IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cda/wpaper/195.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Does Egalitarianism Have a Future?

Author

Listed:
  • Giacomo Bonanno
  • John Roemer
  • Wen Hai
  • Shunli Yao
  • Louis Putterman

    (Department of Economics, University of California Davis)

Abstract

This paper surveys the evidence, theoretical and empirical, relating to the possibility of achieving more egalitarian distributions of income than are typical in modern societies. The first four parts of the paper (Introduction, Improving efficiency an equality, The ownership of firms, and Taxation) are mainly concerned with the probably extent of the equality-efficiency trade-off, where the instruments that could be used to effect an increase in equality are property rights in firms and taxation (personal income, profit, and wealth). The fifth part (The political economy of equality) discusses the political feasibility of effecting redistribution, and in particular, why redistribution has not been more dramatic in democracies.""

Suggested Citation

  • Giacomo Bonanno & John Roemer & Wen Hai & Shunli Yao & Louis Putterman, 2003. "Does Egalitarianism Have a Future?," Working Papers 195, University of California, Davis, Department of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:cda:wpaper:195
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repec.dss.ucdavis.edu/files/qRaJxBF8HpqoWnqjDKgsCRpZ/96-9.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cda:wpaper:195. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Letters and Science IT Services Unit (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/educdus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.