IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/keo/dpaper/2016-014.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Empirical Analysis on Industry Specialization of Audit Firms and Its Audit Quality

Author

Listed:
  • Ryo Kato

    (Graduate School of Economics, Keio University)

  • Hu Dan Semba

    (School of Economics, Nagoya University)

Abstract

This study aims to empirically examine the influence of the auditor's industry specialization on its audit quality. Following the dissolution of ChuoAoyama?PricewaterhouseCoopers in 2007, the Japanese Big N audit market changed from Big 4 regime to Big 3 regime. Consistent with previous studies, absolute discretionary accruals are used as a proxy for audit quality along with six proxy variables for audit industry specialization. Additionally, we employed propensity score adjustment as a causal inference framework in order to lead more robust results. After analyzing a sample of publicly listed Japanese firms for fiscal years 2001 to 2006 (Big 4 period) and 2008 to 2012 (Big 3 period), we find that Japanese auditors perform higher quality audits during whole period. In addition, industry-specialized auditors' audit quality increases at a higher rate than for non-industry-specialized auditors in the Big 3 period compared to the Big 4 period.

Suggested Citation

  • Ryo Kato & Hu Dan Semba, 2016. "Empirical Analysis on Industry Specialization of Audit Firms and Its Audit Quality," Keio-IES Discussion Paper Series 2016-014, Institute for Economics Studies, Keio University.
    • Handle: RePEc:keo:dpaper:2016-014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ies.keio.ac.jp/upload/pdf/en/DP2016-014.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Audit Quality; Industry Specialization; Causal Inference; Propensity Score; IPW;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting
    • M42 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Auditing

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:keo:dpaper:2016-014. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Institute for Economics Studies, Keio University (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iekeijp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.