The Chamberlin-Courant Rule and the k-Scoring Rules: Agreement and Condorcet Committee Consistency
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Other versions of this item:
- Mostapha Diss & Eric Kamwa & Abdelmonaim Tlidi, 2018. "The Chamberlin-Courant Rule and the k-Scoring Rules: Agreement and Condorcet Committee Consistency," Working Papers hal-01757761, HAL.
- Mostapha Diss & Eric Kamwa & Abdelmonaim Tlidi, 2018. "The Chamberlin-Courant Rule and the k-Scoring Rules: Agreement and Condorcet Committee Consistency," Working Papers halshs-01817943, HAL.
References listed on IDEAS
- Hatem Smaoui & Dominique Lepelley & Issofa Moyouwou, 2016.
"Borda elimination rule and monotonicity paradoxes in three-candidate elections,"
Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 36(3), pages 1722-1728.
- Hatem Smaoui & Dominique Lepelley & Issofa Moyouwou, 2016. "Borda elimination rule and monotonicity paradoxes in three-candidate elections," Post-Print hal-01452550, HAL.
- Diss, Mostapha & Louichi, Ahmed & Merlin, Vincent & Smaoui, Hatem, 2012.
"An example of probability computations under the IAC assumption: The stability of scoring rules,"
Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pages 57-66.
- Mostapha Diss & Ahmed Louichi & Vincent Merlin & H. Smaoui, 2012. "An example of probability computations under the IAC assumption: The stability of scoring rules," Post-Print halshs-00667660, HAL.
- Ariel Procaccia & Jeffrey Rosenschein & Aviv Zohar, 2008. "On the complexity of achieving proportional representation," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 30(3), pages 353-362, April.
- Dominique Lepelley & Ahmed Louichi & Hatem Smaoui, 2008.
"On Ehrhart polynomials and probability calculations in voting theory,"
Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 30(3), pages 363-383, April.
- Dominique Lepelley & Ahmed Louichi & Hatem Smaoui, 2006. "On Ehrhart Polynomials and Probability Calculations in Voting Theory," Economics Working Paper Archive (University of Rennes & University of Caen) 200610, Center for Research in Economics and Management (CREM), University of Rennes, University of Caen and CNRS.
- Dominique Lepelley & Ahmed Louichi & Hatem Smaoui, 2007. "On Ehrhart polynomials and probability calculations in voting theory," Post-Print hal-01245310, HAL.
- Mostapha Diss & Ahmed Doghmi, 2016.
"Multi-winner scoring election methods: Condorcet consistency and paradoxes,"
Public Choice, Springer, vol. 169(1), pages 97-116, October.
- Mostapha Diss & Ahmed Doghmi, 2016. "Multi-winner scoring election methods: Condorcet consistency and paradoxes," Working Papers halshs-01285526, HAL.
- Mostapha Diss & Ahmed Doghmi, 2016. "Multi-winner scoring election methods: Condorcet consistency and paradoxes," Post-Print halshs-01381394, HAL.
- Mostapha Diss & Ahmed Doghmi, 2016. "Multi-winner scoring election methods: Condorcet consistency and paradoxes," Working Papers 1613, Groupe d'Analyse et de Théorie Economique Lyon St-Étienne (GATE Lyon St-Étienne), Université de Lyon.
- William Gehrlein & Dominique Lepelley & Issofa Moyouwou, 2015.
"Voters’ preference diversity, concepts of agreement and Condorcet’s paradox,"
Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 49(6), pages 2345-2368, November.
- William V. Gehrlein & Dominique Lepelley & Issofa Moyouwou, 2015. "Voters’ preference diversity, concepts of agreement and Condorcet’s paradox," Post-Print hal-01452557, HAL.
- Gehrlein, William V. & Lepelley, Dominique & Moyouwou, Issofa, 2016.
"A note on Approval Voting and electing the Condorcet loser,"
Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 115-122.
- William V. Gehrlein & Dominique Lepelley & Issofa Moyouwou, 2016. "A note on Approval Voting and electing the Condorcet loser," Post-Print hal-01452548, HAL.
- Mostapha Diss, 2015.
"Strategic manipulability of self-selective social choice rules,"
Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 229(1), pages 347-376, June.
- Mostapha Diss, 2013. "Strategic manipulability of self-selective social choice rules," Working Papers 1302, Groupe d'Analyse et de Théorie Economique Lyon St-Étienne (GATE Lyon St-Étienne), Université de Lyon.
- Mostapha Diss, 2013. "Strategic manipulability of self-selective social choice rules," Working Papers halshs-00785366, HAL.
- Mostapha Diss, 2015. "Strategic manipulability of self-selective social choice rules," Post-Print halshs-01136401, HAL.
- Wilson, Mark C. & Pritchard, Geoffrey, 2007. "Probability calculations under the IAC hypothesis," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 54(3), pages 244-256, December.
- Sébastien Courtin & Mathieu Martin & Issofa Moyouwou, 2015. "The $$q$$ q -majority efficiency of positional rules," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 79(1), pages 31-49, July.
- Davide Cervone & William Gehrlein & William Zwicker, 2005. "Which Scoring Rule Maximizes Condorcet Efficiency Under Iac?," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 58(2), pages 145-185, March.
- Salvador Barberà & Danilo Coelho, 2008.
"How to choose a non-controversial list with k names,"
Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 31(1), pages 79-96, June.
- Salvador Barberà & Danilo Coelho, 2006. "How to choose a non-controversial list with k names," Working Papers 291, Barcelona School of Economics.
- Salvador Barberà & Danilo Coelho, 2006. "How to choose a non-controversial list with k names," UFAE and IAE Working Papers 675.06, Unitat de Fonaments de l'Anàlisi Econòmica (UAB) and Institut d'Anàlisi Econòmica (CSIC).
- Gehrlein, William V., 1985. "The Condorcet criterion and committee selection," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 10(3), pages 199-209, December.
- Thomas C. Ratliff, 2003. "Some startling inconsistencies when electing committees," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 21(3), pages 433-454, December.
- Dominique Lepelley & Issofa Moyouwou & Hatem Smaoui, 2018.
"Monotonicity paradoxes in three-candidate elections using scoring elimination rules,"
Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 50(1), pages 1-33, January.
- Dominique Lepelley & Issofa Moyouwou & Hatem Smaoui, 2018. "Monotonicity paradoxes in three-candidate elections using scoring elimination rules," Post-Print hal-01697627, HAL.
- Kamwa, Eric & Merlin, Vincent, 2015.
"Scoring rules over subsets of alternatives: Consistency and paradoxes,"
Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 130-138.
- Eric Kamwa & Vincent Merlin, 2014. "Scoring Rules over Subsets of Alternatives: Consistency and Paradoxes," Economics Working Paper Archive (University of Rennes & University of Caen) 201412, Center for Research in Economics and Management (CREM), University of Rennes, University of Caen and CNRS.
- Eric Kamwa & Vincent Merlin, 2015. "Scoring rules over subsets of alternatives: Consistency and paradoxes," Post-Print hal-01702492, HAL.
- Mostapha Diss & William Gehrlein, 2012.
"Borda’s Paradox with weighted scoring rules,"
Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 38(1), pages 121-136, January.
- Mostapha Diss & William V. Gehrlein, 2012. "Borda's Paradox with weighted scoring rules," Post-Print halshs-00759869, HAL.
- Bock, Hans-Hermann & Day, William H. E. & McMorris, F. R., 1998. "Consensus rules for committee elections," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 219-232, May.
- Haris Aziz & Markus Brill & Vincent Conitzer & Edith Elkind & Rupert Freeman & Toby Walsh, 2017. "Justified representation in approval-based committee voting," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 48(2), pages 461-485, February.
- Mostapha Diss & William V. Gehrlein, 2015.
"The True Impact of Voting Rule Selection on Condorcet Efficiency,"
Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 35(4), pages 2418-2426.
- Mostapha Diss, 2015. "The True Impact of Voting Rule Selection on Condorcet Efficiency," Post-Print halshs-01231013, HAL.
- Mostapha Diss & William V. Gehrlein, 2015. "The True Impact of Voting Rule Selection on Condorcet Efficiency," Post-Print halshs-01236333, HAL.
- Young, H. P., 1974. "An axiomatization of Borda's rule," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 9(1), pages 43-52, September.
- Sébastien Courtin & Mathieu Martin & Issofa Moyouwou, 2015. "The q-majority efficiency of positional rules," Post-Print hal-00914907, HAL.
- Eric Kamwa & Vincent Merlin, 2015. "Scoring rules over subsets of alternatives: Consistency and paradoxes," Post-Print halshs-01238563, HAL.
- William V. Gehrlein & Dominique Lepelley, 2011. "Voting Paradoxes and Group Coherence," Studies in Choice and Welfare, Springer, number 978-3-642-03107-6, December.
- Edith Elkind & Piotr Faliszewski & Piotr Skowron & Arkadii Slinko, 2017. "Properties of multiwinner voting rules," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 48(3), pages 599-632, March.
- William V. Gehrlein & Dominique Lepelley, 2017.
"Elections, Voting Rules and Paradoxical Outcomes,"
Studies in Choice and Welfare,
Springer, number 978-3-319-64659-6, December.
- William V. Gehrlein & Dominique Lepelley, 2017. "Elections, Voting Rules and Paradoxical Outcomes," Post-Print hal-03571730, HAL.
- Kamwa, Eric, 2017.
"On stable rules for selecting committees,"
Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 36-44.
- Eric Kamwa, 2017. "On stable rules for selecting committees," Post-Print hal-01631177, HAL.
- Debord, Bernard, 1993. "Prudent k-choice functions: properties and algorithms," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 63-77, July.
- Eric Kamwa & Fabrice Valognes, 2017.
"Scoring Rules and Preference Restrictions: The Strong Borda Paradox Revisited,"
Revue d'économie politique, Dalloz, vol. 127(3), pages 375-395.
- Eric Kamwa & Fabrice Valognes, 2017. "Scoring Rules and Preference Restrictions: The Strong Borda Paradox Revisited," Post-Print hal-01631180, HAL.
- William V. Gehrlein & Dominique Lepelley, 2017. "Two-Stage Election Procedures," Studies in Choice and Welfare, in: Elections, Voting Rules and Paradoxical Outcomes, chapter 0, pages 117-140, Springer.
- Edith Elkind & Jérôme Lang & Abdallah Saffidine, 2015. "Condorcet winning sets," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 44(3), pages 493-517, March.
- Chamberlin, John R. & Courant, Paul N., 1983. "Representative Deliberations and Representative Decisions: Proportional Representation and the Borda Rule," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 77(3), pages 718-733, September.
- D. Marc Kilgour & Steven J. Brams & M. Remzi Sanver, 2006. "How to Elect a Representative Committee Using Approval Balloting," Studies in Choice and Welfare, in: Bruno Simeone & Friedrich Pukelsheim (ed.), Mathematics and Democracy, pages 83-95, Springer.
- D. Marc Kilgour & Erica Marshall, 2012. "Approval Balloting for Fixed-Size Committees," Studies in Choice and Welfare, in: Dan S. Felsenthal & Moshé Machover (ed.), Electoral Systems, chapter 0, pages 305-326, Springer.
- Barış Kaymak & M. Remzi Sanver, 2003. "Sets of alternatives as Condorcet winners," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 20(3), pages 477-494, June.
- Gehrlein, William V. & Fishburn, Peter C., 1976. "The probability of the paradox of voting: A computable solution," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 14-25, August.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- David McCune & Erin Martin & Grant Latina & Kaitlyn Simms, 2023. "A Comparison of Sequential Ranked-Choice Voting and Single Transferable Vote," Papers 2306.17341, arXiv.org.
- Diss, Mostapha & Mahajne, Muhammad, 2020.
"Social acceptability of Condorcet committees,"
Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 14-27.
- Mostapha Diss & Muhammad Mahajne, 2019. "Social Acceptability of Condorcet Committees," Working Papers halshs-02011732, HAL.
- Mostapha Diss & Muhammad Mahajne, 2019. "Social Acceptability of Condorcet Committees," Working Papers halshs-02003292, HAL.
- Mostapha Diss & Muhammad Mahajne, 2019. "Social Acceptability of Condorcet Committees," Working Papers 1906, Groupe d'Analyse et de Théorie Economique Lyon St-Étienne (GATE Lyon St-Étienne), Université de Lyon.
- David McCune & Erin Martin & Grant Latina & Kaitlyn Simms, 2024. "A comparison of sequential ranked-choice voting and single transferable vote," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 643-670, April.
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.- Mostapha Diss & Eric Kamwa & Abdelmonaim Tlidi, 2019. "On some k-scoring rules for committee elections: agreement and Condorcet Principle," Working Papers hal-02147735, HAL.
- Mostapha Diss & Eric Kamwa & Abdelmonaim Tlidi, 2020.
"On Some k -scoring Rules for Committee Elections: Agreement and Condorcet Principle,"
Revue d'économie politique, Dalloz, vol. 130(5), pages 699-725.
- Mostapha Diss & Eric Kamwa & Abdelmonaim Tlidi, 2020. "On some k-scoring rules for committee elections: agreement and Condorcet Principle," Post-Print hal-02147735, HAL.
- Daniela Bubboloni & Mostapha Diss & Michele Gori, 2020.
"Extensions of the Simpson voting rule to the committee selection setting,"
Public Choice, Springer, vol. 183(1), pages 151-185, April.
- Daniela Bubboloni & Mostapha Diss & Michele Gori, 2018. "Extensions of the Simpson voting rule to the committee selection setting," Working Papers 1813, Groupe d'Analyse et de Théorie Economique Lyon St-Étienne (GATE Lyon St-Étienne), Université de Lyon.
- Daniela Bubboloni & Mostapha Diss & Michele Gori, 2020. "Extensions of the Simpson voting rule to the committee selection setting," Post-Print hal-04419940, HAL.
- Daniela Bubboloni & Mostapha Diss & Michele Gori, 2018. "Extensions of the Simpson voting rule to the committee selection setting," Working Papers halshs-01827668, HAL.
- Daniela Bubboloni & Mostapha Diss & Michele Gori, 2020. "Extensions of the Simpson voting rule to the committee selection setting," Post-Print halshs-02393100, HAL.
- Diss, Mostapha & Mahajne, Muhammad, 2020.
"Social acceptability of Condorcet committees,"
Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 14-27.
- Mostapha Diss & Muhammad Mahajne, 2019. "Social Acceptability of Condorcet Committees," Working Papers halshs-02003292, HAL.
- Mostapha Diss & Muhammad Mahajne, 2019. "Social Acceptability of Condorcet Committees," Working Papers halshs-02011732, HAL.
- Mostapha Diss & Muhammad Mahajne, 2019. "Social Acceptability of Condorcet Committees," Working Papers 1906, Groupe d'Analyse et de Théorie Economique Lyon St-Étienne (GATE Lyon St-Étienne), Université de Lyon.
- Edith Elkind & Piotr Faliszewski & Piotr Skowron & Arkadii Slinko, 2017. "Properties of multiwinner voting rules," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 48(3), pages 599-632, March.
- Eric Kamwa, 2019.
"On the Likelihood of the Borda Effect: The Overall Probabilities for General Weighted Scoring Rules and Scoring Runoff Rules,"
Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 519-541, June.
- Eric Kamwa, 2019. "On the Likelihood of the Borda Effect: The Overall Probabilities for General Weighted Scoring Rules and Scoring Runoff Rules," Post-Print hal-01786590, HAL.
- Mostapha Diss & Ahmed Doghmi, 2016.
"Multi-winner scoring election methods: Condorcet consistency and paradoxes,"
Public Choice, Springer, vol. 169(1), pages 97-116, October.
- Mostapha Diss & Ahmed Doghmi, 2016. "Multi-winner scoring election methods: Condorcet consistency and paradoxes," Working Papers halshs-01285526, HAL.
- Mostapha Diss & Ahmed Doghmi, 2016. "Multi-winner scoring election methods: Condorcet consistency and paradoxes," Working Papers 1613, Groupe d'Analyse et de Théorie Economique Lyon St-Étienne (GATE Lyon St-Étienne), Université de Lyon.
- Mostapha Diss & Ahmed Doghmi, 2016. "Multi-winner scoring election methods: Condorcet consistency and paradoxes," Post-Print halshs-01381394, HAL.
- Mostapha Diss & Eric Kamwa & Issofa Moyouwou & Hatem Smaoui, 2021.
"Condorcet Efficiency of General Weighted Scoring Rules Under IAC: Indifference and Abstention,"
Studies in Choice and Welfare, in: Mostapha Diss & Vincent Merlin (ed.), Evaluating Voting Systems with Probability Models, pages 55-73,
Springer.
- Mostapha Diss & Issofa Moyouwou & Hatem Smaoui & Eric Kamwa, 2021. "Condorcet efficiency of general weighted scoring rules under IAC: indifference and abstention," Post-Print hal-02196387, HAL.
- Eric Kamwa, 2022.
"Scoring rules, ballot truncation, and the truncation paradox,"
Public Choice, Springer, vol. 192(1), pages 79-97, July.
- Eric Kamwa, 2022. "Scoring Rules, Ballot Truncation, and the Truncation Paradox," Post-Print hal-03632662, HAL.
- Mostapha Diss & Eric Kamwa & Issofa Moyouwou & Hatem Smaoui, 2019. "Condorcet efficiency of general weighted scoring rules under IAC: indifference and abstention," Working Papers hal-02196387, HAL.
- Eric Kamwa, 2022. "Scoring Rules, Ballot Truncation, and the Truncation Paradox," Working Papers hal-03632662, HAL.
- David McCune & Erin Martin & Grant Latina & Kaitlyn Simms, 2023. "A Comparison of Sequential Ranked-Choice Voting and Single Transferable Vote," Papers 2306.17341, arXiv.org.
- Eric Kamwa & Issofa Moyouwou, 2019. "Susceptibility to Manipulation by Sincere Truncation : the Case of Scoring Rules and Scoring Runoff Systems," Working Papers hal-02185965, HAL.
- Mostapha Diss & Eric Kamwa & Abdelmonaim Tlidi, 2018.
"A Note on the Likelihood of the Absolute Majority Paradoxes,"
Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 38(4), pages 1727-1734.
- Mostapha Diss & Eric Kamwa & Abdelmonaim Tlidi, 2018. "A Note on the Likelihood of the Absolute Majority Paradoxes," Post-Print hal-01896273, HAL.
- Eric Kamwa & Issofa Moyouwou, 2021.
"Susceptibility to Manipulation by Sincere Truncation: The Case of Scoring Rules and Scoring Runoff Systems,"
Studies in Choice and Welfare, in: Mostapha Diss & Vincent Merlin (ed.), Evaluating Voting Systems with Probability Models, pages 275-295,
Springer.
- Eric Kamwa & Issofa Moyouwou, 2021. "Susceptibility to Manipulation by Sincere Truncation : the Case of Scoring Rules and Scoring Runoff Systems," Post-Print hal-02185965, HAL.
- Mostapha Diss & Clinton Gubong Gassi & Issofa Moyouwou, 2023.
"Combining diversity and excellence in multi winner elections,"
Working Papers
2023-05, CRESE.
- Issofa Moyouwou & Mostapha Diss & Clinton Gubong Gassi, 2023. "Combining diversity and excellence in multiwinner elections," Working Papers halshs-04221668, HAL.
- Eric Kamwa, 2021. "To what extent does the model of processing sincereincomplete rankings affect the likelihood of the truncation paradox?," Working Papers hal-02879390, HAL.
- Fatma Aslan & Hayrullah Dindar & Jean Lainé, 2022.
"When are committees of Condorcet winners Condorcet winning committees?,"
Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 26(3), pages 417-446, September.
- Fatma Aslan & Hayrullah Dindar & Jean Lainé, 2021. "When are committees of Condorcet winners Condorcet winning committees?," Post-Print hal-03335584, HAL.
- Sylvain Béal & Marc Deschamps & Mostapha Diss & Issofa Moyouwou, 2022.
"Inconsistent weighting in weighted voting games,"
Public Choice, Springer, vol. 191(1), pages 75-103, April.
- Sylvain Béal & Marc Deschamps & Mostapha Diss & Issofa Moyouwou, 2021. "Inconsistent weighting in weighted voting games," Working Papers 2021-01, CRESE.
- Sylvain Béal & Marc Deschamps & Issofa Moyouwou & Mostapha Diss, 2022. "Inconsistent weighting in weighted voting games," Post-Print hal-04416052, HAL.
- Sylvain Béal & Marc Deschamps & Issofa Moyouwou & Mostapha Diss, 2021. "Inconsistent weighting in weighted voting games," Working Papers hal-04229250, HAL.
- Eric Kamwa, 2018. "On the Likelihood of the Borda Effect: The Overall Probabilities for General Weighted Scoring Rules and Scoring Runoff Rules," Working Papers hal-01786590, HAL.
More about this item
Keywords
Committee; Representativeness; Borda; Condorcet; Chamberlin-Courant; k-Scoring rule;All these keywords.
JEL classification:
- D71 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Social Choice; Clubs; Committees; Associations
- D72 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior
NEP fields
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:- NEP-POL-2018-06-25 (Positive Political Economics)
Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gat:wpaper:1812. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nelly Wirth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gateefr.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.