos Bijman, 2002. "Ownership Structure in Agrifood Chains: The Marketing Cooperative," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 84(1), pages 104-119.
    6. Hogeland, Julie A., 2002. "The changing federated relationship between local and regional cooperatives," Research Reports 44645, United States Department of Agriculture, Rural Development.
    7. Erwan Lamy & Nadine Levratto, 2004. "L’hypothèse de la triple hélice dans le dispositif français d’innovation : L’hypothèse de la triple hélice dans le dispositif français d’innovation : le cas de l'Auvergne," Industrial Organization 0406009, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Gurung, Rajendra Kumar & Unterschultz, James R., 2007. "Evaluation of Factors Affecting the Choice of Pricing and Payment Practices by Traditional Marketing and New Generation Cooperatives," Journal of Cooperatives, NCERA-210, vol. 20, pages 1-17.
    9. Royer, Jeffrey S. & Ingalsbe, Gene, 1983. "Equity Redemption Guide," Cooperative Information Reports (CIR) 280565, United States Department of Agriculture, Rural Development.
    10. Francesconi, Gian Nicola & Wouterse, Fleur, 2011. "The renewed case for farmers' cooperatives: Diagnostics and implications from Ghana," IFPRI discussion papers 1129, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ahmet Candemir & Sabine Duvaleix & Laure Latruffe, 2021. "Agricultural Cooperatives And Farm Sustainability – A Literature Review," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(4), pages 1118-1144, September.
    2. Hanf, Jon H. & Török, Timea, 2009. "Are Co-operatives a Way to Integrate Small Farmers in Supply Chain Networks? Preliminary Thoughts on Hungary," Journal of Rural Cooperation, Hebrew University, Center for Agricultural Economic Research, vol. 37(1), pages 1-12.
    3. Hanf, Jon Henrich & Pieniadz, Agata, 2007. "Chain Quality Management In Co-Operatives," 47th Annual Conference, Weihenstephan, Germany, September 26-28, 2007 7604, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    4. Hanf, J.H. & Pieniadz, A., 2008. "Chain quality management in co-operatives," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 43, March.
    5. Hanf, Jon Henrich & Pieniadz, Agata, 2007. "What does the 'New Quality' mean in view of Polish dairy cooperatives?," 105th Seminar, March 8-10, 2007, Bologna, Italy 7858, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    6. Peter Bogetoft & Henrik B. Olesen, 2002. "Influence Costs in Heterogeneous Cooperatives: A Formal Model of Sales Distortion," CIE Discussion Papers 2002-05, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics. Centre for Industrial Economics.
    7. Cook, Michael L. & Burress, Molly J. & Iliopoulos, Constantine, 2008. "New Producer Strategies: The Emergence of Patron-Driven Entrepreneurship," 2008 International Congress, August 26-29, 2008, Ghent, Belgium 44397, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    8. Yu, Bingxin & Nin-Pratt, Alejandro & Funes, José & Gemessa, Sinafikeh Asrat, 2011. "Cereal production and technology adoption in Ethiopia:," ESSP working papers 31, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    9. Sexton, Richard J., 1990. "The Role of Cooperatives in Increasingly Concentrated Agricultural Markets," Cooperatives: Their Importance in the Future Food and Agricultural System - FAMC 1990 Conference 265909, Food and Agricultural Marketing Consortium (FAMC).
    10. Fulton, Murray & Giannakas, Konstantinos, 2012. "The Value of a Norm: Open Membership and the Horizon Problem in Cooperatives," Journal of Rural Cooperation, Hebrew University, Center for Agricultural Economic Research, vol. 40(2), pages 1-18.
    11. Ewert, Joachim & Hanf, Jon H. & Schweichert, Erik, 2014. "Adaptation of South African Wine Cooperatives to Challenging Business Environments," Journal of Rural Cooperation, Hebrew University, Center for Agricultural Economic Research, vol. 42(2), pages 1-16.
    12. Karin Hakelius & Jerker Nilsson, 2020. "The Logic behind the Internal Governance of Sweden’s Largest Agricultural Cooperatives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-19, October.
    13. Hendrikse, G.W.J. & Veerman, C.P., 2003. "On The Future of Co-operatives," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2003-007-ORG, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    14. Kenkel, Philip L. & Hagerman, Amy D., 2004. "Impact of the Farmland Bankruptcy on Oklahoma Cooperatives," 2004 Annual Meeting, November 2-3 31793, NCERA-194 Research on Cooperatives.
    15. Cadot, Julien, 2013. "Agency costs, vertical integration and ownership structure: the case of wine business in France," 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C. 149677, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    16. Iselborn, M. & Jungbluth, L. & Hanf, J.H., 2015. "Probleme des Qualitätsmanagements bei Winzergenossenschaften," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 50, March.
    17. Jos Bijman & Markus Hanisch & Ger Sangen, 2014. "Shifting Control? The Change of Internal Governance in Agricultural Cooperatives in the EU," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 85(4), pages 641-661, December.
    18. Francesconi, Gian Nicola & Wouterse, Fleur, 2011. "The renewed case for farmers' cooperatives: Diagnostics and implications from Ghana," IFPRI discussion papers 1129, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    19. H. Holly WANG & Jong Won PARK & Timothy BAKER, 2011. "Contracting, negotiation, and the policy change: The conflict between Korean farmers and their agricultural coo," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 57(10), pages 467-473.
    20. Pennerstorfer, Dieter & Weiss, Christoph R., 2011. "Do Cooperatives Offer High Quality Products? Theory and Empirical Evidence from the Wine Market," 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland 115741, European Association of Agricultural Economists.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnp:wpaper:061714. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RANEPA maintainer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aneeeru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.