IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehs/wpaper/18009.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Labour contract auctions in 19th-century Cornish tin mining

Author

Listed:
  • Tim Barmby

    (Newcastle University)

Abstract

"This paper considers the organisation of labour in the Cornish Tin mining industry in the 19 uses primary records of labour bargains made at Wheal Hearle mine near St Just in the early 1860s. One of the main points of interest is that these bargains were allocated by auction on a monthly basis. The work was of two types, “tutwork” and “tribute”, tutwork was work involved in digging levels, shafts etc within the mine whereas tribute was the payment for the raising of ore. Tutwork would usually be a rate per fathom dug, Tribute a sort of revenue share, were the group of miners would get so many shillings in the pound (value) of the tin ore. The paper will examine the relative variability of pay for the two types of work and the extent to which miners would switch between the two types of work. The paper will also consider further implications of these arrangements, using data to examine the extent to which miners were able to use knowledge (of geology) to make good decisions on which bargains to bid for. It will do this by examining the structure of the distribution of earnings, and the extent to which groups of miners were able to earn persistently above the mean."

Suggested Citation

  • Tim Barmby, 2018. "Labour contract auctions in 19th-century Cornish tin mining," Working Papers 18009, Economic History Society.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehs:wpaper:18009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ehs.org.uk/dotAsset/66a51e02-68fb-4552-b6e8-185e88a243bf.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • N00 - Economic History - - General - - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehs:wpaper:18009. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chair Public Engagement Committe (currently David Higgins - Newcastle) (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ehsukea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.