IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/cfcp15/344266.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Agricultural Technology Utilization and the Welfare Outcomes of Smallholder Farming Households in Nigeria: An Insight from Rice Farmers in the Anchor Borrower Programme

Author

Listed:
  • Emokpae, O. P.
  • Okoruwa, V.O.

Abstract

The welfare of smallholder farmers in developing economies is often compromised by a dearth of basic livelihood amenities. This resource constraint problem even among beneficiaries of inputs subsidy interventions may override their incentives to adequately utilize improved agricultural technologies for better livelihood outcomes. We therefore explored the technology utilization pattern and the corresponding welfare outcomes of a cross-section of rice farming households in Nigeria under the auspices of the Anchor Borrower Programme. Data analysis was accomplished via mixed methods. Inferential statistics was employed to provide an extensive overview of their technology utilization patterns and welfare outcomes. The instrumental-variable probit regression model was used to consistently analyze the factors that influence rice farmers’ probability of participating in the ABP. Lastly, thematic analysis was used to analyze ancillary qualitative information. Our findings show that rice farmers utilize various mix agricultural technologies and the highest proportion was observed for those who opted for inorganic fertilizers and crop protection chemicals marginally and jointly. Their welfare outcomes appear to vary contingent on the choices of technologies utilized. While social group membership is the strongest factor that influences rice farmers’ decision to participate in the ABP, diversification of cropping activities proved to be the strongest impediment.

Suggested Citation

  • Emokpae, O. P. & Okoruwa, V.O., 2024. "Agricultural Technology Utilization and the Welfare Outcomes of Smallholder Farming Households in Nigeria: An Insight from Rice Farmers in the Anchor Borrower Programme," IAAE 2024 Conference, August 2-7, 2024, New Delhi, India 344266, International Association of Agricultural Economists (IAAE).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:cfcp15:344266
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.344266
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/344266/files/21566.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.344266?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bola Amoke Awotide & Aziz A. Karimov & Aliou Diagne, 2016. "Agricultural technology adoption, commercialization and smallholder rice farmers’ welfare in rural Nigeria," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 4(1), pages 1-24, December.
    2. Mulenga, Brian P. & Hadunka, Protensia & Richardson, Robert B., 2017. "Rural households’ participation in charcoal production in Zambia: Does agricultural productivity play a role?," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 56-62.
    3. Bahta Yonas Tesfamariam & Enoch Owusu-Sekyere & Donkor Emmanuel & Tlalang Boipelo Elizabeth, 2018. "The impact of the homestead food garden programme on food security in South Africa," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 10(1), pages 95-110, February.
    4. John Kanburi Bidzakin & Simon C. Fialor & Dadson Awunyo-Vitor & Iddrisu Yahaya, 2019. "Impact of contract farming on rice farm performance: Endogenous switching regression," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 1618229-161, January.
    5. Julius Manda & Makaiko G. Khonje & Arega D. Alene & Therese Gondwe, 2017. "Welfare impacts of improved groundnut varieties in eastern Zambia: A heterogeneous treatment effects approach," Agrekon, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(4), pages 313-329, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nurul Atiqah Binti Mohd Suib & Norlida Hanim Mohd Salleh & Mohd Fazim Ahmad, 2023. "The economic well-being of smallholders and challenges during COVID-19 pandemic: A review," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 69(1), pages 35-44.
    2. Yigezu, Yigezu A. & Abbas, Enas & Swelam, Atef & Sabry, Sami R.S. & Moustafa, Moustafa A. & Halila, Habib, 2021. "Socioeconomic, biophysical, and environmental impacts of raised beds in irrigated wheat: A case study from Egypt," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    3. Ayala Wineman & Timothy Njagi & C. Leigh Anderson & Travis W. Reynolds & Didier Yélognissè Alia & Priscilla Wainaina & Eric Njue & Pierre Biscaye & Miltone W. Ayieko, 2020. "A Case of Mistaken Identity? Measuring Rates of Improved Seed Adoption in Tanzania Using DNA Fingerprinting," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 71(3), pages 719-741, September.
    4. Shaibu Baanni Azumah & Abraham Zakaria & Rosaine N. Yegbemey & Philips A. Apalogta & Vishal Dagar & Abass Mahama, 2022. "Climate Smart Production, Gross Income, and Downstream Risk Characterization of Rice Farmers in Ghana," Journal of Agricultural Studies, Macrothink Institute, vol. 10(2), pages 13-35, June.
    5. Toba Stephen Olasehinde & Fangbin Qiao & Shiping Mao, 2022. "Performance of Nigerian Rice Farms from 2010 to 2019: A Stochastic Metafrontier Approach," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-13, July.
    6. Hannah Gichungi & Beatrice Muriithi & Patrick Irungu & Gracious Diiro & John Busienei, 2021. "Effect of Technological Innovation on Gender Roles: The Case of Fruit Fly IPM Adoption on Women’s Decision-Making in Mango Production and Marketing in Kenya," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 33(3), pages 407-426, June.
    7. Li Zhao & Shumin Liu & Haiying Gu & David Ahlstrom, 2023. "Risk Amplification, Risk Preference and Acceptance of Transgenic Technology," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-22, September.
    8. Moses Kazungu & Eliza Zhunusova & Gillian Kabwe & Sven Günter, 2021. "Household-Level Determinants of Participation in Forest Support Programmes in the Miombo Landscapes, Zambia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-20, March.
    9. Md. Sadique Rahman & Farhad Zulfiqar & Hayat Ullah & Sushil Kumar Himanshu & Mofasser Rahman & Avishek Datta, 2024. "Does the adoption of homestead gardening increase dietary diversity in climate-vulnerable coastal areas? Evidence from Bangladesh," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 8(3), pages 859-878, September.
    10. Kumar, K. Nirmal Ravi & Reddy, M. Jagan Mohan & Shafiwu, Adinan Bahahudeen & Reddy, A. Amaraendar, 2023. "Impact of Farmer Producer Organizations on Price and Poverty Alleviation of Smallholder Dry Chillies Farmers in India," Research on World Agricultural Economy, Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte Ltd (NASS), vol. 4(3), August.
    11. Mossie, Mengistie & Gerezgiher, Alemseged & Ayalew, Zemen & Nigussie, Zerihun, 2021. "Welfare effects of small-scale farmers' participation in apple and mango value chains in Ethiopia," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 60(2), May.
    12. Martinson Ankrah Twumasi & Yuansheng Jiang & Evans B. Ntiamoah & Selorm Akaba & Kwabena N. Darfor & Linda K. Boateng, 2022. "Access to credit and farmland abandonment nexus: The case of rural Ghana," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 46(1), pages 3-20, February.
    13. Mgendi, By George & Mao, Shiping & Qiao, Fangbin, 2022. "Does agricultural training and demonstration matter in technology adoption? The empirical evidence from small rice farmers in Tanzania," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    14. Prabath Chaminda Abeysiriwardana & Udith K. Jayasinghe-Mudalige, 2021. "Role of Peripheral Analysis Methods in Adoption of Successful KPIs for a Research Institute Working Towards Commercial Agriculture," International Journal of Global Business and Competitiveness, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 61-71, June.
    15. Adeyemo, Temitayo, 2021. "The 4th Industrial Revolution: What Role Does Infrastructure Play in Livelihood Choices and Outcomes of Agrarian Households?," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315136, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    16. Mbalenhle Gwacela & Mjabuliseni Simon Cleopas Ngidi & Simphiwe Innocentia Hlatshwayo & Temitope Oluwaseun Ojo, 2024. "Analysis of the Contribution of Home Gardens to Household Food Security in Limpopo Province, South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-13, March.
    17. Sylvester O. Ogutu & Jonathan Mockshell & James Garrett & Ricardo Labarta & Thea Ritter & Edward Martey & Nedumaran Swamikannu & Elisabetta Gotor & Carolina Gonzalez, 2023. "Home gardens, household nutrition and income in rural farm households in Odisha, India," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 74(3), pages 744-763, September.
    18. Herd-Hoare, S. & Shackleton, C.M., 2020. "Ecosystem disservices matter when valuing ecosystem benefits from small-scale arable agriculture," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    19. Ndlovu, P.N. & Thamaga-Chitja, J.M. & Ojo, T.O., 2021. "Factors influencing the level of vegetable value chain participation and implications on smallholder farmers in Swayimane KwaZulu-Natal," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    20. Mujawamariya, Gaudiose & Medagbe, Florent M. Kinkingninhoun & Karimov, Aziz, 2017. "Integrating quantified risk in efficiency analysis: evidence from rice production in East and Southern Africa," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 56(4), December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agricultural and Food Policy;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:cfcp15:344266. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iaae-agecon.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.