IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cte/wsrepe/ws131514.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A new distance for data sets (and probability measures) in a RKHS context

Author

Listed:
  • Martos, Gabriel

Abstract

In this paper we define distance functions for data sets (and distributions) in a RKHS context. To this aim we introduce kernels for data sets that provide a metrization of the set of points sets (the power set). An interesting point in the proposed kernel distance is that it takes into account the underlying (data) generating probability distributions. In particular, we propose kernel distances that rely on the estimation of density level sets of the underlying distribution, and can be extended from data sets to probability measures. The performance of the proposed distances is tested on a variety of simulated distributions plus a couple of real pattern recognition problems

Suggested Citation

  • Martos, Gabriel, 2013. "A new distance for data sets (and probability measures) in a RKHS context," DES - Working Papers. Statistics and Econometrics. WS ws131514, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Estadística.
    • Handle: RePEc:cte:wsrepe:ws131514
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://e-archivo.uc3m.es/rest/api/core/bitstreams/3304c93c-01ba-4ebd-b67f-a3825c66496a/content
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alison L. Gibbs & Francis Edward Su, 2002. "On Choosing and Bounding Probability Metrics," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 70(3), pages 419-435, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Oyama, Daisuke & Tercieux, Olivier, 2012. "On the strategic impact of an event under non-common priors," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 74(1), pages 321-331.
    2. Crimaldi, Irene & Dai Pra, Paolo & Minelli, Ida Germana, 2016. "Fluctuation theorems for synchronization of interacting Pólya’s urns," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 126(3), pages 930-947.
    3. Fenner, Trevor & Levene, Mark & Loizou, George, 2010. "Predicting the long tail of book sales: Unearthing the power-law exponent," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 389(12), pages 2416-2421.
    4. Takashi Kamihigashi & John Stachurski, 2017. "Some Unified Results for Classical and Monotone Markov Chain Theory," Discussion Paper Series DP2017-02, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University.
    5. Bertanha, Marinho & Moreira, Marcelo J., 2020. "Impossible inference in econometrics: Theory and applications," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 218(2), pages 247-270.
    6. HAEDO, Christian & MOUCHART, Michel, 2012. "A stochastic independence approach for different measures of concentration and specialization," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2012025, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    7. Schneider, Judith C. & Schweizer, Nikolaus, 2015. "Robust measurement of (heavy-tailed) risks: Theory and implementation," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 183-203.
    8. Gerhold, Stefan & Gülüm, I. Cetin, 2019. "Peacocks nearby: Approximating sequences of measures," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 129(7), pages 2406-2436.
    9. Xuejun Zhao & Ruihao Zhu & William B. Haskell, 2022. "Learning to Price Supply Chain Contracts against a Learning Retailer," Papers 2211.04586, arXiv.org.
    10. Borgonovo, E. & Zentner, I. & Pellegri, A. & Tarantola, S. & de Rocquigny, E., 2013. "On the importance of uncertain factors in seismic fragility assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 66-76.
    11. Gurdip Bakshi & Xiaohui Gao & George Panayotov, 2021. "A Theory of Dissimilarity Between Stochastic Discount Factors," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(7), pages 4602-4622, July.
    12. Puppo, L. & Pedroni, N. & Maio, F. Di & Bersano, A. & Bertani, C. & Zio, E., 2021. "A Framework based on Finite Mixture Models and Adaptive Kriging for Characterizing Non-Smooth and Multimodal Failure Regions in a Nuclear Passive Safety System," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    13. Leskelä, Lasse & Vihola, Matti, 2013. "Stochastic order characterization of uniform integrability and tightness," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 83(1), pages 382-389.
    14. Marie Ernst & Yvik Swan, 2022. "Distances Between Distributions Via Stein’s Method," Journal of Theoretical Probability, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 949-987, June.
    15. Crimaldi, Irene & Dai Pra, Paolo & Louis, Pierre-Yves & Minelli, Ida G., 2019. "Synchronization and functional central limit theorems for interacting reinforced random walks," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 129(1), pages 70-101.
    16. Francisco de A. T. Carvalho & Antonio Irpino & Rosanna Verde & Antonio Balzanella, 2022. "Batch Self-Organizing Maps for Distributional Data with an Automatic Weighting of Variables and Components," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 39(2), pages 343-375, July.
    17. Francesco Di Maio & Nicola Pedroni & Barnabás Tóth & Luciano Burgazzi & Enrico Zio, 2021. "Reliability Assessment of Passive Safety Systems for Nuclear Energy Applications: State-of-the-Art and Open Issues," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-17, August.
    18. Arno Berger & Chuang Xu, 2020. "Asymptotics of One-Dimensional Lévy Approximations," Journal of Theoretical Probability, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 1164-1195, June.
    19. Arno Berger & Chuang Xu, 2019. "Best Finite Approximations of Benford’s Law," Journal of Theoretical Probability, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 1525-1553, September.
    20. Lijun Cheng & Pratik Karkhanis & Birkan Gokbag & Yueze Liu & Lang Li, 2022. "DGCyTOF: Deep learning with graphic cluster visualization to predict cell types of single cell mass cytometry data," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(4), pages 1-22, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Probability measures;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cte:wsrepe:ws131514. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ana Poveda (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://portal.uc3m.es/portal/page/portal/dpto_estadistica .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.