Author
Abstract
Some agricultural project analysts advocate that "small-scale" perimeters are more cost effective and successful than large ones. Patterson argues that the small scale perimeter if potentially conducive to development because of their smallness and their flexibility in terms of innovations. Morever a recent survey irrigation in the Sahelian countries by Stryker, Gotsch, McIntire and Roche, suggests that labor intensive schemes generally have better distributional characteristics than those that are more capital intensive. These advantages attributed to the small schemes have even biased some donors towards funding small scale perimeters. Efforts to expand rice production and therefore to increase self-sufficiency can be analyzed in terms of their contributions to the three fundamental economic objectives: increased national incomes, more even income distribution, and increased food self-sufficiency. In the case of Mauritania, the main objective is to increase food self-sufficiency. As a Resources Assessment Manpower report (RAMS) stated, after 10 years of drought, loss of livestock and an increasing rate of food deficit, expanding irrigation is no longer an alternative, but an obligation. This study will 1) compare rice production costs in the large and small scale perimeters in the upstream zone of the Fleuve in Mauritania, 2) highlight the advantages and disadvantages of the large and small scale perimeters, and 3) draw some policy recommendations for future land development. While the Mauritanian government has used irrigation since 1973 to increase food security, the cost has been substantial. Related issues that will be explored relate to Mauritania's comparative advantage in rice production. Is locally produced rice competitive with the imported rice? For example, rice produced and consumed in the same zone may be competitive with imported rice delivered to this zone. Finally, this study analyzes rice policies used by the Mauritanian government to increase real rural incomes. In particular, are existing incentives adequate to motivate farmers to continue to produce under the current rice policies? Incentives to guide and reward farmers are critical component as once there are investment opportunities and efficient incentives, farmers will turn sand into gold.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Martin, Frederic & Lariviere, Sylvain & Staatz, John M., 1995.
"Success Stories of Adjustment: Results and Lessons from Africa and Latin America,"
1994 Conference, August 22-29, 1994, Harare, Zimbabwe
183385, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:midagr:11178. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/damsuus.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.