IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/stcchp/978-3-030-39691-6_11.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Concluding Discussion

In: Analytical Theory of Democracy

Author

Listed:
  • Andranik Tangian

    (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology)

Abstract

We discuss the major points that distinguish this study from some others on the same topic. In the domain of collective decision making, the aim is at computable optimal compromises as opposed to axiom consistency analysis in social choice. As for political philosophy, the focus is made on public determination in the sense of the Rousseauvian general will referred to by Borda and Condorcet, as opposed to the individual determination considered in public choice and mathematical economics. To enhance policy representation, we propose the Third Vote election method, which bridges direct and representative democracies. Finally, we explain how the operationalized notion of representativeness can be used in both societal and non-societal applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Andranik Tangian, 2020. "Concluding Discussion," Studies in Choice and Welfare, in: Analytical Theory of Democracy, chapter 0, pages 499-508, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:stcchp:978-3-030-39691-6_11
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-39691-6_11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:stcchp:978-3-030-39691-6_11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.