Equilibrium selection in infinitely repeated games with communication
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
DOI: 10.25932/publishup-63180
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- Yu Awaya & Vijay Krishna, 2016. "On Communication and Collusion," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 106(2), pages 285-315, February.
- Simon Gächter & Elke Renner, 2010.
"The effects of (incentivized) belief elicitation in public goods experiments,"
Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 13(3), pages 364-377, September.
- Simon Gaechter & Elke Renner, 2006. "The Effects of (Incentivized) Belief Elicitation in Public Good Experiments," Discussion Papers 2006-16, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
- Simon Gaechter & Elke Renner, 2010. "The effects of (incentivized) belief elicitation in public goods experiments," Discussion Papers 2010-12, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
- Pedro Dal Bó, 2005.
"Cooperation under the Shadow of the Future: Experimental Evidence from Infinitely Repeated Games,"
American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 95(5), pages 1591-1604, December.
- Pedro Dal BÛ, 2002. "Cooperation Under the Shadow of the Future: Experimental Evidence from Infinitely Repeated Games," Working Papers 2002-20, Brown University, Department of Economics.
- David J. Cooper & Kai-Uwe K?hn, 2014.
"Communication, Renegotiation, and the Scope for Collusion,"
American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 6(2), pages 247-278, May.
- Kühn, Kai-Uwe & Cooper, David J., 2009. "Communication, Renegotiation, and the Scope for Collusion," CEPR Discussion Papers 7563, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Ellingsen, Tore & Östling, Robert & Wengström, Erik, 2018. "How does communication affect beliefs in one-shot games with complete information?," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 153-181.
- Drew Fudenberg & David G. Rand & Anna Dreber, 2012.
"Slow to Anger and Fast to Forgive: Cooperation in an Uncertain World,"
American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 102(2), pages 720-749, April.
- Rand, David G & Fudenberg, Drew & Dreber, Anna, 2012. "Slow to Anger and Fast to Forgive: Cooperation in an Uncertain World," Scholarly Articles 11223697, Harvard University Department of Economics.
- Pedro Dal Bó & Guillaume R. Fréchette, 2018. "On the Determinants of Cooperation in Infinitely Repeated Games: A Survey," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 56(1), pages 60-114, March.
- Bard Harstad, 2012. "Climate Contracts: A Game of Emissions, Investments, Negotiations, and Renegotiations," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 79(4), pages 1527-1557.
- Andres, Maximilian & Bruttel, Lisa & Friedrichsen, Jana, 2023.
"How communication makes the difference between a cartel and tacit collusion: A machine learning approach,"
European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
- Andres, Maximilian & Bruttel, Lisa & Friedrichsen, Jana, 2023. "How communication makes the difference between a cartel and tacit collusion: A machine learning approach," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 152, pages 1-1.
- Maximilian Andres & Lisa Bruttel & Jana Friedrichsen, 2022. "How Communication Makes the Difference between a Cartel and Tacit Collusion: A Machine Learning Approach," CESifo Working Paper Series 10024, CESifo.
- Maximilian Andres & Lisa Bruttel & Jana Friedrichsen, 2022. "How communication makes the difference between a cartel and tacit collusion: a machine learning approach," CEPA Discussion Papers 53, Center for Economic Policy Analysis.
- Maximilian Andres & Lisa Bruttel & Jana Friedrichsen, 2022. "How Communication Makes the Difference between a Cartel and Tacit Collusion: A Machine Learning Approach," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 2000, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
- Fonseca, Miguel A. & Normann, Hans-Theo, 2012.
"Explicit vs. tacit collusion—The impact of communication in oligopoly experiments,"
European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(8), pages 1759-1772.
- Fonseca, Miguel A. & Normann, Hans-Theo, 2012. "Explicit vs. tacit collusion: The impact of communication in oligopoly experiments," DICE Discussion Papers 65, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).
- Both, F. & Adam, M.T.P. & Hariharan, A. & Dorner, V. & Lux, E. & Weinhardt, C., 2016. "A randomized tabu search-based approach for perfect stranger matching in economic experiments," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 235-238.
- Pedro Dal Bo & Guillaume R. Frochette, 2011.
"The Evolution of Cooperation in Infinitely Repeated Games: Experimental Evidence,"
American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 101(1), pages 411-429, February.
- Pedro Dal Bo & Guillaume R. Frechette, 2007. "The Evolution of Cooperation in Infinitely Repeated Games: Experimental Evidence," Working Papers 2007-7, Brown University, Department of Economics.
- Matthias Blonski & Peter Ockenfels & Giancarlo Spagnolo, 2011. "Equilibrium Selection in the Repeated Prisoner's Dilemma: Axiomatic Approach and Experimental Evidence," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 3(3), pages 164-192, August.
- Lisa Bruttel & Ulrich Kamecke, 2012. "Infinity in the lab. How do people play repeated games?," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 72(2), pages 205-219, February.
- Yves Breitmoser, 2015.
"Cooperation, but No Reciprocity: Individual Strategies in the Repeated Prisoner's Dilemma,"
American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 105(9), pages 2882-2910, September.
- Breitmoser, Yves, 2012. "Cooperation, but no reciprocity: Individual strategies in the repeated Prisoner's Dilemma," MPRA Paper 41731, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Maria Bigoni & Sven-Olof Fridolfsson & Chloé Le Coq & Giancarlo Spagnolo, 2012. "fines, leniency, and rewards in antitrust," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 43(2), pages 368-390, June.
- David J. Cooper & John H. Kagel, 2023. "Using Team Discussions to Understand Behavior in Indefinitely Repeated Prisoner's Dilemma Games," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 15(4), pages 114-145, November.
- Emiliano Catonini, 2021. "Self-enforcing Agreements and Forward Induction Reasoning," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 88(2), pages 610-642.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Lisa Bruttel & Maximilian Andres, 2024. "Communicating Cartel Intentions," CEPA Discussion Papers 77, Center for Economic Policy Analysis.
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.- Maximilian Andres, 2023. "Communication in the Infinitely Repeated Prisoner's Dilemma: Theory and Experiments," Papers 2304.12297, arXiv.org.
- Heller, Yuval & Tubul, Itay, 2023. "Strategies in the repeated prisoner’s dilemma: A cluster analysis," MPRA Paper 117444, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Andres, Maximilian & Bruttel, Lisa & Friedrichsen, Jana, 2021.
"The leniency rule revisited: Experiments on cartel formation with open communication,"
International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
- Andres, Maximilian & Bruttel, Lisa & Friedrichsen, Jana, 2021. "The leniency rule revisited: Experiments on cartel formation with open communication," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 76, pages 1-1.
- Maximilian Andres & Lisa Bruttel & Jana Friedrichsen, 2021. "The Leniency Rule Revisited: Experiments on Cartel Formation with Open Communication," CEPA Discussion Papers 24, Center for Economic Policy Analysis.
- Maximilian Andres & Lisa Bruttel & Jana Friedrichsen, 2021. "The Leniency Rule Revisited: Experiments on Cartel Formation with Open Communication," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1926, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
- Bigoni, Maria & Camera, Gabriele & Casari, Marco, 2020.
"Money is more than memory,"
Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 99-115.
- Bigoni, Maria & Camera, Gabriele & Casari, Marco, 2014. "Money is more than memory," CFS Working Paper Series 496, Center for Financial Studies (CFS).
- Maria Bigoni & Gabriele Camera & Marco Casari, 2014. "Money is More than a Memory," Working Papers 14-17, Chapman University, Economic Science Institute.
- Maria Bigoni & Gabriele Camera & Marco Casari, 2018. "Money Is More Than Memory," Working Papers 18-17, Chapman University, Economic Science Institute.
- M. Bigoni & G. Camera & M. Casari, 2015. "Money is more than memory," Working Papers wp1030, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.
- Fabian Dvorak & Sebastian Fehrler, 2024.
"Negotiating Cooperation under Uncertainty: Communication in Noisy, Indefinitely Repeated Interactions,"
American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 16(3), pages 232-258, August.
- Fabian Dvorak & Sebastian Fehrler, 2018. "Negotiating Cooperation Under Uncertainty: Communication in Noisy, Indefinitely Repeated Interactions," TWI Research Paper Series 112, Thurgauer Wirtschaftsinstitut, Universität Konstanz.
- Dvorak, Fabian & Fehrler, Sebastian, 2018. "Negotiating Cooperation under Uncertainty: Communication in Noisy, Indefinitely Repeated Interactions," IZA Discussion Papers 11897, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- Normann, Hans-Theo & Sternberg, Martin, 2022. "Human-algorithm interaction: Algorithmic pricing in hybrid laboratory markets," DICE Discussion Papers 392, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).
- Normann, Hans-Theo & Sternberg, Martin, 2023. "Human-algorithm interaction: Algorithmic pricing in hybrid laboratory markets," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
- Hans-Theo Normann & Martin Sternberg, 2021. "Human-Algorithm Interaction: Algorithmic Pricing in Hybrid Laboratory Markets," Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 2021_11, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, revised 13 Apr 2022.
- Dijkstra, Peter T., 2015. "Price leadership and unequal market sharing: Collusion in experimental markets," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 80-97.
- Eugenio Proto & Aldo Rustichini & Andis Sofianos, 2020.
"Intelligence, Errors and Strategic Choices in the Repeated Prisoners Dilemma,"
Working Papers
2020_07, Business School - Economics, University of Glasgow.
- Eugenio Proto & Aldo Rustichini & Andis Sofianos, 2020. "Intelligence, Errors and Strategic Choices in the Repeated Prisoners' Dilemma," CESifo Working Paper Series 8068, CESifo.
- Proto, Eugenio & Rustichini, Aldo & Sofianos, Andis, 2020. "Intelligence, Errors and Strategic Choices in the Repeated Prisoners' Dilemma," IZA Discussion Papers 12925, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- Proto, Eugenio & Rustichini, Aldo & Sofianos, Andis, 2020. "Intelligence, Errors and Strategic Choices in the Repeated Prisoners' Dilemma," CEPR Discussion Papers 14349, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Maximilian Andres & Lisa Bruttel & Jana Friedrichsen, 2019. "The Effect of a Leniency Rule on Cartel Formation and Stability: Experiments with Open Communication," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1835, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
- Yves Breitmoser, 2015.
"Cooperation, but No Reciprocity: Individual Strategies in the Repeated Prisoner's Dilemma,"
American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 105(9), pages 2882-2910, September.
- Breitmoser, Yves, 2012. "Cooperation, but no reciprocity: Individual strategies in the repeated Prisoner's Dilemma," MPRA Paper 41731, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Andres, Maximilian & Bruttel, Lisa & Friedrichsen, Jana, 2023.
"How communication makes the difference between a cartel and tacit collusion: A machine learning approach,"
European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
- Andres, Maximilian & Bruttel, Lisa & Friedrichsen, Jana, 2023. "How communication makes the difference between a cartel and tacit collusion: A machine learning approach," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 152, pages 1-1.
- Maximilian Andres & Lisa Bruttel & Jana Friedrichsen, 2022. "How Communication Makes the Difference between a Cartel and Tacit Collusion: A Machine Learning Approach," CESifo Working Paper Series 10024, CESifo.
- Maximilian Andres & Lisa Bruttel & Jana Friedrichsen, 2022. "How communication makes the difference between a cartel and tacit collusion: a machine learning approach," CEPA Discussion Papers 53, Center for Economic Policy Analysis.
- Maximilian Andres & Lisa Bruttel & Jana Friedrichsen, 2022. "How Communication Makes the Difference between a Cartel and Tacit Collusion: A Machine Learning Approach," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 2000, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
- Marco Lambrecht & Eugenio Proto & Aldo Rustichini & Andis Sofianos, 2024.
"Intelligence Disclosure and Cooperation in Repeated Interactions,"
American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 16(3), pages 199-231, August.
- Marco Lambrecht & Eugenio Proto & Aldo Rustichini & Andis Sofianos, 2021. "Intelligence Disclosure and Cooperation in Repeated Interactions," CESifo Working Paper Series 9372, CESifo.
- Lambrecht, Marco & Proto, Eugenio & Rustichini, Aldo & Sofianos, Andis, 2022. "Intelligence Disclosure and Cooperation in Repeated Interactions," IZA Discussion Papers 15438, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- Proto, Eugenio & Lambrecht, Marco & Rustichini, Aldo & Sofianos, Andis, 2021. "Intelligence Disclosure and Cooperation in Repeated Interactions," CEPR Discussion Papers 16656, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Matthew Embrey & Friederike Mengel & Ronald Peeters, 2016. "Strategy Revision Opportunities and Collusion," Working Paper Series 8716, Department of Economics, University of Sussex.
- Ghidoni, Riccardo & Suetens, Sigrid, 2019.
"Empirical Evidence on Repeated Sequential Games,"
Other publications TiSEM
ff3a441f-e196-4e45-ba59-c, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
- Suetens, Sigrid & Ghidoni, Riccardo, 2019. "Empirical evidence on repeated sequential games," CEPR Discussion Papers 13809, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Ghidoni, Riccardo & Suetens, Sigrid, 2019. "Empirical Evidence on Repeated Sequential Games," Discussion Paper 2019-016, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
- Matthew Embrey & Friederike Mengel & Ronald Peeters, 2019.
"Strategy revision opportunities and collusion,"
Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 22(4), pages 834-856, December.
- Matthew Embrey & Friederike Mengel & Ronald Peeters, 2016. "Strategy Revision Opportunities and Collusion," Working Paper Series 08716, Department of Economics, University of Sussex Business School.
- Masaki Aoyagi & Guillaume Frechette & Sevgi Yuksel, 2021. "Beliefs in Repeated Games," ISER Discussion Paper 1119rr, Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University, revised May 2022.
- Pablo Hernandez-Lagos & Dylan Minor & Dana Sisak, 2017.
"Do people who care about others cooperate more? Experimental evidence from relative incentive pay,"
Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 20(4), pages 809-835, December.
- Pablo Hernandez & Dylan Minor & Dana Sisak, 2015. "Do People Who Care About Others Cooperate More? Experimental Evidence from Relative Incentive Pay," Harvard Business School Working Papers 16-040, Harvard Business School.
- Georg Clemens & Holger A. Rau, 2019. "Do discriminatory leniency policies fight hard‐core cartels?," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(2), pages 336-354, April.
More about this item
Keywords
cooperation; communication; infinitely repeated game; machine learning;All these keywords.
JEL classification:
- C73 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Stochastic and Dynamic Games; Evolutionary Games
- C92 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - Laboratory, Group Behavior
- D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
NEP fields
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:- NEP-EXP-2024-04-22 (Experimental Economics)
- NEP-GTH-2024-04-22 (Game Theory)
Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pot:cepadp:75. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marco Winkler (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepotde.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.