IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ekd/010027/10259.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Beyond Water Stress: Structural Adjustment and Macroeconomic Consequences of the Emerging Water Scarcity

Author

Listed:
  • Roberto Roson
  • Richard Damania

Abstract

Most studies assessing the aggregate water scarcity at the country or regional level are based on indices like per capita water availability or “water stress”, defined as a ratio between water demand (or consumption) and some measure of (sustainable) freshwater supply. Although these indices are useful indicators to highlight how severe the water scarcity problem may be in different areas, they say nothing about whether, how and how much the society can adjust to lower levels of water availability. By contrast, in a previous study (Roson and Damania, 2015), we found that scenarios of economic development that have been recently proposed to support the scientific analyses of climate change (the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways) have ignored water availability. The underlying assumptions of sustained economic growth, especially for developing countries, would imply an excessive consumption of water, even when substantial improvements in water efficiency are envisaged. This paper addresses the issue of assessing what changes in the economic structure, consumption patterns and trade flows would be induced by the emerging constraints on water availability, considering also the effects of water inter-industrial reallocation policies. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first contribution in the literature analyzing such macroeconomic, system-wide consequences of water scarcity. To this end, we identify three different ways through which a “potential excess demand for water” would be absorbed. First, water saving technologies and policies could be put in place, possibly accelerating an ongoing tendency of improved water efficiency. Technologies and policies could be costly, though, so their implementation would be justified only when the implicit (shadow) value of water gets sufficiently high. Ideally, the different options could be ranked in terms of economic efficiency, from the lowest to the highest unit cost, and those whose unit cost (possibly including external costs) falls below the shadow value of water (increasing as the water gets scarcer) should be selected. In practice, however, the technological response to the water stress is much more complicated, as a variety of factors (technical, political, institutional, safety, etc.) ultimately affects the choice among the different technology options. We therefore base our analysis on a qualitative index of technology potential for a number of potentially water-stressed macro-regions. Second, when actual water availability turns out to be lower than what would be required for production and consumption purposes, consumers’ utility diminishes and productivity in water-using industries declines. Even in the absence of a formal market for water resources, scarcity is transmitted as a price signal, and a structural adjustment (reallocating water using activities in time and space) takes place within the economic system, alleviating the overall impact of the negative shock for the economy. The same process leads to a semi-automatic, market driven improvement in the aggregate water efficiency or productivity (water per unit of output), whose magnitude – however – depends on a series of specific characteristics of the economic system under consideration. To capture this intra-regional water reallocation process, we thereby construct an index of “market flexibility”, on the basis of numerical simulation experiments. Finally, after improving water efficiency through technology, policy or market-mediated adjustment, some excess demand for water resources is likely to remain, meaning that the actual delivery or consumption of water will still fall short of the desired level. Cuts in water consumption, in turn, imply a diminished utilization of a key production factor for many industries, bringing about reduced production volumes and productivity. The ultimate impact on industrial productivity depends on the marginal product (in real terms) or on the marginal value (in value terms) of water. We estimate the marginal value of water for 15 industries and 14 world macro-regions, assuming a relationship between average and marginal value of water. That relationship relies on two parameters, which are calibrated on the basis of the findings of an econometric study conducted by Moolman, Blignaut and van Eyden (2006), who computed the marginal value of water for five categories of fruits in South Africa. We therefore employ a global computable general equilibrium model to carry out a set of numerical simulation experiments, proceeding as follows: 1. We project economic development scenarios based on Shared Socio-economic Pathways 1 and 3 for the years 2050 and 2100; 2. After estimating the industrial usage of water per unit of output and its evolution over time, we translate the projected industrial output into the corresponding potential demand for water, necessary to sustain the production level growth; 3. We compare such potential water demand (including direct municipal use) with an estimate of sustainable water consumption, by region, based on forecasts of water runoffs as obtained by a global hydrology model, developed at the University of Maryland, which also considers climate change impacts on water resources; 4. For those regions in which potential demand exceeds sustainable supply, we appraise how much of the gap can be covered trough enhanced water efficiency, realized by technological solutions and intra-regional reallocation of economic activities; 5. The remaining part is interpreted as cuts in water delivery. The cuts are applied at the industrial level, according to various policies. For instance, proportionally or by considering the relative economic returns on the industrial water usage; 6. The reduction of water availability at the industrial level is converted, through the corresponding marginal value of water, into reductions in industrial (multi-factor) productivity; 7. The changes in productivity are inserted as exogenous shocks in a global CGE model; 8. Results of the CGE model in terms of income, economic structure, trade flows and welfare are assessed, in order to highlight the macroeconomic implications of the emerging water scarcity and the relative effectiveness of the alternative policies of water allocation among different economic sectors. This study complements an earlier research on the same topic by explicitly introducing estimates of the marginal value of water, which are specific to industries and regions, as well as by allowing for a differentiated response in water stressed regions in terms of structural adjustment and technology implementation capability. A draft, with some missing sections, is available (uploaded).

Suggested Citation

  • Roberto Roson & Richard Damania, 2017. "Beyond Water Stress: Structural Adjustment and Macroeconomic Consequences of the Emerging Water Scarcity," EcoMod2017 10259, EcoMod.
  • Handle: RePEc:ekd:010027:10259
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ecomod.net/system/files/Roson_Beyond.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Reimer, Jeffrey J., 2012. "On the economics of virtual water trade," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 135-139.
    2. Roson, Roberto & Damania, Richard, 2017. "The macroeconomic impact of future water scarcity," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 1141-1162.
    3. Rosegrant, Mark W. & Cai, Ximing & Cline, Sarah A., 2002. "Global water outlook to 2025," Food policy reports 14, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    4. Roson, Roberto & Damania, Richard, 2016. "Simulating the Macroeconomic Impact of Future Water Scarcity an Assessment of Alternative Scenarios," Conference papers 332687, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    5. Roberto Roson & Richard Damania, the World Bank, Washington D.C., 2016. "Simulating the Macroeconomic Impact of Future Water Scarcity," EcoMod2016 9167, EcoMod.
    6. Hertel, Thomas, 1997. "Global Trade Analysis: Modeling and applications," GTAP Books, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, number 7685, December.
    7. Elmar Kriegler & Jae Edmonds & Stéphane Hallegatte & Kristie Ebi & Tom Kram & Keywan Riahi & Harald Winkler & Detlef Vuuren, 2014. "A new scenario framework for climate change research: the concept of shared climate policy assumptions," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 122(3), pages 401-414, February.
    8. Moolman, C.E. & Blignaut, J.N. & van Eyden, R., 2006. "Modelling the marginal revenue of water in selected agricultural commodities: A panel data approach," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 45(1), pages 1-11, March.
    9. Detlef Vuuren & Elmar Kriegler & Brian O’Neill & Kristie Ebi & Keywan Riahi & Timothy Carter & Jae Edmonds & Stephane Hallegatte & Tom Kram & Ritu Mathur & Harald Winkler, 2014. "A new scenario framework for Climate Change Research: scenario matrix architecture," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 122(3), pages 373-386, February.
    10. Brian O’Neill & Elmar Kriegler & Keywan Riahi & Kristie Ebi & Stephane Hallegatte & Timothy Carter & Ritu Mathur & Detlef Vuuren, 2014. "A new scenario framework for climate change research: the concept of shared socioeconomic pathways," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 122(3), pages 387-400, February.
    11. Kristie Ebi & Stephane Hallegatte & Tom Kram & Nigel Arnell & Timothy Carter & Jae Edmonds & Elmar Kriegler & Ritu Mathur & Brian O’Neill & Keywan Riahi & Harald Winkler & Detlef Vuuren & Timm Zwickel, 2014. "A new scenario framework for climate change research: background, process, and future directions," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 122(3), pages 363-372, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Delorit, Justin D. & Parker, Dominic P. & Block, Paul J., 2019. "An agro-economic approach to framing perennial farm-scale water resources demand management for water rights markets," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 68-81.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wolfgang Britz & Roberto Roson & Martina Sartori, 2019. "SSP Long Run Scenarios for European NUTS2 Regions," Working Papers 2019: 22, Department of Economics, University of Venice "Ca' Foscari".
    2. Roberto Roson & Dominique van der Mensbrugghe, 2017. "Assessing Long Run Structural Change in Multi-Sector General Equilibrium Models," EcoMod2017 10257, EcoMod.
    3. Wolfgang Britz & Roberto Roson, 2018. "Exploring Long Run Structural Change with a Dynamic General Equilibrium Model," Working Papers 2018: 12, Department of Economics, University of Venice "Ca' Foscari".
    4. Roson, Roberto & Damania, Richard, 2016. "Simulating the Macroeconomic Impact of Future Water Scarcity an Assessment of Alternative Scenarios," Conference papers 332687, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    5. Hans van Meijl & Petr Havlik & Hermann Lotze-Campen & Elke Stehfest & Peter Witzke & Ignacio Perez Dominguez & Benjamin Bodirsky & Michiel van Dijk & Jonathan Doelman & Thomas Fellmann & Florian Humpe, 2017. "Challenges of Global Agriculture in a Climate Change Context by 2050 (AgCLIM50)," JRC Research Reports JRC106835, Joint Research Centre.
    6. Gabriele Standardi, 2023. "Exploring market-driven adaptation to climate change in a general equilibrium global trade model," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 1-29, February.
    7. Standardi, Gabriele, 2017. "Endogenous technical change linked to international mobility of primary factors in climate change scenarios: global welfare implications using the GTAP model," Conference papers 332920, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    8. Cotterman, Turner, 2019. "Why Rapid and Deep Decarbonization isn’t Simple: Linking Bottom-up Socio-technical Decision-making Insights with Top-down Macroeconomic Analyses," Conference papers 333088, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    9. Zuzana Smeets Kristkova & Michiel van Dijk & Hans van Meijl, 2015. "Long-term projections of global food security with R&D-driven technological progress," EcoMod2015 8601, EcoMod.
    10. Boysen-Urban, Kirsten & Philippidis, George & M'barek, Robert & Ferrari, Emanuele, 2021. "Impacts of Changes Towards More Sustainable Food Production and Consumption at the Global Level," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315275, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    11. Lamperti, Francesco & Bosetti, Valentina & Roventini, Andrea & Tavoni, Massimo & Treibich, Tania, 2021. "Three green financial policies to address climate risks," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    12. Solberg, Birger & Moiseyev, Alex & Hansen, Jon Øvrum & Horn, Svein Jarle & Øverland, Margareth, 2021. "Wood for food: Economic impacts of sustainable use of forest biomass for salmon feed production in Norway," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    13. Lanzi, Elisa & Dellink, Rob & Chateau, Jean, 2018. "The sectoral and regional economic consequences of outdoor air pollution to 2060," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 89-113.
    14. Speers, Ann E. & Besedin, Elena Y. & Palardy, James E. & Moore, Chris, 2016. "Impacts of climate change and ocean acidification on coral reef fisheries: An integrated ecological–economic model," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 33-43.
    15. Kalkuhl, Matthias & Wenz, Leonie, 2020. "The impact of climate conditions on economic production. Evidence from a global panel of regions," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    16. McManamay, Ryan A. & DeRolph, Christopher R. & Surendran-Nair, Sujithkumar & Allen-Dumas, Melissa, 2019. "Spatially explicit land-energy-water future scenarios for cities: Guiding infrastructure transitions for urban sustainability," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 880-900.
    17. Richard Taylor & Ruth Butterfield & Tiago Capela Lourenço & Adis Dzebo & Henrik Carlsen & Richard J. T. Klein, 2020. "Surveying perceptions and practices of high-end climate change," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 161(1), pages 65-87, July.
    18. Phetheet, Jirapat & Hill, Mary C. & Barron, Robert W. & Gray, Benjamin J. & Wu, Hongyu & Amanor-Boadu, Vincent & Heger, Wade & Kisekka, Isaya & Golden, Bill & Rossi, Matthew W., 2021. "Relating agriculture, energy, and water decisions to farm incomes and climate projections using two freeware programs, FEWCalc and DSSAT," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    19. Milan Ščasný & Emanuele Massetti & Jan Melichar & Samuel Carrara, 2015. "Quantifying the Ancillary Benefits of the Representative Concentration Pathways on Air Quality in Europe," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 62(2), pages 383-415, October.
    20. Enrica De Cian & Ian Sue Wing, 2016. "Global Energy Demand in a Warming Climate," Working Papers 2016.16, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Global; Agent-based modeling; Agent-based modeling;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F00 - International Economics - - General - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ekd:010027:10259. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Theresa Leary (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ecomoea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.