IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/ubzefd/18769.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Do Democracy And Press Freedom Reduce Corruption? Evidence From A Cross Country Study

Author

Listed:
  • Chowdhury, Shyamal K.

Abstract

This paper calls attention to the instrumental role of democracy and press freedom in combating corruption. As opposed to an autocracy with no or limited press freedom, a free press in a democracy can inform voters about the corruption of political representatives, and voters in turn can punish incumbents by electing opposition parties. The empirical investigation carried out in this paper shows that democracy and press freedom can have significant impact on corruption. Though corruption may persist in the short- to medium-run, an increase in voters' participation and press freedom can reduce corruption.

Suggested Citation

  • Chowdhury, Shyamal K., 2004. "Do Democracy And Press Freedom Reduce Corruption? Evidence From A Cross Country Study," Discussion Papers 18769, University of Bonn, Center for Development Research (ZEF).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ubzefd:18769
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.18769
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/18769/files/dp040085.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.18769?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stephanie Lu Wang & Dan Li, 2019. "Responding to public disclosure of corporate social irresponsibility in host countries: Information control and ownership control," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 50(8), pages 1283-1309, October.
    2. Vu M. Ngo & Toan L. D. Huynh & Phuc V. Nguyen & Huan H. Nguyen, 2022. "Public sentiment towards economic sanctions in the Russia–Ukraine war," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 69(5), pages 564-573, November.
    3. Chen Chen & Michelle Song & Cameron Truong & Jin Zhang, 2024. "Naming as business strategy: an analysis of eponymy and debt contracting," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 2971-3017, September.
    4. Méon, Pierre-Guillaume & Sekkat, Khalid, 2022. "A time to throw stones, a time to reap: how long does it take for democratic transitions to improve institutional outcomes?," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(3), pages 429-443, June.
    5. Roxana Gutiérrez-Romero & Luciana Méndez-Errico, 2017. "Does Inequality Foster or Hinder the Growth of Entrepreneurship in the Long Run?," Research on Economic Inequality, in: Research on Economic Inequality, volume 25, pages 299-341, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    6. Tran, My Thi Ha, 2021. "Public Sector Management And Corruption In Asean Plus Six," OSF Preprints stxw4, Center for Open Science.
    7. Laarni Escresa & Lucio Picci, 2020. "The determinants of cross-border corruption," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 184(3), pages 351-378, September.
    8. Budsaratragoon, Pornanong & Jitmaneeroj, Boonlert, 2020. "A critique on the Corruption Perceptions Index: An interdisciplinary approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    9. Dutta, Nabamita & Roy, Sanjukta, 2016. "The interactive impact of press freedom and media reach on corruption," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 227-236.
    10. Christopher L. Ambrey & Christopher M. Fleming & Matthew Manning & Christine Smith, 2016. "On the Confluence of Freedom of the Press, Control of Corruption and Societal Welfare," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 128(2), pages 859-880, September.
    11. Sylvain B. Ngassam & Simplice Asongu & Gildas T. Ngueleweu, 2023. "Social media use for offline political action (OPA) and corruption in Africa: impacts and transmission channels," Working Papers of the African Governance and Development Institute. 23/059, African Governance and Development Institute..
    12. Emmanuel Yeboah-Assiamah, 2017. "‘Strong Personalities’ and ‘Strong Institutions’ Mediated by a ‘Strong Third Force’: Thinking ‘Systems’ in Corruption Control," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 545-562, December.
    13. Uwe Sunde, 2006. "Wirtschaftliche Entwicklung und Demokratie – Ist Demokratie ein Wohlstandsmotor oder ein Wohlstandsprodukt?," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 7(4), pages 471-499, November.
    14. Karl Z. Meyer & John M. Luiz & Johannes W. Fedderke, 2024. "Rules of the Game and Credibility of Implementation in the Control of Corruption," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 194(1), pages 145-163, September.
    15. Chandrasekhar Krishnamurti & Domenico Pensiero & Eswaran Velayutham, 2019. "Determinants Of Defence Industry Corruption Risk: Firm Level Empirical Evidence Using Transparency International’S Anti-Corruption Index," The Singapore Economic Review (SER), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 64(03), pages 675-708, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Political Economy;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ubzefd:18769. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zefbnde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.