IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iwe/workpr/180.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Polish perspective on 2008-2009 budget review

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Wisniewski

    (Institute of World Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies, Hungarian Academy of Sciences)

Abstract

Positive experience of EU membership has reassured Poland of the merits of an integration model based on social solidarity and a free market, which it wishes to continue. Poland’s position focuses on three main areas: cohesion policy, Common Agricultural Policy and EU Neighbourhood Policy. It seeks to retain these, though receptive to change in response to new challenges facing the EU (e.g. demographic change, sustainable development, and alleviating effects of globalization). In view of the new EU tasks, Poland does not favour further reduction in the EU budget. Debate could be made more constructive by splitting off discussion of the revenue side. Greater autonomy for the own-resources system would facilitate debate and allow needful financial development of the new European policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Wisniewski, 2008. "The Polish perspective on 2008-2009 budget review," IWE Working Papers 180, Institute for World Economics - Centre for Economic and Regional Studies.
  • Handle: RePEc:iwe:workpr:180
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://vgi.krtk.hu/publikacio/no-180-2008-06/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iwe:workpr:180. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kanász Mária (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vkhashu.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.