IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/luk/wpaper/8627.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Continuing Decentralization of People and Jobs in the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Donghwan An
  • Peter Gordon
  • Harry W. Richardson

Abstract

Although the full picture is necessarily complex and many commentators are pointing to signs of re-centralization, population and employment in the 3132 counties of the U.S. continues to decentralize. This is based on an analysis of annual data from the Regional Economic Information System (REIS) by the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA, of the U.S. Department of Commerce) that describes population and employment and income for seven major economic sectors for all counties over the years 1969-1999. The more specific conclusions of this analysis are as follows. First, Frostbelt-Sunbelt migration remains a powerful trend. Climate counts. Second, the facts do not support the idea of a "return to the cities", "regeneration", or any resurgence of compact development despite a strong policy interest in achieving such outcomes. Third, the dominant trends show an ebb and flow over time between growth in exurban and in suburban locations. Suburban growth was concentrated in the middle-sized metro areas. Exurban areas and rural counties usually performed better than core counties. Consistently, the core counties of the largest metro areas have fared worst, even in the most recent period (1995-99) when they did a little better. Fourth, most firms no longer have to seek locations in traditional high-density centers to achieve agglomeration economies; they can either do without them or find them in low-density regions. Finally, most planners in pursuit of "smart growth" are attempting to counter potent market trends in favor of more dispersal, potentially a costly strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Donghwan An & Peter Gordon & Harry W. Richardson, 2002. "The Continuing Decentralization of People and Jobs in the United States," Working Paper 8627, USC Lusk Center for Real Estate.
  • Handle: RePEc:luk:wpaper:8627
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://lusk.usc.edu/sites/default/files/working_papers/wp_2002-2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Edward L. Glaeser & Matthew E. Kahn, 2001. "Decentralized Employment and the Transformation of the American City," Harvard Institute of Economic Research Working Papers 1912, Harvard - Institute of Economic Research.
    2. Carlino, Gerald A., 1985. "Declining city productivity and the growth of rural regions: A test of alternative explanations," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 11-27, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matthew J. Holian & Matthew E. Kahn, 2014. "Household Demand for Low Carbon Public Policies: Evidence from California," NBER Working Papers 19965, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Theodore M. Crone, 1997. "Where have all the factory jobs gone - and why?," Business Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, issue May, pages 3-18.
    3. Gilles Sénécal & Pierre J. Hamel & Jean-Pierre Collin & Kathryn Jastremski & Nathalie Vachon & Marie-Ève Lafortune, 2013. "Daily Mobility and Residential Migrations in the Montréal Metropolitan Region," SAGE Open, , vol. 3(3), pages 21582440134, June.
    4. Daniel J. Graham & Nigel Spence, 2000. "Manufacturing Employment Change, Output Demand, and Labor Productivity in the Regions of Britain," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 23(2), pages 172-200, April.
    5. Michael A. Stoll, 2006. "Job sprawl, spatial mismatch, and black employment disadvantage," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(4), pages 827-854.
    6. Eric A. Hanushek & Kuzey Yilmaz, 2007. "Schools and Location: Tiebout, Alonso, and Government Policy," NBER Working Papers 12960, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    7. Duranton, Gilles & Puga, Diego, 2014. "The Growth of Cities," Handbook of Economic Growth, in: Philippe Aghion & Steven Durlauf (ed.), Handbook of Economic Growth, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 5, pages 781-853, Elsevier.
    8. Michael A. Stoll, 2005. "Geographical Skills Mismatch, Job Search and Race," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 42(4), pages 695-717, April.
    9. Zębik Grzegorz, 2011. "Typology of Suburban Communities in Poland," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 16(16), pages 173-188, January.
    10. Chunil Kim & Choongik Choi, 2019. "Towards Sustainable Urban Spatial Structure: Does Decentralization Reduce Commuting Times?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-28, February.
    11. Paul R. Blackley, 1986. "Urban-Rural Variations in the Structure of Manufacturing Production," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 23(6), pages 471-483, December.
    12. Jeroen Bakker, 2012. "The changing spatial economic structure of the state of Michigan, through 1970-2008," NEURUS papers neurusp150, NEURUS - Network of European and US Regional and Urban Studies.
    13. Gaigné, Carl & Riou, Stéphane & Thisse, Jacques-François, 2016. "How to make the metropolitan area work? Neither big government, nor laissez-faire," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 100-113.
    14. William R. Kerr & Scott Duke Kominers, 2015. "Agglomerative Forces and Cluster Shapes," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 97(4), pages 877-899, October.
    15. Edward L. Glaeser & Matthew E. Kahn, 2001. "Decentralized Employment and the Transformation of the American City," Harvard Institute of Economic Research Working Papers 1912, Harvard - Institute of Economic Research.
    16. William A. Testa, 1993. "Trends and prospects for rural manufacturing," Economic Perspectives, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, vol. 17(Mar), pages 27-36.
    17. Felix Büchel & Harminder Battu, 2003. "The Theory of Differential Overqualification: Does it Work?," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 50(1), pages 1-16, February.
    18. Peter Mayerhofer & Oliver Fritz & Dieter Pennerstorfer, 2010. "Dritter Bericht zur internationalen Wettbewerbsfähigkeit Wiens," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 42430.
    19. Elisabet Viladecans Marsal, 2002. "The growth of cities: Does agglomeration matter?," Working Papers 2002/3, Institut d'Economia de Barcelona (IEB).
    20. Kuzey Yılmaz & Muharrem Yeşilırmak, 2023. "Access to transportation, residential segregation, and economic opportunity," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 41(1), pages 103-127, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:luk:wpaper:8627. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Steins (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lcuscus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.