Auctioning to Buyers with Correlated Values
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Other versions of this item:
- Robert Hammond, 2011. "Auctioning to buyers with correlated values," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(5), pages 405-409.
References listed on IDEAS
- Charles A. Holt & Susan K. Laury, 2002. "Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 92(5), pages 1644-1655, December.
- Ruqu Wang, 1998. "Auctions versus Posted-Price Selling: The Case of Correlated Private Valuations," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 31(2), pages 395-410, May.
- Kagel, John H & Harstad, Ronald M & Levin, Dan, 1987. "Information Impact and Allocation Rules in Auctions with Affiliated Private Values: A Laboratory Study," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 55(6), pages 1275-1304, November.
- Levin, Dan & Smith, James L, 1996. "Optimal Reservation Prices in Auctions," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 106(438), pages 1271-1283, September.
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.- Brunner, Christoph & Hu, Audrey & Oechssler, Jörg, 2014.
"Premium auctions and risk preferences: An experimental study,"
Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 467-484.
- Brunner, Christoph & Hu, Audrey & Oechssler, Jörg, 2013. "Premium Auctions and Risk Preferences: An Experimental Study," Working Papers 0544, University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics.
- Andreas Roider & Patrick W. Schmitz, 2012.
"Auctions with Anticipated Emotions: Overbidding, Underbidding, and Optimal Reserve Prices,"
Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 114(3), pages 808-830, September.
- Schmitz, Patrick W. & Roider, Andreas, 2007. "Auctions with Anticipated Emotions: Overbidding, Underbidding, and Optimal Reserve Prices," CEPR Discussion Papers 6476, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Drichoutis, Andreas C. & Nayga, Rodolfo M. & Lusk, Jayson L. & Lazaridis, Panagiotis, 2012.
"When a risky prospect is valued more than its best possible outcome,"
Judgment and Decision Making, Cambridge University Press, vol. 7(1), pages 1-18, January.
- Andreas C. Drichoutis & Rodolfo M. Nayga & Jayson L. Lusk & Panagiotis Lazaridis, 2012. "When a risky prospect is valued more than its best possible outcome," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 7(1), pages 1-18, January.
- Andreas C. Drichoutis & Rodolfo M. Nayga, Jr. & Jayson L. Lusk & Panagiotis Lazaridis, 2009. "When a risky prospect is valued more than its best possible outcome," Working Papers 2009-12, Agricultural University of Athens, Department Of Agricultural Economics.
- Grebe, Tim & Ivanova-Stenzel, Radosveta & Kröger, Sabine, 2021. "How do sellers benefit from Buy-It-Now prices in eBay auctions?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 189-205.
- Sujoy Chakravarty & Jaideep Roy, 2009. "Recursive expected utility and the separation of attitudes towards risk and ambiguity: an experimental study," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 66(3), pages 199-228, March.
- Glenn W. Harrison & John A. List, 2004.
"Field Experiments,"
Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 42(4), pages 1009-1055, December.
- Glenn Harrison & John List, 2004. "Field experiments," Artefactual Field Experiments 00058, The Field Experiments Website.
- John List & David Reiley, 2008. "Field experiments," Artefactual Field Experiments 00091, The Field Experiments Website.
- Oliver Kirchkamp & Wladislaw Mill, 2019. "Spite vs. risk: explaining overbidding," CESifo Working Paper Series 7631, CESifo.
- Freeman, David J. & Kimbrough, Erik O. & Reiss, J. Philipp, 2020.
"Opportunity cost, inattention and the bidder’s curse,"
European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
- David Freeman & Erik O. Kimbrough & J. Philipp Reiss, 2017. "Opportunity cost, inattention and the bidder's curse," Discussion Papers dp17-04, Department of Economics, Simon Fraser University.
- Freeman, David & Kimbrough, Erik O. & Reiss, J. Philipp, 2017. "Opportunity cost, inattention and the bidder's curse," Working Paper Series in Economics 101, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Department of Economics and Management.
- Pagnozzi, Marco & Saral, Krista J., 2019.
"Auctions with limited liability through default or resale,"
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 51-74.
- Marco Pagnozzi & Krista J. Saral, 2018. "Auctions with Limited Liability through Default or Resale," CSEF Working Papers 494, Centre for Studies in Economics and Finance (CSEF), University of Naples, Italy.
- Marco Pagnozzi & Krista Saral, 2019. "Auctions with limited liability through default or resale," Post-Print halshs-02010914, HAL.
- Kirchkamp, Oliver & Mill, Wladislaw, 2021. "Spite vs. risk: Explaining overbidding in the second-price all-pay auction," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 616-635.
- Ben Casner, 2021. "Learning while shopping: an experimental investigation into the effect of learning on consumer search," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 24(1), pages 238-273, March.
- Tan, Charmaine H.Y., 2020. "Overbidding and matching rules in second-price auctions: An experimental study," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
- Yu Yvette Zhang & Rodolfo M Nayga Jr. & Dinah Pura T Depositario, 2019. "Learning and the possibility of losing own money reduce overbidding: Delayed payment in experimental auctions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(5), pages 1-19, May.
- Joyce Delnoij & Kris Jaegher, 2020. "Competing first-price and second-price auctions," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 69(1), pages 183-216, February.
- Kirchkamp, O. & Reiss, J.P. & Sadrieh, A., 2008. "A pure variation of risk in private-value auctions," Research Memorandum 050, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
- Andrew M. Davis & Elena Katok & Anthony M. Kwasnica, 2011. "Do Auctioneers Pick Optimal Reserve Prices?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(1), pages 177-192, January.
- Christopher N. Boyer & B. Wade Brorsen & James R. Fain, 2015. "Private‐Value Auction Versus Posted‐Price Selling: An Agent‐Based Model Approach," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(4), pages 249-262, October.
- Rosato, Antonio & Tymula, Agnieszka A., 2024.
"A novel experimental test of truthful bidding in second-price auctions with real objects,"
Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
- Rosato, Antonio & Tymula, Agnieszka, 2022. "A novel experimental test of truthful bidding in second-price auctions with real objects," MPRA Paper 115427, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Thomas Giebe & Radosveta Ivanova-Stenzel & Martin G. Kocher & Simeon Schudy, 2024.
"Cross-game learning and cognitive ability in auctions,"
Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 27(1), pages 80-108, March.
- Thomas Giebe & Radosveta Ivanova-Stenzel & Martin G. Kocher & Simeon Schudy, 2021. "Cross-Game Learning and Cognitive Ability in Auctions," CESifo Working Paper Series 9396, CESifo.
- Giebe, Thomas & Ivanova-Stenzel, Radosveta & Kocher, Martin G. & Schudy, Simeon, 2022. "Cross-game Learning and Cognitive Ability in Auctions," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 358, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
- repec:cup:judgdm:v:7:y:2012:i:1:p:1-18 is not listed on IDEAS
- Christopher Boyer & B. Brorsen & Tong Zhang, 2014. "Common-value auction versus posted-price selling: an agent-based model approach," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 9(1), pages 129-149, April.
More about this item
Keywords
Auction; correlated values; monopoly; laboratory experiment;All these keywords.
JEL classification:
- D44 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design - - - Auctions
- L12 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Monopoly; Monopolization Strategies
- C91 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - Laboratory, Individual Behavior
Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ncs:wpaper:021. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Theofanis Tsoulouhas (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dencsus.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.