IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2002.05785.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Economic complexity of prefectures in Japan

Author

Listed:
  • Abhijit Chakraborty
  • Hiroyasu Inoue
  • Yoshi Fujiwara

Abstract

Every nation prioritizes the inclusive economic growth and development of all regions. However, we observe that economic activities are clustered in space, which results in a disparity in per-capita income among different regions. A complexity-based method was proposed by Hidalgo and Hausmann [PNAS 106, 10570-10575 (2009)] to explain the large gaps in per-capita income across countries. Although there have been extensive studies on countries' economic complexity using international export data, studies on economic complexity at the regional level are relatively less studied. Here, we study the industrial sector complexity of prefectures in Japan based on the basic information of more than one million firms. We aggregate the data as a bipartite network of prefectures and industrial sectors. We decompose the bipartite network as a prefecture-prefecture network and sector-sector network, which reveals the relationships among them. Similarities among the prefectures and among the sectors are measured using a metric. From these similarity matrices, we cluster the prefectures and sectors using the minimal spanning tree technique.The computed economic complexity index from the structure of the bipartite network shows a high correlation with macroeconomic indicators, such as per-capita gross prefectural product and prefectural income per person. We argue that this index reflects the present economic performance and hidden potential of the prefectures for future growth.

Suggested Citation

  • Abhijit Chakraborty & Hiroyasu Inoue & Yoshi Fujiwara, 2020. "Economic complexity of prefectures in Japan," Papers 2002.05785, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2020.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2002.05785
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2002.05785
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abhijit Chakraborty & Yuichi Kichikawa & Takashi Iino & Hiroshi Iyetomi & Hiroyasu Inoue & Yoshi Fujiwara & Hideaki Aoyama, 2018. "Hierarchical communities in the walnut structure of the Japanese production network," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-25, August.
    2. Hausmann, Ricardo & Hidalgo, Cesar, 2014. "The Atlas of Economic Complexity: Mapping Paths to Prosperity," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262525429, April.
    3. Manuel Sebastian Mariani & Alexandre Vidmer & Matus Medo & Yi-Cheng Zhang, 2015. "Measuring economic complexity of countries and products: which metric to use?," Papers 1509.01482, arXiv.org.
    4. Zoran Utkovski & Melanie F Pradier & Viktor Stojkoski & Fernando Perez-Cruz & Ljupco Kocarev, 2018. "Economic complexity unfolded: Interpretable model for the productive structure of economies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-24, August.
    5. Hazem Krichene & Abhijit Chakraborty & Hiroyasu Inoue & Yoshi Fujiwara, 2017. "Business cycles’ correlation and systemic risk of the Japanese supplier-customer network," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(10), pages 1-22, October.
    6. Kemp-Benedict, Eric, 2014. "An interpretation and critique of the Method of Reflections," MPRA Paper 60705, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Chakraborty, Abhijit & Krichene, Hazem & Inoue, Hiroyasu & Fujiwara, Yoshi, 2019. "Characterization of the community structure in a large-scale production network in Japan," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 513(C), pages 210-221.
    8. Abhijit Chakraborty & Hazem Krichene & Hiroyasu Inoue & Yoshi Fujiwara, 2019. "Exponential random graph models for the Japanese bipartite network of banks and firms," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 2(1), pages 3-13, January.
    9. Manuel Mariani & Alexandre Vidmer & Matsúš Medo & Yi-Cheng Zhang, 2015. "Measuring economic complexity of countries and products: which metric to use?," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 88(11), pages 1-9, November.
    10. Antonios Garas & Celine Rozenblat & Frank Schweitzer, 2015. "The network structure of city-firm relations," Papers 1512.02859, arXiv.org.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ibrahim Tuğrul Çınar & Ilhan Korkmaz & Tüzin Baycan, 2022. "Regions’ economic fitness and sectoral labor productivity: Evidence from Turkey," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(3), pages 575-598, June.
    2. Gómez-Zaldívar, Manuel & Gómez-Zaldívar, Fernando & Carrillo Ramírez, José Luis, 2024. "Cálculo de los Índices de Complejidad en México: Propuesta para una estimación más periódica y robusta," INVESTIGACIONES REGIONALES - Journal of REGIONAL RESEARCH, Asociación Española de Ciencia Regional, issue 59, pages 213-228.
    3. Huseyin OZTURK & YASUDA Yukihiro, 2021. "We Are Alike: Capital Structure of Japanese SMEs Across Prefectures," Discussion papers 21092, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abhijit Chakraborty & Hiroyasu Inoue & Yoshi Fujiwara, 2020. "Economic complexity of prefectures in Japan," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-13, August.
    2. Emilie Sophie Le Caous & Fenghueih Huarng, 2021. "Economic Complexity and Human Development: Moderated by Logistics and International Migration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-23, February.
    3. Penny Mealy & J. Doyne Farmer & Alexander Teytelboym, 2017. "Interpreting Economic Complexity," Papers 1711.08245, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2018.
    4. Emilie Le Caous & Fenghueih Huarng, 2020. "Economic Complexity and the Mediating Effects of Income Inequality: Reaching Sustainable Development in Developing Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-26, March.
    5. Farmer, J. Doyne & Mealy, Penny & Teytelboym, Alexander, 2018. "A New Interpretation of the Economic Complexity Index," INET Oxford Working Papers 2018-04, Institute for New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford.
    6. Diogo Ferraz & Fernanda P. S. Falguera & Enzo B. Mariano & Dominik Hartmann, 2021. "Linking Economic Complexity, Diversification, and Industrial Policy with Sustainable Development: A Structured Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-29, January.
    7. Viktor Stojkoski & Zoran Utkovski & Ljupco Kocarev, 2016. "The Impact of Services on Economic Complexity: Service Sophistication as Route for Economic Growth," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-29, August.
    8. Abhijit Chakraborty & Yuichi Kichikawa & Takashi Iino & Hiroshi Iyetomi & Hiroyasu Inoue & Yoshi Fujiwara & Hideaki Aoyama, 2018. "Hierarchical communities in the walnut structure of the Japanese production network," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-25, August.
    9. Canh Phuc Nguyen & Christophe Schinckus & Thanh Dinh Su, 2020. "The drivers of economic complexity: International evidence from financial development and patents," International Economics, CEPII research center, issue 164, pages 140-150.
    10. Cem Çağrı Dönmez & Abdulkadir Atalan, 2019. "Developing Statistical Optimization Models for Urban Competitiveness Index: Under the Boundaries of Econophysics Approach," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-11, November.
    11. Chu, Lan Khanh & Hoang, Dung Phuong, 2020. "How does economic complexity influence income inequality? New evidence from international data," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 44-57.
    12. Jian Gao & Tao Zhou, 2017. "Quantifying China's Regional Economic Complexity," Papers 1703.01292, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2017.
    13. Hao Liao & Alexandre Vidmer, 2018. "A Comparative Analysis of the Predictive Abilities of Economic Complexity Metrics Using International Trade Network," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-12, February.
    14. Wang, Feng & Wu, Min & Wang, Jingcao, 2023. "Can increasing economic complexity improve China's green development efficiency?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    15. Dung Phuong Hoang & Lan Khanh Chu, 2023. "Progression to Higher Economic Complexity: The Role of Institutions," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 14(4), pages 4339-4366, December.
    16. Ming-Yang Zhou & Xiao-Yu Li & Wen-Man Xiong & Hao Liao, 2018. "Quantifying the Robustness of Countries’ Competitiveness by Network-Based Methods," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-10, December.
    17. Shahzad, Umer & Madaleno, Mara & Dagar, Vishal & Ghosh, Sudeshna & Doğan, Buhari, 2022. "Exploring the role of export product quality and economic complexity for economic progress of developed economies: Does institutional quality matter?," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 40-51.
    18. Zoran Utkovski & Melanie F Pradier & Viktor Stojkoski & Fernando Perez-Cruz & Ljupco Kocarev, 2018. "Economic complexity unfolded: Interpretable model for the productive structure of economies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-24, August.
    19. Ha, Le Thanh & Dung, Hoang Phuong & Thanh, To Trung, 2021. "Economic complexity and shadow economy: A multi-dimensional analysis," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 408-422.
    20. Hoang, Dung Phuong & Chu, Lan Khanh & To, Trung Thanh, 2023. "How do economic policy uncertainty, geopolitical risk, and natural resources rents affect economic complexity? Evidence from advanced and emerging market economies," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PA).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2002.05785. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.