IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/pugtwp/331557.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Simulating trade policy reforms at the detailed level: some practical solutions

Author

Listed:
  • Gohin, Alexandre
  • Laborde, David

Abstract

Complex trade policies, mixing different tools applied at heterogeneous level on specific products, are not compatible with abrupt quantitative economic models. The present paper proposes a pragmatic modelling solution for solving this issue. It allows to use the most disaggregated information available i.e. trade and protection data in a standard framework, here the GTAP model and database. On the theoretical aspect, we open the black box of the standard Armington approach applied in an aggregated framework. We separate the bundle effect of an aggregated trade flow composed of different specific products (such as different HS6 lines), and the real geographical specificities of varieties. Moreover, we look at the issue of zero-trade flows that are usually badly treated in CGE models. Using GTAPAgr model, we apply our disaggregation strategy to the dairy sector with a simple and illustrative case with two sub-products. The role of taking into account heterogeneous structure of trade and protection and the possibility of exclusion of some producers, i.e. trade flows going to zero, is demonstrated.

Suggested Citation

  • Gohin, Alexandre & Laborde, David, 2006. "Simulating trade policy reforms at the detailed level: some practical solutions," Conference papers 331557, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:331557
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/331557/files/2620.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marco Missaglia & Paul de Boer, 2004. "Food-For-Work versus Cash-For-Work: Emergency Assistance in Palestine," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(4), pages 367-390.
    2. Paul de Boer & Bjarne S. Jensen, 2005. "The Expenditure System of CDES Indirect Utility Functions," DEGIT Conference Papers c010_036, DEGIT, Dynamics, Economic Growth, and International Trade.
    3. Somermeyer, W. H. & Langhout, A., 1972. "Shapes of Engel curves and demand curves: Implications of the expenditure allocation model, applied to Dutch data," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 3(3), pages 351-386, November.
    4. de Boer, P.M.C. & Missaglia, M., 2005. "Introducing the indirect addilog system in a computable general equilibrium model: a case study for Palestine," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2005-25, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. de Boer, P.M.C. & Missaglia, M., 2006. "Estimation of income elasticities and their use in a CGE model in Palestine," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2006-12, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    2. de Boer, P.M.C., 2009. "Modeling household behavior in a CGE model: linear expenditure system or indirect addilog?," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2009-16, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    3. de Boer, P.M.C. & Brocker, J. & Jensen, B.S. & van Daal, J., 2006. "Theoretical restrictions on the parameters of the indirect addilog system revisited," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2006-11, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    4. Paul De Boer & Richard Paap, 2009. "Testing non‐nested demand relations: linear expenditure system versus indirect addilog," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 63(3), pages 368-384, August.
    5. de Boer, P.M.C. & Missaglia, M., 2005. "Introducing the indirect addilog system in a computable general equilibrium model: a case study for Palestine," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2005-25, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    6. E.A. Selvanathan, 1987. "The Economic Theory of the Consumer," Economics Discussion / Working Papers 87-05, The University of Western Australia, Department of Economics.
    7. Bjarne Jensen & Paul Boer & Jan Daal & Peter Jensen, 2011. "Global restrictions on the parameters of the CDES indirect utility function," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 102(3), pages 217-235, April.
    8. Denis Conniffe, 2006. "Indirect addilog translation of indirect utility functions," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(4), pages 1388-1397, November.
    9. Bjarne S. Jensen, 2004. "Pareto Efficiency, Relative Prices, and Solutions to CGE Models," DEGIT Conference Papers c009_006, DEGIT, Dynamics, Economic Growth, and International Trade.
    10. Withey, P. & Lantz, V.A. & Ochuodho, T. & Patriquin, M.N. & Wilson, J. & Kennedy, M., 2018. "Economic impacts of conservation area strategies in Alberta, Canada: A CGE model analysis," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 33-40.
    11. Paul de Boer & Marco Missaglia, 2006. "Economic consequences of intifada," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 97-106.
    12. Hakeem Eltalla, 2013. "Devaluation and Output Growth in Palestine: Evidence from a CGE model," European Journal of Business and Economics, Central Bohemia University, vol. 8(4), pages 4221:8-4221, May.
    13. Bjarne S. Jensen & Mogens E. Larsen, 2005. "General Equilibrium Dynamics of Multi-Sector Growth Models," DEGIT Conference Papers c010_003, DEGIT, Dynamics, Economic Growth, and International Trade.
    14. de Boer, P.M.C., 2008. "Lack of peaceful resolution with Israel: economic cost for Palestinians," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2008-23, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    15. Donald C. Keenan & Taewon Kim, 2022. "Closing the invisible hand: a rehabilitation of tâtonnement dynamics," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 17(3), pages 681-711, July.
    16. van Daal, J. & Louter, A. S., 1979. "A QUADRATIC ENGEL CURVE DEMAND MODEL (squaring with the representative consumer)," Econometric Institute Archives 272179, Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    17. Bewley, Ronald A., 1987. "The Demand For Milk In Australia Estimation Of Price And Income Effects From The 1984 Household Expenditure Survey," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 31(3), pages 1-15, December.
    18. Paul de Boer & Bjarne S. Jensen, 2005. "The Expenditure System of CDES Indirect Utility Functions," DEGIT Conference Papers c010_036, DEGIT, Dynamics, Economic Growth, and International Trade.
    19. Missaglia, Marco & Valensisi, Giovanni, 2014. "Trade policy in Palestine: A reassessment," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 899-923.
    20. Denis Conniffe, 2004. "Generalised Translation of Indirect Utility Functions," Economics Department Working Paper Series n1390804, Department of Economics, National University of Ireland - Maynooth.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:331557. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gtpurus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.