IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/gewi18/275847.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Der Einfluss Von Flächenkonzentration Und -Disparität Auf Die Bodenrichtwerte Von Ackerflächen – Thüringen, Rheinland-Pfalz Und Nordrhein-Westfalen Im Vergleich

Author

Listed:
  • Back, Hans
  • Lehn , Friederike
  • Bahrs, Enno

Abstract

Steigende Bodenpreise, vermehrte Aktivitäten nichtlandwirtschaftlicher Investoren und der allgemeine Strukturwandel werden als Gründe für die Notwendigkeit eines stärkeren Eingreifens des Staates in den Bodenmarkt genannt und sollen in einigen Bundesländern in Zukunft durch ein verschärftes Grundstückverkehrsrecht begrenzt werden. Zu den geplanten Maßnahmen zählen auch Zugangsbeschränkungen für Kauf- und Pachtinteressenten mit bereits überdurchschnittlich hohen Marktanteilen in regionalen Bodenmärkten. In diesem Beitrag untersuchen wir, wie Disparität und Konzentration der Flächenbewirtschaftung zusammen mit weiteren Einflussfaktoren auf die Bodenrichtwerte für Ackerland wirken, um daraus Empfehlungen für agrar- bzw. bodenpolitische Maßnahmen abzuleiten. Dabei berücksichtigen wir räumliche Autokorrelationen in einem hedonischen Preismodell auf Ebene der Gemeinden. Trotz unterschiedlichem Niveau der Flächenkonzentration bestätigt sich deren negativer Einfluss auf den Bodenrichtwert für die Bundesländer Thüringen, Rheinland-Pfalz und Nordrhein-Westfalen. Die Ergebnisse legen nahe, dass größere landwirtschaftliche Unternehmen ihre Nachfragemacht nutzen können, um niedrigere Preise durchzusetzen (Oligopson). Die durchschnittlich kleineren landwirtschaftlichen Unternehmen und höhere Preise relativieren in Rheinland-Pfalz und Nordrhein-Westfalen jedoch die Bedeutung von Konzentration im Vergleich zur Situation in Thüringen. Konzentration ist mit hedonischen Preismodellen nachweisbar und führt zu (politisch erwünschten) gedämpften Preissteigerungen. Allerdings kann sie wettbewerbsrechtlichen Zielsetzungen widersprechen. Eine Berücksichtigung von Marktmacht im Rahmen veränderter Bodenmarktregulierungen kann sinnvoll sein. Allerdings bleibt fraglich, ob landesweit einheitlich formulierte Regelungen für alle Regionen sinnvoll sind.

Suggested Citation

  • Back, Hans & Lehn , Friederike & Bahrs, Enno, 2018. "Der Einfluss Von Flächenkonzentration Und -Disparität Auf Die Bodenrichtwerte Von Ackerflächen – Thüringen, Rheinland-Pfalz Und Nordrhein-Westfalen Im Vergleich," 58th Annual Conference, Kiel, Germany, September 12-14, 2018 275847, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:gewi18:275847
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.275847
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/275847/files/Vortrag_151.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.275847?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Geerte Cotteleer & Cornelis Gardebroek & Jan Luijt, 2008. "Market Power in a GIS-Based Hedonic Price Model of Local Farmland Markets," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 84(4), pages 573-592.
    2. Kelejian, Harry H. & Prucha, Ingmar R., 2010. "Specification and estimation of spatial autoregressive models with autoregressive and heteroskedastic disturbances," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 157(1), pages 53-67, July.
    3. Margarian, Anne, 2008. "Sind die Pachten im Osten zu niedrig oder im Westen zu hoch?," Arbeitsberichte aus der vTI-Agrarökonomie 01/2008, Johann Heinrich von Thünen Institute, Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries.
    4. Tietz, Andreas, 2017. "Überregional aktive Kapitaleigentümer in ostdeutschen Agrarunternehmen: Entwicklungen bis 2017," Thünen Reports 52, Johann Heinrich von Thünen Institute, Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries.
    5. Habermann, Hendrik & Breustedt, Gunnar, 2011. "Einfluss der Biogaserzeugung auf landwirtschaftliche Pachtpreise in Deutschland," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 60(02), pages 1-16, May.
    6. Tietz, Andreas, 2017. "Überregional aktive Kapitaleigentümer in ostdeutschen Agrarunternehmen: Entwicklungen bis 2017," Thünen Report 265014, Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut (vTI), Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries.
    7. Gunnar Breustedt & Hendrik Habermann, 2011. "The Incidence of EU Per‐Hectare Payments on Farmland Rental Rates: A Spatial Econometric Analysis of German Farm‐Level Data," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(1), pages 225-243, February.
    8. Hüttel, S. & Wildermann, L., 2015. "Price formation in agricultural land markets – how do different acquiring parties and sellers matter?," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 50, March.
    9. Habermann, Hendrik & Breustedt, Gunnar, 2011. "Einfluss der Biogaserzeugung auf landwirtschaftliche Pachtpreise in Deutschland," Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development, Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development, vol. 60(2).
    10. Margarian, Anne, 2008. "Sind die Pachten im Osten zu niedrig oder im Westen zu hoch?," Thünen Working Paper 104609, Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut (vTI), Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kionka, Marlene & Kuethe, Todd H. & Musshoff, Oliver & Odening, Martin & Ritter, Matthias, 2022. "Bargaining Power in the Agricultural Land Rental Market," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322186, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alexander März & Nadja Klein & Thomas Kneib & Oliver Musshoff, 2016. "Analysing farmland rental rates using Bayesian geoadditive quantile regression," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 43(4), pages 663-698.
    2. Hennig Solveigh & Breustedt Gunnar, 2018. "The Incidence of Agricultural Subsidies on Rental Rates for Grassland," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 238(2), pages 125-156, April.
    3. Lehn, Friederike & Bahrs, Enno, 2018. "Analysis of factors influencing standard farmland values with regard to stronger interventions in the German farmland market," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 138-146.
    4. Friederike Lehn & Enno Bahrs, 2018. "Land-Use Competition or Compatibility between Nature Conservation and Agriculture? The Impact of Protected Areas on German Standard Farmland Values," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-20, April.
    5. Paul Feichtinger & Klaus Salhofer, 2016. "The Fischler Reform of the Common Agricultural Policy and Agricultural Land Prices," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 92(3), pages 411-432.
    6. Cord-Friedrich von Hobe & Marius Michels & Oliver Musshoff, 2021. "German Farmers’ Perspectives on Price Drivers in Agricultural Land Rental Markets—A Combination of a Systematic Literature Review and Survey Results," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-22, February.
    7. Scholz, L. & Meyer-Aurich, A. & Kirschke, D., 2014. "Bestimmungsfaktoren der Silomaisproduktion - Eine räumlich-ökonometrische Analyse," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 49, March.
    8. Heinrich, F. & Appel, F., 2018. "Do investors ruin Germany s peasant agriculture?," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277171, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    9. repec:zbw:inwedp:582015 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Anna Sobczak & Ewa Chomać-Pierzecka & Andrzej Kokiel & Monika Różycka & Jacek Stasiak & Dariusz Soboń, 2022. "Economic Conditions of Using Biodegradable Waste for Biogas Production, Using the Example of Poland and Germany," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-18, July.
    11. Hennig, Solveigh & Breustedt, Gunnar & Latacz-Lohmann, Uwe, 2014. "Zum Einfluss mitgehandelter Zahlungsansprüche auf die Kauf- und Pachtpreise von Ackerland in Schleswig-Holstein," Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development, Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development, vol. 63(4).
    12. Emmann, Carsten H. & Guenther-Lübbers, Welf & Theuvsen, Ludwig, 2013. "Impacts of Biogas Production on the Production Factors Land and Labour – Current Effects, Possible Consequences and Further Research Needs," 2013 International European Forum, February 18-22, 2013, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 164768, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    13. Graubner, Marten & Hüttel, Silke, 2024. "Rental and sale prices of agricultural lands under spatial competition," FORLand Working Papers 29 (2024), Humboldt University Berlin, DFG Research Unit 2569 FORLand "Agricultural Land Markets – Efficiency and Regulation".
    14. Guenther-Lübbers, W. & Theuvsen, L., 2015. "Regionalökonomische Effekte der niedersächsischen Biogasproduktion," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 50, March.
    15. Henning Schaak & Oliver Musshoff, 2022. "The distribution of the rent–price relationship of agricultural land in Germany," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 49(3), pages 696-718.
    16. Riedel, Nadine & Simmler, Martin & Wittrock, Christian, 2020. "Local fiscal policies and their impact on the number and spatial distribution of new firms," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    17. Olena Myrna & Martin Odening & Matthias Ritter, 2019. "The Influence of Wind Energy and Biogas on Farmland Prices," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-14, January.
    18. Theesfeld, Insa & Soliev, Ilkhom & Bunkus, Ramona, 2020. "Social Dimensions of Agricultural Land Transactions in Germany: An Analysis with a Structural Equation Model," 60th Annual Conference, Halle/ Saale, Germany, September 23-25, 2020 305582, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    19. Sommer, Felicitas & de Vries, Walter Timo, 2023. "Values and representations in land registers and their legal, technical, social effects on land rights as an administrative artefact," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    20. Ramona Bunkus & Insa Theesfeld, 2018. "Land Grabbing in Europe? Socio-Cultural Externalities of Large-Scale Land Acquisitions in East Germany," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-21, August.
    21. Paul Feichtinger & Klaus Salhofer, 2016. "The Fischler Reform of the Common Agricultural Policy and Agricultural Land Prices," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 92(3), pages 411-432.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:gewi18:275847. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gewisea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.